Yikes! Didn't they get acquire by, or merge with Hake Marine? Hake Marine redirects to Seaward Yachts. That website works.Funny thing, IP's website is down because of "Bandwidth limit exceeded" or more commonly known as not paying the bill.....
Yikes! Didn't they get acquire by, or merge with Hake Marine? Hake Marine redirects to Seaward Yachts. That website works.Funny thing, IP's website is down because of "Bandwidth limit exceeded" or more commonly known as not paying the bill.....
Both of my boys crew with me when they're home, and my 20 year old is part owner in the boat having invested some of his car money and sweat equity into her refurbishment.I agree it's a culture issue, but not that it's age. My kids love sailboats and sailing, and now my grandkids are interested. They got it from me and my wife and our friends.
Maybe continued fallout from Irma? IP was acquired by Hake Marine last year if I recall.Funny thing, IP's website is down because of "Bandwidth limit exceeded" or more commonly known as not paying the bill.....
I don't buy into that, at least not 100%. Slow leisure activities that have exploded in popularity in the past twenty years: snow shoeing, stand-up stand up paddle boarding, rock climbing, yoga, sea kayaking, lake kayaking, mall walking...There seems to be little patience for something "slow" or something that requires skill and time to learn...
Great question. Going upwind, modern non-overlapping fractional designs are a marvel of efficiency. With main and jib, they will be totally competitive in all normal racing wind conditions (5-25 knots). At the upper ranges, you first flatten the sails and then maybe take in a reef. But the jib stays put. Some very high wind locales (Sf bay) might see some boats with a smaller 95% headsail in place on the typical 105.Jack, do the race boats have a large sail inventory or can they race effectively today with main jib and flying sail? I guess I was thinking to be a competitive racer the skipper had to have a large inventory to handle all wind conditions. Is that true?
Very true. It makes weekly beer can jib and main sailing difficult. However, distance racing with a chute is tons of fun, even short handed with technological improvements like top down furlers.It translates pretty well to cruising. The only potential fly in the ointment is that this type of boat does NOT like to go downwind without a kite, which can spoil the plans of '2-sail' cruisers and racers. But other than that.... all good.
Fractional, non-overlapping rigs have been considered 'state of the art' for about 20 years. There has not been a masthead race boat designed in that time. In addition, fractional boats with overlap have been designed and built in that period, but mostly to deal with headsail max size in PHRF.Would fractional rigged be considered the 'superior' approach then for a modern fast boat?
From my point of view, yes! The masthead rig of the '70's with the large overlapping jibs was to a large extent the result of rating rules that didn't penalize for a large jib. Or said another way encouraged large overlapping jibs. Or look at the dingy world. Almost all fractional. Multi-hulls? Fractional. Get it? 150's are an aberration, not the norm.Would fractional rigged be considered the 'superior' approach then for a modern fast boat?
Exactly. Ever wonder where the term 'rated sail area' comes from? It come from the old CCA and IRC rules that measured sail area as (J*I)/2 + (P*E)/2. How do you game that?? Make the main tiny and the headsail has big as you could. 'Free' sail area. 180%s used to be common. Now PHRF limits it to 150% without a penalty.From my point of view, yes! The masthead rig of the '70's with the large overlapping jibs was to a large extent the result of rating rules that didn't penalize for a large jib. Or said another way encouraged large overlapping jibs. Or look at the dingy world. Almost all fractional. Multi-hulls? Fractional. Get it? 150's are an aberration, not the norm.
Ah rules! Yes the older ones (in particularly the IOR) were bad because they could be type-formed; building boats designed to exploit the rule (better rating) while not sailing slower. Newer ones, not so much.Rating rules always seem to be an evolution, not a revolution. If the change is too much too fast, too many boats become obsolete or nobody uses the rule. Think of all the old rules that have come and gone, CCA, IOR, MORC, the Ton classes, IRC, and probably others.
From my perspective, the problem with the larger race boats is that they do not age well. An old J24 or J22 can make a fine day sailor, even if it no longer competitive. What happens to the Pogo 36s in 7 or 8 years when they age out? Overkill for a day sailor and really not suitable for a cruising boat. Compare that to the old Pearson, C&C, Sabres and other "racer/cruisers" that can have a long life after the race circuit as a comfortable reasonably nimble coastal cruiser.
Of course there are always the Webb Chiles out there sailing Moore 24s and old IOR boats around the world solo or shorthanded. But, he is an exception, not the norm.
Nah. Classic class racing is awesome. I love the old J boats.Moral of the story: racing must be on the cutting edge. Cruising, not so much.
Well, hopefully we smarter as we get older.Ah rules! Yes the older ones (in particularly the IOR) were bad because they could be type-formed; building boats designed to exploit the rule (better rating) while not sailing slower. Newer ones, not so much.
Yes, classic yachts are beautiful and elegant. Remember the J boats of yesterday were state of the art in their day.Nah. Classic class racing is awesome. I love the old J boats.