Pictures of that setup?I spent an hour at the boat yesterday updating the trip line on our spin pole. 2mm spiderline with plastic stoppers to allow single handed single side release. Its beautiful. No way I let anyone else do that!
Pictures of that setup?I spent an hour at the boat yesterday updating the trip line on our spin pole. 2mm spiderline with plastic stoppers to allow single handed single side release. Its beautiful. No way I let anyone else do that!
That's my buddy Charly, the VP of sales at Pogo. He's also a world-class sailor. And a bit of a charmer.There's a lot to like about the POGO 36. I like the design intent of that boat:
I might change a few things. See Robert Perry's review here: http://sailingmagazine.net/article-1709-pogo-36-sailboat-design-review.html
I agree with Mr. Perry.
I buy into the prediction that the future will trend away from asset ownership and more toward the freedom of renting. If I were a boat manufacturer, I would be designing to meet that trend. Not just big catamarans in the tropics, but fleets of racer/cruisers at the local marina level.
you end-for-end jibe don't you? No Worries is setup for a dip-pole, but requires some maintenance to get it fully operational. I have been considering asym only instead of refurbing an older system. The pole requires re-rigging too.........I spent an hour at the boat yesterday updating the trip line on our spin pole. 2mm spiderline with plastic stoppers to allow single handed single side release. Its beautiful. No way I let anyone else do that!
In swells like any other boat. They also tend to stay flatter to the water surface, and less perpendicular to vertical. In steep chop they tend to lift their bow up and over, as they have tremendous reserve buoyancy in the bow to help prevent nose-plants while doing downwind.How do light-weight planing boats do in rough seas? I know that planing kayaks are a blast, but the kayaks that are made for super-difficult, big water rivers incorporate elements of displacement hulls, including rounded chines for secondary stability which is often greater than the primary stability.
Yes we EfE. You dip-pole on a 28 footer?? Thats a TON of extra work (and people) for a relatively small J measurement. Its only 8 inches longer than BlueJs and over a foot shorter than First 367 Kestrel, which also EfEs.you end-for-end jibe don't you? No Worries is setup for a dip-pole, but requires some maintenance to get it fully operational. I have been considering asym only instead of refurbing an older system. The pole requires re-rigging too.....
Watching POGO vids on youtube now. Was late for work this a.m. for same reason.
Great question, its a new kind of sailing.Jackdaw,
related question...
I've never sailed the tradewinds nor crossed oceans, but I've watched videos and read accounts and it would seem DDW sailing is a big part. In these type of boats, with swept back spreaders, is it still reasonable to sail wing and wing or is jibing to hotter angles the best vmg? In my own boat, I find DDW impossibly slow. Is this the norm?
yep, just the way it was setup when I purchased her. I have been racing on a dip pole boat, and sprit boat, and a sprit really could be a nice addition.Yes we EfE. You dip-pole on a 28 footer?? Thats a TON of extra work (and people) for a relatively small J measurement. Its only 8 inches longer than BlueJs and over a foot shorter than First 367 Kestrel, which also EfEs.
For sure, the J/112 is an awesome boat. And the build quality (contract built by TPI) is close to the Pogo standard. Designed for 'Elegant fast cruising', the level of interior fit out is high. I love it. But compare it to the Pogo 36 of the same length:Motivated by the raving here I checked out a Pogo 12.50 at the Annapolis boat show today. Nice boat, you can tell just walking on it that it would be a fun sail. If it were my fantasy money though I’d probably go with a J112e instead - the J just felt more polished and livable. Maybe one of the other Pogos would be a better comparison but they only had the 12.50 there.
That does sound like fun. Sad they didn’t have one in Annapolis. I guess they have enough demand for now without the added expense of marketing there.For sure, the J/112 is an awesome boat. And the build quality (contract built by TPI) is close to the Pogo standard. Designed for 'Elegant fast cruising', the level of interior fit out is high. I love it. But compare it to the Pogo 36 of the same length:
The Pogo is beamier with a deeper keel, has therefore a MUCH higher righting moment and much larger sail plan. But get this; it also weights an astounding 3700 pounds less. Almost two tons! Say that out loud, TWO TONS LIGHTER. 7600lbs vs 11,300. The Pogo will easily plane in any direction in twelve knots, the 112e pops up only on rare circumstances.
This is because everything is lighter. Not just the hull, but the doors, the steps, the mast, the tiller, the cover the the lockers, the floorboards, the bulkheads, the furniture. Everything.
Different boat.
Pogo builds boats to order. They don’t have boats around built to spec. I assume the 12.5 is there on agreement with a new US owner. You’re right about bringing a 36 over with the wait over 2 years.That does sound like fun. Sad they didn’t have one in Annapolis. I guess they have enough demand for now without the added expense of marketing there.
My post was intended with humor.Pogo does not appear to be publicly owned. But, this does not prevent someone from investing privately in the company.
I think he is lusting for a Pogo, but his honey is jealous.Hey jackdaw, do you have stock in Pogo? This thread seems to have turned into a sale Ad!