I really don't thing this is a racer vs cruiser thing. And while I DO race, I'm pretty sure I'm put more miles and more nights out than 90% of the people here posting, so I think I'm qualified to post from both sides.I can't believe the people in here siding with the racers! I'm in complete agreement with Skipper. You can't just duck one ... then it's an almost never ending process of ducking and avoiding, leading to confusion when others are coming up on the position where you are ducking to. Jackdaws illogical arguments are astonishing to me.
The only logical argument is the explanation that the racing fleets have told me on Lake Hopatcong. "When you are on starboard or otherwise have ROW (there's that term!) stand your course because that is what we expect you to do" They tell me that they will either cross or duck, and it may be close, but they don't want you to change direction while they are adjusting their direction in accordance with the navigation rules. In essence, the non-racer is considered no differently than another sailboat in the race. Perhaps their positive attitude is influenced because of the realization that a race on Lake Hopatcong is inherently difficult to maneuver around. That said, I usually tried to avoid the course, but not always. After several years passing thru race courses and sometimes blundering into an awkward situation, I never once had an angry look, gesture or spoken word. Always just a friendly wave. Maybe that's cause there just aren't any a-holes on Lake Hopatcong!?!?![]()
This would normally apply to anybody with a kite out, but I'll go so far as to suggest that a party barge pulling a couch is required to dump the couch immediately in front of you.No special rights when racing but I yield ROW to racers and spinnakers out of courtesy and appreciate it when others extend the same courtesy to me.
I don't think anybody has expressed that they don't extend the courtesy (of early avoidance). I certainly do when it is warranted and done early enough to avoid a conflict. The issue in this thread was about a racer who was decidedly abusive to a non-racer during a crossing situation. It doesn't matter why they were crossing. It only matters that the racer was wrong to assume that he could bully his way thru. To yield at the last instant, when other racers are converging, only creates confusion.No special rights when racing but I yield ROW to racers and spinnakers out of courtesy and appreciate it when others extend the same courtesy to me. It surprises me to learn this attitude is not universal among sailors.
In the ORIGINAL post, it is clear that the poster was not really sure how close the pass was going to be, or even what the best action was when he thought he needed to take action. Clearly turning UP on a starboard boat is NOT the right thing to do. If the racer on port took no action, it was most likely because he thought he had a clean cross. Good racers can spot that a 100 yards away. Most cruisers freak at boat proximity that a racer would not blink at. Not sure where the so-called abuse came in.I don't think anybody has expressed that they don't extend the courtesy (of early avoidance). I certainly do when it is warranted and done early enough to avoid a conflict. The issue in this thread was about a racer who was decidedly abusive to a non-racer during a crossing situation. It doesn't matter why they were crossing. It only matters that the racer was wrong to assume that he could bully his way thru. To yield at the last instant, when other racers are converging, only creates confusion.
is what most people are disagreeing with.Skipper said:When I'm crossing a race, if I'm stand on, I stand on. It should be expected by the racers under COLREGS.
It's the ocean. Nobody owns it.
Not true, the original post clearly indicated that the non-racer was holding course until the last instant. The racer was cursing at him and demanding him to yield simply because he was in a race. The non-racer turned upwind because ducking would have caused a significantly worse problem with the second boat coming up from behind the 1st boat. This is precisely why the non-racer was justified in holding his course. He was forced by the racer to take evasive action which you think was incorrect. I've seen this played out before, only in my experience, the racers simply maneuver to avoid the non-racer when the non-racer is stand on. This is much simpler and easier on everybody's nerves. Knock it off about cruisers freaking out. That wasn't the case in this instance. It was clearly a case of the racer being wrong, pig-headed and obnoxious. So, swearing and cursing with kids present and bullying his way through a crossing conflict isn't abusive behavior? It is where I come from.In the ORIGINAL post, it is clear that the poster was not really sure how close the pass was going to be, or even what the best action was when he thought he needed to take action. Clearly turning UP on a starboard boat is NOT the right thing to do. If the racer on port took no action, it was most likely because he thought he had a clean cross. Good racers can spot that a 100 yards away. Most cruisers freak at boat proximity that a racer would not blink at. Not sure where the so-called abuse came in.
That's a pretty solid understanding.Again, I'm a new to sailing and have never raced (though I hope to crew sometime after getting more comfortable with sailing) so perhaps I should just watch from the sidelines, but the gist of what I'm getting out of this thread is simply, "Don't be a dick" be you a racer or a cruiser. A principle that holds up well in many facets of life, I'd say.
Scott, I think you're confusing the posts in this thread. In the original poster's story, there was no yelling, cursing, etc. The OP was concerned that the racer would not give way to him as he was required to do, so the OP evaded (in a way that may have confused the racer), and everyone sailed away. Kimelmore had a later story about being cursed at in front of kids while crossing a race course on port tack, but that's a whole different thing. The behavior of the racers kimelmore described is certainly reprehensible, but the racer in the OP story wasn't obnoxious or bullying as far as I can tell. My guess is that he was just going to duck the OP at the last moment and probably should've hailed "hold your course" to make that clear.The racer was cursing at him and demanding him to yield simply because he was in a race. The non-racer turned upwind because ducking would have caused a significantly worse problem with the second boat coming up from behind the 1st boat. This is precisely why the non-racer was justified in holding his course. He was forced by the racer to take evasive action which you think was incorrect. I've seen this played out before, only in my experience, the racers simply maneuver to avoid the non-racer when the non-racer is stand on. This is much simpler and easier on everybody's nerves. Knock it off about cruisers freaking out. That wasn't the case in this instance. It was clearly a case of the racer being wrong, pig-headed and obnoxious. So, swearing and cursing with kids present and bullying his way through a crossing conflict isn't abusive behavior? It is where I come from.