Yanmar electrical problem.

Mika1

.
Nov 2, 2017
19
Hunter Legend 37.5 Space Coast FL
Is there a tutorial on how to bypass the existing wires to the pushbutton with new wire? (Yanmar 2GM20F)?

The distance from my engine to the starter button is about 4 feet, yet my Raspberry Pi restarts whenever I start the engine (running off the same bank). I assume that could be due to the poor wiring issue.
I am not sure If fixing the wiring or adding the starter solenoid is the best fix.

Greg
In my experience if any of your electronics reboot when you start the engine it's probably because they're pulling their power from the start battery instead of the house battery.
A starting battery, when you hit the button to start the engine, will temporarily drop down to something like 9-11 volts even though it's showing 13+ while at rest. A starter draws a massive amount of current for the few seconds it's turning the engine over and that draw will pull the battery voltage below the minimum threshold of the electronics involved - thus, they reboot.
Simple troubleshooting, simple fix: Turn your raspberry pi on then go to your start battery and pull one of the battery cables off. If your electronics shut down, they're wired to the start battery and you need to move them to the house bank. Hope this helps!
P.S. If you don't have separate start/house batteries, replace your battery cables. They're probably ~20 years old anyway. And when you do, look up an ampacity chart or cable sizing guide. Bigger is better as it will minimize the voltage drop and that'll be better for both your starter and your electronics.
 
Jun 8, 2004
1,098
C&C Frigate 36 St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
I am surprised that no one has mentioned the 30 amp fuse, just to the right of the starter in the schematic diagram posted by @jjgrizzard. This fuse is housed in an in-line, non-waterproof holder in the wiring harness, near the harness connector. Corrosion in the fuse holder will cause the intermittent engagement of the starter motor. Cleaning the contacts here (and the wiring harness connector while you're in there) will restore reliability. Nothing wrong with the Cole Hersey solenoid and new wiring either, just a lot more work.
 
May 9, 2020
162
Hunter Legend 37 Harrison Twp, MI
Have a Legend 37 as well, and took a slightly different approach. I read lots of these threads on running new wires or a booster relay, but thought I'd experiment with something a little different.

I took a 500A winch solenoid with remote, and wired it directly to the starter solenoid. I'm basically just using it as a remote switch as a 2nd parallel button to the push-button on the panel, but saved me pulling new wires to the panel. So the push button still sort-of/almost works.

Works great for me, don't know if it's the best idea. Was cheap and supposed to be weather proof for life exposed to the elements on a vehicle. I sail on fresh water... so we'll see the long-term, this is year 1.

I Keep the remote at the helm. Engine starts immediately. I'm obviously only using 1-side of the relay... and I've contemplated wiring the other side to an actuator to kill the engine... but maybe someday.

IMG_3017.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes: jviss
Apr 10, 2010
150
Catalina 310 166 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
I use an ACR in the circuit, it ensures my house bank stays charged as well as taking care of my separate start battery. However there is a feature people may not be aware of and that is the isolation feature. If connected to the start battery as per the wiring diagram on the package, it will isolate the house bank from the short but high amperage draw that can cause your electronics to power off or perhaps cause a power surge to them. Since installing and wiring in the full functions of the ACR I have never had a problem with my electronics dropping out during engine starts. Of course you can do this manually, start the engine then turn on all the electronics after the voltages have stabilized. To me, it is well worth the 100 $ the Blueseas ACR cost. Again your boat, your choice.
 
  • Like
Likes: Ward H

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,090
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
Have a Legend 37 as well, and took a slightly different approach. I read lots of these threads on running new wires or a booster relay, but thought I'd experiment with something a little different.

I took a 500A winch solenoid with remote, and wired it directly to the starter solenoid. I'm basically just using it as a remote switch as a 2nd parallel button to the push-button on the panel, but saved me pulling new wires to the panel. So the push button still sort-of/almost works.

Works great for me, don't know if it's the best idea. Was cheap and supposed to be weather proof for life exposed to the elements on a vehicle. I sail on fresh water... so we'll see the long-term, this is year 1.

I Keep the remote at the helm. Engine starts immediately. I'm obviously only using 1-side of the relay... and I've contemplated wiring the other side to an actuator to kill the engine... but maybe someday.

View attachment 226607
Thanks for posting that. I had no idea you could get something like this so inexpensively. I just ordered one for my windlass.
 

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,090
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
Just to follow up on the tangent, I received that winch solenoid already! Less than 24 hours from ordering. @Marmalade , do you have any idea why those ring terminals on the black, yellow, and white wires of the receiver are so tiny?

I'm also not completely clear on the instructions, kind of a poor translation. There's no documentation on the relay contacts, only a sheet that talks about the remotes and receiver.

Do you know the identity and function of the relay terminals?
 
May 9, 2020
162
Hunter Legend 37 Harrison Twp, MI
The directions aren't great... I agree! But also reference the pictures in the Amazon listing... they help.

On the receiver, the white and yellow wires go to the spade connectors on the relay. Why they ship it with ring terminals... I don't know, you have to remove them and put female spade connectors on them.

The middle spade connector in the relay should have a jumper to ground. If you have a 12V windless -or- if your 24V windless has a common ground to your 12V, this jumper will work. If different grounds, you'd want to ditch the jumper, as the spade connector and the receiver will need 12V.

Why the ground wire on the receiver has the small ring connector... don't know. But again, pay attention to 12 vs 24V.

The power/red wire for the receive should have a large ring terminal... if your using the relay on 12V, it can go on the positive stud just like the jumper. If 24V, would want to splice it to a 12V supply.

Obviously the middle main contact studs on the relay will go to your battery bank for the windless (12 or 24V) with the outer studs going to the windless.

Other point... once you have it all wired, you have to press/hold the power button on the remote for 1-2sec, that turns on the remote. The the "in" & "out" buttons work. Remote turns itself off after a few minutes.
 
  • Like
Likes: jviss

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,090
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
The directions aren't great... I agree! But also reference the pictures in the Amazon listing... they help.

On the receiver, the white and yellow wires go to the spade connectors on the relay. Why they ship it with ring terminals... I don't know, you have to remove them and put female spade connectors on them.

The middle spade connector in the relay should have a jumper to ground. If you have a 12V windless -or- if your 24V windless has a common ground to your 12V, this jumper will work. If different grounds, you'd want to ditch the jumper, as the spade connector and the receiver will need 12V.

Why the ground wire on the receiver has the small ring connector... don't know. But again, pay attention to 12 vs 24V.

The power/red wire for the receive should have a large ring terminal... if your using the relay on 12V, it can go on the positive stud just like the jumper. If 24V, would want to splice it to a 12V supply.

Obviously the middle main contact studs on the relay will go to your battery bank for the windless (12 or 24V) with the outer studs going to the windless.

Other point... once you have it all wired, you have to press/hold the power button on the remote for 1-2sec, that turns on the remote. The the "in" & "out" buttons work. Remote turns itself off after a few minutes.
Wow, thanks very much!
 
Jun 25, 2004
632
Hunter 306 Pasadena MD
This is rather long, so please feel free to ignore if you're not interested.

I’ve had a problem with starting my Yanmar 2GM20F for many years now (maybe 12-15?). Basically, it always starts the first time at the dock. But after sailing with the engine off, it might start on the 1st time, but it might take 2-4 tries to turn the engine over. It's never failed entirely. I’ve been aware of info on this problem on the forum for many years, but it hadn’t risen to the top of my boat to-do list until now.

So today I took my computer (with chatGPT) and the fancy Fluke multimeter I inherited some years ago down to the boat, and asked one what to do with the other. The obvious answer was “you have the same problem everyone else has already described in detail”, but I still needed to trace the wiring and figure out if I wanted to do the relay fix or the new wire fix, so I did some tests.

Several mildly sweaty hours later, I have some interesting data on the problem. First, I seem to have the A-type, new-type Yanmar panel for my 2GM20F, based on my engine serial number and the Yanmar manual. This tells me which wiring diagram to use. I found the starter, and traced the wires as well as I could. The starter has 2 large lugs: one is hard wired to the starter with bare wire, and the other has a heavy gauge red lead from the battery switch (presumably) and a couple of smaller gauge red wires on it. There is also a small lug with a small gauge white wire on it. This seems to agree with the wiring diagram;

starter1.jpeg starter2.jpeg wiring_diagram.png



The red terminal was hot, and the white seemed grounded. ChatGPT told me that "The large lug with the huge red battery cable is the B+ terminal. It should have approximately battery voltage all the time that the battery switch is on. The small red wires attached there are using that same terminal as a convenient source of unswitched battery +12 V; one of those feeds the engine/instrument-panel circuitry."

It advised me to check the voltage between the B+ terminal of the starter, and the smaller white wire terminal while trying to crank the engine. The idea was that if the difference between the 2 was large, this would be evidence of a loss of voltage to the white wire that energizes the solenoid. It has me use the min/max feature of the Fluke meter to measure this voltage drop. My first test gave:
initial voltage = 12.82V
first crank = min voltage of 1.52
2nd crank = min voltage of 5.62
3rd grand = min voltage of 5.58
So in theory, this said I was losing quite a lot of voltage when cranking.

GPT suggested that this might not be the best test b/c there's the initial cranking voltage, and then the engine catches... anyway, it didn't trust the readings. So it suggested pulling the fuel stop cable (so the engine couldn't catch) and cranking for 2-3 seconds so that the meter would have time to settle. And also measuring white wire to engine block ground, instead of white wire to red starter terminal. This time, I was lucky enough to replicate the "no crank" condition. My measurements white-to-ground were:
1st crank = 8.6V. The engine turned over normally.
2nd crank = 6.2V. The engine did not turn over, so the solenoid didn't get thrown.
3rd crank = 6.2V. The engine did not turn over.

In other words, 8.6V was just barely enough voltage to pull the solenoid in, but 6.2 wasn't. I then tried the B+ starter terminal to ground:
at rest = 12.68 volts
several cranking attempts = 10.2 volts, but it cranked each time, so I was unable to replicate the no-crank situation.

Even though this seemed to confirm that the starting circuit (small red wire to panel key switch to white wire) had excessive voltage drop, chatGPT wanted me to do more tests "for intellectual curiosity" (who knew?). I played along to a point: I did try to measure the voltage drop across the red-wire inline fuse near the starter while cranking. It was essentially 0V (and it looked totally clean and un-corroded). I couldn't find any way (without stripping insulation) to measure the voltage drop across the 2 connectors for the wiring harness (both ends of the "3m extension cable"), so I didn't follow instructions on that test.

Since I was still trying to decide whether or not to do the new wire solution, or the relay solution, I managed to get to the back of the Yanmar engine panel, and tried voltage drop across the key switch. It was 0V while cranking, which means it wasn't the problem. At first, I was confused to find another fuse next to the panel (moderately corroded, actually), but quickly figured out that it was a fuse to the power supply (going off the key switch) to the engine fire suppression circuit. It had nothing to do with starting, and in fact, the engine cranked even with this fuse removed.

One interesting test: engine block to red wire on the start key switch was 12.67 at rest, 12.0 with the key on (buzzer sounding), and 9.3 while cranking the engine. ChatGPT seemed to think (and I agree) that losing 0.67 volts just to turn the engine panel on seems excessive. So it tends to imply some serious voltage loss in the start circuit.

Anyway, given that I managed to find the wire chase leading from the engine up to the panel, and I got the panel off for access to the back side, I'm leaning towards just doing a run of 10 gauge tinned marine wire, red and white, from the starter to the key switch on the panel. Plus a fuse holder in the red wire run, of course. To me, this seems like less of a kludge than doing the relay for a relay. (No offense intended to those that chose this route. I'm not proud: I'd do the relay if I thought it was easier.) Thoughts and comments are welcome.
 
Jan 7, 2011
5,995
Oday 322 East Chicago, IN
Nice analysis. I have the same engine and same intermittent starting issues. I was going to reach out to Ralph Johnston to get some really detailed instructions on adding the relay…

But I will await your results as it seems to be a much simpler solution (if it works).

And keep an eye on ChatGPT, “intellectual curiosity” is another way of “out-learning the master”:yikes:


Greg
 
Jan 11, 2014
14,143
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
This is rather long, so please feel free to ignore if you're not interested.

I’ve had a problem with starting my Yanmar 2GM20F for many years now (maybe 12-15?). Basically, it always starts the first time at the dock. But after sailing with the engine off, it might start on the 1st time, but it might take 2-4 tries to turn the engine over. It's never failed entirely. I’ve been aware of info on this problem on the forum for many years, but it hadn’t risen to the top of my boat to-do list until now.

So today I took my computer (with chatGPT) and the fancy Fluke multimeter I inherited some years ago down to the boat, and asked one what to do with the other. The obvious answer was “you have the same problem everyone else has already described in detail”, but I still needed to trace the wiring and figure out if I wanted to do the relay fix or the new wire fix, so I did some tests.

Several mildly sweaty hours later, I have some interesting data on the problem. First, I seem to have the A-type, new-type Yanmar panel for my 2GM20F, based on my engine serial number and the Yanmar manual. This tells me which wiring diagram to use. I found the starter, and traced the wires as well as I could. The starter has 2 large lugs: one is hard wired to the starter with bare wire, and the other has a heavy gauge red lead from the battery switch (presumably) and a couple of smaller gauge red wires on it. There is also a small lug with a small gauge white wire on it. This seems to agree with the wiring diagram;

View attachment 239702 View attachment 239703 View attachment 239704



The red terminal was hot, and the white seemed grounded. ChatGPT told me that "The large lug with the huge red battery cable is the B+ terminal. It should have approximately battery voltage all the time that the battery switch is on. The small red wires attached there are using that same terminal as a convenient source of unswitched battery +12 V; one of those feeds the engine/instrument-panel circuitry."

It advised me to check the voltage between the B+ terminal of the starter, and the smaller white wire terminal while trying to crank the engine. The idea was that if the difference between the 2 was large, this would be evidence of a loss of voltage to the white wire that energizes the solenoid. It has me use the min/max feature of the Fluke meter to measure this voltage drop. My first test gave:
initial voltage = 12.82V
first crank = min voltage of 1.52
2nd crank = min voltage of 5.62
3rd grand = min voltage of 5.58
So in theory, this said I was losing quite a lot of voltage when cranking.

GPT suggested that this might not be the best test b/c there's the initial cranking voltage, and then the engine catches... anyway, it didn't trust the readings. So it suggested pulling the fuel stop cable (so the engine couldn't catch) and cranking for 2-3 seconds so that the meter would have time to settle. And also measuring white wire to engine block ground, instead of white wire to red starter terminal. This time, I was lucky enough to replicate the "no crank" condition. My measurements white-to-ground were:
1st crank = 8.6V. The engine turned over normally.
2nd crank = 6.2V. The engine did not turn over, so the solenoid didn't get thrown.
3rd crank = 6.2V. The engine did not turn over.

In other words, 8.6V was just barely enough voltage to pull the solenoid in, but 6.2 wasn't. I then tried the B+ starter terminal to ground:
at rest = 12.68 volts
several cranking attempts = 10.2 volts, but it cranked each time, so I was unable to replicate the no-crank situation.

Even though this seemed to confirm that the starting circuit (small red wire to panel key switch to white wire) had excessive voltage drop, chatGPT wanted me to do more tests "for intellectual curiosity" (who knew?). I played along to a point: I did try to measure the voltage drop across the red-wire inline fuse near the starter while cranking. It was essentially 0V (and it looked totally clean and un-corroded). I couldn't find any way (without stripping insulation) to measure the voltage drop across the 2 connectors for the wiring harness (both ends of the "3m extension cable"), so I didn't follow instructions on that test.

Since I was still trying to decide whether or not to do the new wire solution, or the relay solution, I managed to get to the back of the Yanmar engine panel, and tried voltage drop across the key switch. It was 0V while cranking, which means it wasn't the problem. At first, I was confused to find another fuse next to the panel (moderately corroded, actually), but quickly figured out that it was a fuse to the power supply (going off the key switch) to the engine fire suppression circuit. It had nothing to do with starting, and in fact, the engine cranked even with this fuse removed.

One interesting test: engine block to red wire on the start key switch was 12.67 at rest, 12.0 with the key on (buzzer sounding), and 9.3 while cranking the engine. ChatGPT seemed to think (and I agree) that losing 0.67 volts just to turn the engine panel on seems excessive. So it tends to imply some serious voltage loss in the start circuit.

Anyway, given that I managed to find the wire chase leading from the engine up to the panel, and I got the panel off for access to the back side, I'm leaning towards just doing a run of 10 gauge tinned marine wire, red and white, from the starter to the key switch on the panel. Plus a fuse holder in the red wire run, of course. To me, this seems like less of a kludge than doing the relay for a relay. (No offense intended to those that chose this route. I'm not proud: I'd do the relay if I thought it was easier.) Thoughts and comments are welcome.
The voltage drops after cranking seem quite high. How old is the start battery? The resting voltage is fine however dropping to 10.2 after several cranking attempts suggests the battery capacity is quite compromised.
 
Jun 25, 2004
632
Hunter 306 Pasadena MD
Nice analysis. I have the same engine and same intermittent starting issues. I was going to reach out to Ralph Johnston to get some really detailed instructions on adding the relay…

But I will await your results as it seems to be a much simpler solution (if it works).

And keep an eye on ChatGPT, “intellectual curiosity” is another way of “out-learning the master”:yikes:


Greg
Greg,

Thanks. I think all the testing wasn't really necessary, since this is a well documented problem. But it did get me in there, tracing wiring and understanding where exactly the red/white wires are that I have to bypass. One of the main questions I wanted to answer (separate from all the voltage readings) was: can I easily see how the existing wiring harness is run, and can I get access to the back of the engine panel up in the cockpit? Since it seems like I can, running new wire is both cheaper and less of a kludge than the relay fix, so I'll do that. I have a lot of that corrugated split plastic wire loom (chafe protection, really) left over from a fridge install, so I think I'll use fish tape and try to fish the loom with the red/white wires already inside. I just have to get it from the engine back to the stern through a PVC wire chase under the aft bunk, where it comes out into the open up until it goes up to the panel.

I think chatGPT was actually extremely helpful in making suggestions of tests to try, and helping to interpret the results. I used it last weekend to diagnose a no-start condition on a riding mower. I take everything it says with a huge dose of salt: really as an idea generator. But man: it's getting better and better, and it's been a great aid to diagnosis.
 
  • Like
Likes: jssailem
Jun 25, 2004
632
Hunter 306 Pasadena MD
The voltage drops after cranking seem quite high. How old is the start battery? The resting voltage is fine however dropping to 10.2 after several cranking attempts suggests the battery capacity is quite compromised.
Dave,
The start battery is maybe 5 years old. I intentionally used it instead of the house bank, because I wanted a weaker battery to try to replicate the no-start condition (which I did, briefly).

I took many different measurements, but the 10.2 you're referring to was at the big starter lug where the battery cable attaches ("B+") to ground. To be clear, the voltage there was 12.68V with the key off and having cranked the engine many, many times doing other tests (some of which I didn't list above). Then with the probes in the same place (red lug to ground at the starter), I held the key to crank the engine for several seconds with the fuel cut off. That's when I read the 10.2, and I did this at least 3 times. I don't know what's normal, but the engine was cranking vigorously. Here's an excerpt from my chatGPT conversation (one small part of a long conversation with many tests):

ME: "I did B+ to ground. I started with 12.68V at rest. While cranking, I got around 10.2V.
Unfortunately for the test, it cranked around 4 times: I couldn't replicate the no-crank fault."

GPT: "That's still useful. It tells us something important about the high-current side of the
starting system. Starting at 12.68 V and dropping to about 10.2 V while the starter is actually
cranking
isn't surprising for an older/smaller starting battery under a heavy starter load. More
importantly, the starter is cranking vigorously enough to start the engine under normal
circumstances, so I wouldn't presently regard the battery/high-current circuit as the primary
suspect.
Putting your measurements together:
TestResult
Battery/B+ at rest12.5–12.8 V
B+ while starter cranking~10.2 V
White wire while successful crank8.6 V
White wire during no-crank6.2 V
B+ → white during earlier cranking~5.6 V
The 6.2 V during an actual no-crank event is the most important observation you've made. That's direct evidence that the solenoid isn't receiving adequate control voltage when the failure occurs.
 
Jan 11, 2014
14,143
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
Dave,
The start battery is maybe 5 years old. I intentionally used it instead of the house bank, because I wanted a weaker battery to try to replicate the no-start condition (which I did, briefly).

I took many different measurements, but the 10.2 you're referring to was at the big starter lug where the battery cable attaches ("B+") to ground. To be clear, the voltage there was 12.68V with the key off and having cranked the engine many, many times doing other tests (some of which I didn't list above). Then with the probes in the same place (red lug to ground at the starter), I held the key to crank the engine for several seconds with the fuel cut off. That's when I read the 10.2, and I did this at least 3 times. I don't know what's normal, but the engine was cranking vigorously. Here's an excerpt from my chatGPT conversation (one small part of a long conversation with many tests):

ME: "I did B+ to ground. I started with 12.68V at rest. While cranking, I got around 10.2V.
Unfortunately for the test, it cranked around 4 times: I couldn't replicate the no-crank fault."

GPT: "That's still useful. It tells us something important about the high-current side of the
starting system. Starting at 12.68 V and dropping to about 10.2 V while the starter is actually
cranking
isn't surprising for an older/smaller starting battery under a heavy starter load. More
importantly, the starter is cranking vigorously enough to start the engine under normal
circumstances, so I wouldn't presently regard the battery/high-current circuit as the primary
suspect.
Putting your measurements together:
TestResult
Battery/B+ at rest12.5–12.8 V
B+ while starter cranking~10.2 V
White wire while successful crank8.6 V
White wire during no-crank6.2 V
B+ → white during earlier cranking~5.6 V
The 6.2 V during an actual no-crank event is the most important observation you've made. That's direct evidence that the solenoid isn't receiving adequate control voltage when the failure occurs.
I wasn’t suggesting the battery was the primary cause, it is however a factor to be considered. The battery may not need replacing now, it just has fewer starts ahead of it than behind it. Time to budget for a new start battery.

When I replaced the wire I took the power straight from the DC+ bus. It was a short run and easier than running 2 wires to the starter. I rejected the relay solution because it adds more connections and another device to fail. Keep it simple.
 
Jun 25, 2004
632
Hunter 306 Pasadena MD
I wasn’t suggesting the battery was the primary cause, it is however a factor to be considered. The battery may not need replacing now, it just has fewer starts ahead of it than behind it. Time to budget for a new start battery.

When I replaced the wire I took the power straight from the DC+ bus. It was a short run and easier than running 2 wires to the starter. I rejected the relay solution because it adds more connections and another device to fail. Keep it simple.
No doubt that's true, given the 5 year age. I put in a much bigger house bank (two 6V golf cart batteries) and a battery monitor several years ago after ruining an almost brand new lead acid battery by drawing it down too low. The starter battery survived, however, and I only use it every now and then as a check: generally I start the engine with the house bank. Apart from this Yanmar wiring problem, it's never failed me (meaning I've never gotten the slow, cantankerous turn over that you get with a car when you've left your lights on). Of course, you're right that a moderately weaker battery will interact with the voltage loss in the start circuit, exacerbating the Yanmar no-start phenomenon, even when the battery does have enough juice to turn the starter.
 
Jan 11, 2014
14,143
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
No doubt that's true, given the 5 year age. I put in a much bigger house bank (two 6V golf cart batteries) and a battery monitor several years ago after ruining an almost brand new lead acid battery by drawing it down too low. The starter battery survived, however, and I only use it every now and then as a check: generally I start the engine with the house bank. Apart from this Yanmar wiring problem, it's never failed me (meaning I've never gotten the slow, cantankerous turn over that you get with a car when you've left your lights on). Of course, you're right that a moderately weaker battery will interact with the voltage loss in the start circuit, exacerbating the Yanmar no-start phenomenon, even when the battery does have enough juice to turn the starter.
How are you keeping the house battery charged? Are you monitoring its SOC?
 
Jun 25, 2004
632
Hunter 306 Pasadena MD
How are you keeping the house battery charged? Are you monitoring its SOC?
Both the house bank and the starter are on a charger (the same one that came with the boat in 2004). The house bank has a Balmar battery monitor. The starter only has a voltage meter.
 
Last edited:
Jan 11, 2014
14,143
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
It doesn't take much energy to run the starter motor, just a a little bit delivered real fast. A battery in decline can still start the engine, but there won't be much of a safety margin for multiple starts.