Super Secret Settled Science of Sailing?

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
In the words of Einstein, "a consensus of 100 scientists can be undone by a single fact." More importantly, in the words of Michael Crichton in a lecture to the faculty at Cal Tech: "There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus it isn't science; if it's science, it isn't consensus." Science is "settled" only provisionally, awaiting discovery of some new fact that ushers in new insight. We must always distinguish the difference between what the press and others sometimes call "consensus science" or "scientific consensus" and what it really is, a consensus of individual scientists (and sometimes others) who may not have the facts or experiments necessary to "make" the science. Also, discovery and establishment of the truth about nature is driven forward by skepticism of the "accepted" explanations, not by agreeing with them to some government (or other) agency with a social agenda.
Excellent, well said.
 

kbnj1

.
May 8, 2010
15
Hunter 26.5 Riverton
I think sometimes whether or not a scientific explanation is 'settled' or not is less important than whether or not it's simple to understand, accurate 99% of the time, and therefore USEFUL to more people. Try this: Lift is created 2 ways: (1) by air or water 'pushing' on something like a sail, keel or rudder, and (2) by centrifugal force. Method (1) won't confuse many people, unless perhaps we complicate it by citing Newton's laws. Method (2) is very poorly understood by even the most brilliant among us. But if we think about forcing air (or water) to bend around a sail, keel or rudder (foil) and the centrifugal force that generates, it becomes much more simple and useful than trying to explain one of the Bernoulli's equations. The air or water on the 'outside' of the foil tries to go straight, but can't, and slings itself outward creating lower pressure. The air or water on the 'inside' of the foil also tries to go straight, but can't, and bunches up creating high pressure. If the foil (sail, keel, rudder, etc.) is at too big an angle (usually about 20 degrees for air; 'angle of attack') to the oncoming air or water, the air or water can't 'stick' to the foil any longer, and forms turbulence and eddies. This condition is a 'stall'. If you let it happen to your sail, you go slow. You can tell it's happening if the jib's leeward telltales are dancing around, or the main's leach tells aren't streaming aft. If it happens to your keel, you slide sideways through the water and you can't point for crap. If you let it happen to your rudder, you loose control of your boat, usually by violently rounding up or broaching if you've got the spinnaker out.

I've seen WAY too many sailors sailing (racing) very poorly because they just don't understand lift and stalls.
'When in doubt, let it out' (not stalled), but never let it luff. Learn to tell if you're sliding sideways more than going forward when upwind (keel stall). Keep the boat reasonably upright so your 'engines' (sails) aren't pulling the boat from 20' out over the water away from the drag (hull), forcing the rudder to work overtime, creating massive amounts of drag, or worse, stalling.

(If you're questioning how this works on a symmetric foil like the keel and rudder, envision how the water hits them at an angle (rather than straight on), creating more curvature on the leeward side than the windward side - this explanation works whether you buy into the centrifugal force explanation or not)

(Mechanical Engineer, Professional pilot, former flight instructor, longtime sailor, love to race!)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes: jon hansen

jviss

.
Feb 5, 2004
7,089
Tartan 3800 20 Westport, MA
The air or water on the 'outside' of the foil tries to go straight, but can't, and slings itself outward creating lower pressure.
That's not centrifugal force. And I confess that in all my years I have never hear centrifugal force suggested as a component of lift; nor do I find that simple to understand!

I think what you describe is 'deflection.'
 
  • Like
Likes: jon hansen
Jan 11, 2014
12,109
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
That's not centrifugal force. And I confess that in all my years I have never hear centrifugal force suggested as a component of lift; nor do I find that simple to understand!

I think what you describe is 'deflection.'
Think about coming off the interstate at too a high speed. As you try to negotiate the curve, your body and the car are thrown to the outside of the curve, that is centrifugal force.

If I'm understanding this correctly, as the air molecules hit the luff those on the leeward are deflected outwards. This outward deflection starts the molecules sailing in an arc where they experience centrifugal force in part causing a pressure reduction due to the centrifugal force not just the speed of the air molecules. Conversely, the air molecules on the windward side are also deflected outwards with the centrifugal force sending the molecules outward into the curve the sail transmitting the centrifugal force to the sail.

The short story is the air pressure differential is not due just to differences in velocity, rather it is the centrifugal forces acting on the sails that cause the observed pressure differentials.
 
Jan 11, 2014
12,109
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
I think sometimes whether or not a scientific explanation is 'settled' or not is less important than whether or not it's simple to understand, accurate 99% of the time, and therefore USEFUL to more people. Try this: Lift is created 2 ways: (1) by air or water 'pushing' on something like a sail, keel or rudder, and (2) by centrifugal force. Method (1) won't confuse many people, unless perhaps we complicate it by citing Newton's laws. Method (2) is very poorly understood by even the most brilliant among us. But if we think about forcing air (or water) to bend around a sail, keel or rudder (foil) and the centrifugal force that generates, it becomes much more simple and useful than trying to explain one of the Bernoulli's equations. The air or water on the 'outside' of the foil tries to go straight, but can't, and slings itself outward creating lower pressure. The air or water on the 'inside' of the foil also tries to go straight, but can't, and bunches up creating high pressure. If the foil (sail, keel, rudder, etc.) is at too big an angle (usually about 20 degrees for air; 'angle of attack') to the oncoming air or water, the air or water can't 'stick' to the foil any longer, and forms turbulence and eddies. This condition is a 'stall'. If you let it happen to your sail, you go slow. You can tell it's happening if the jib's leeward telltales are dancing around, or the main's leach tells aren't streaming aft. If it happens to your keel, you slide sideways through the water and you can't point for crap. If you let it happen to your rudder, you loose control of your boat, usually by violently rounding up or broaching if you've got the spinnaker out.

I've seen WAY too many sailors sailing (racing) very poorly because they just don't understand lift and stalls.
'When in doubt, let it out' (not stalled), but never let it luff. Learn to tell if you're sliding sideways more than going forward when upwind (keel stall). Keep the boat reasonably upright so your 'engines' (sails) aren't pulling the boat from 20' out over the water away from the drag (hull), forcing the rudder to work overtime, creating massive amounts of drag, or worse, stalling.

(If you're questioning how this works on a symmetric foil like the keel and rudder, envision how the water hits them at an angle (rather than straight on), creating more curvature on the leeward side than the windward side - this explanation works whether you buy into the centrifugal force explanation or not)

(Mechanical Engineer, Professional pilot, former flight instructor, longtime sailor, love to race!)
Sometimes it is easier to just say "keep the telltales flying." :)
 
May 25, 2012
4,338
john alden caravelle 42 sturgeon bay, wis
E.A.A. is happening right now in oshkosh. lots of lifting going on. love the dc3's

i'm in ohio, going north later this week for two months sailing
 
Oct 19, 2017
7,795
O'Day 19 Littleton, NH
I was taught in my physics classes that there is no such thing as centrifugal force. There is momentum with Newton's first law of motion and there is centripedal force, the force that tries to pull towards a center. However, that doesn't mean the point isn't well taken. The curve of the sail exerts a deflecting force on a mass in straight line momentum.

- Will (Dragonfly)
 
May 25, 2012
4,338
john alden caravelle 42 sturgeon bay, wis
fun fact: when driving a 1,000 ft ship into a slip it is standard to drop the stern anchor with a short fetch and then use the prop and rudder to maneuver in. if you drive too hard you will push enough water out of the slip and the vessel will settle on the bottom. then you can only stop engine and wait for the water to return, re float the ship. time loss. no reverse allowed. never back over a ship's chain.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes: Will Gilmore
Apr 16, 2017
841
Federation NCC-1701 Riverside
What a crazy thread. Its like listening to 5 year olds explain how how stuff works. Id be no better.

My bs filter filled up almost immediately and have to rinse it off frequently

Science should be easy as "better or worse".

IMG_20180724_164341.jpg
 
Mar 26, 2011
3,579
Corsair F-24 MK I Deale, MD
35 years of engineering practice taught me that it is best to approach anything important from 2-3 completely different directions. The problem of lift can be described in terms of momentum, Bernoulli, drag, and extrapolated from wind tunnel data. In skilled hands, they will all give you more accuracy than you can use on the water. Each highlights a different facet of reality, so which is best depends on what you are trying to understand. For example, Bernoulli seems most intuitive to windward, but a centripetal force model can be helpful for understanding a chute and its rotation to windward. Finally, remember that turbulent flow involves chaos and is probably best measured in a wind tunnel, there have been attempts at the math, but they are deep and require more information about variables then we typically have. We'll start with the fact that the airflow to the sail is somewhat turbulent, and that under the water, the boat is yawing and pitching.

Fun stuff.
 
Jan 11, 2014
12,109
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
Science should be easy as "better or worse".
The problem is people try to make science simple dichotomous, yes or no, this or that, but it just ain't the way it works.

My background is psychology and education and we spend a lot of time and energy trying figure out how kids learn and why folks do the things they do. What I've learned in the past 40 years is that if solution is simple, it's probably wrong or at best incomplete.
 
  • Like
Likes: jon hansen
May 25, 2012
4,338
john alden caravelle 42 sturgeon bay, wis
spinnaker, forward staysail, main, mizzen staysail, mizzen. tweeking the sheets for happy air flow is a fun game. a little off and it's very slow
 
  • Like
Likes: Will Gilmore

JamesG161

SBO Weather and Forecasting Forum Jim & John
Feb 14, 2014
7,707
Hunter 430 Waveland, MS
"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus it isn't science; if it's science, it isn't consensus." Science is "settled" only provisionally, awaiting discovery of some new fact that ushers in new insight
:plus::plus::plus::plus:
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

In sailing we should use the MACRO model that most designers rely on.

Sail design for LIFT, seems to only include forces is 2 dimensions. I often thought if you could disrupt the exit flow off the Leach, you might get more wind power on the same Sail Area.
Jim...
 
Apr 16, 2017
841
Federation NCC-1701 Riverside
The problem is people try to make science simple dichotomous, yes or no, this or that, but it just ain't the way it works.

My background is psychology and education and we spend a lot of time and energy trying figure out how kids learn and why folks do the things they do. What I've learned in the past 40 years is that if solution is simple, it's probably wrong or at best incomplete.
As a database optimizer. Ive seen it the other way around. Complex usually means the wrong solution was deployed. Ive made a living taking the complex and reorganizing to a better usually simpler model.

Start with a baseline... try something diffetent...measure versus baseline. Whats the difference? Better or worse. Throw out worse and note the design patterns for later.

Can the improvement be used as a design pattern?
 
May 25, 2012
4,338
john alden caravelle 42 sturgeon bay, wis
i do like the K.I.S.S method , it has served me well. i've only been a sailor, never done all these jobs you all get to do.
i've liked it
 
  • Like
Likes: JamesG161
Jan 11, 2014
12,109
Sabre 362 113 Fair Haven, NY
As a database optimizer. Ive seen it the other way around. Complex usually means the wrong solution was deployed. Ive made a living taking the complex and reorganizing to a better usually simpler model.

Start with a baseline... try something diffetent...measure versus baseline. Whats the difference? Better or worse. Throw out worse and note the design patterns for later.

Can the improvement be used as a design pattern?
In psychology we often start with the simple and keeping adding until adding additional factors no longer make a difference.

For example, we try to predict academic achievement and begin with cognitive ability to see how much IQ contributes to achievement, then we'll another factor, say parental educational attainment, and keeping adding until we account for most of the variance. We also look at the relative contribution of each of the factors.
 
  • Like
Likes: jon hansen

JamesG161

SBO Weather and Forecasting Forum Jim & John
Feb 14, 2014
7,707
Hunter 430 Waveland, MS
i do like the K.I.S.S method
K.I.S.S method = MACRO Model
The simple big view.

Although your Boat is Wave topping and trapping air plus water under your hull, your boat buoyancy is for all practical purposes the same. Even though the Density of the buoyant fluid is changing from time to time.
Jim...
 
  • Like
Likes: jon hansen

kbnj1

.
May 8, 2010
15
Hunter 26.5 Riverton
Sometimes it is easier to just say "keep the telltales flying." :)
The leeward telltales matter far, far more than the windward telltales because they indicate a stall and a sharp loss of lift. Understanding stalls helps us understand WHY that is, but you make a good point - just keep them flying.
 
  • Like
Likes: jon hansen
Apr 16, 2017
841
Federation NCC-1701 Riverside
In psychology we often start with the simple and keeping adding until adding additional factors no longer make a difference.

For example, we try to predict academic achievement and begin with cognitive ability to see how much IQ contributes to achievement, then we'll another factor, say parental educational attainment, and keeping adding until we account for most of the variance. We also look at the relative contribution of each of the factors.
Simpler often means having lots of small concepts, that work together. The "complexity" is a misunderstanding of how the smaller simple parts work or work together. We smply lack the documentation.
 
  • Like
Likes: Will Gilmore