Ha, now that's funny! It seems that the general consensus is that an electric motor makes sense for folks who use their auxiliary propulsion (or depend upon it) the least. Now, maybe it's just me, but that sounds oxymoronic. Why would anybody feel the desire to invest in a system (at potentially greater cost and greater weight) that provides the least capability. If it is for environmental reasons, then I applaud the sentiment, but if you're like me (I seem to be a good candidate) why should I feel more environmentally conscientious for using electric power (which is generated primarily by burning fossil fuels) when my annual diesel purchase is about 10 gallons?I think electric would be a great choice for these people. If you can afford $500K for a boat you don't take anywhere, you can afford a propulsion system that won't get you anywhere![]()
I'm sure there will be a day when better propulsion systems will make more sense than the internal combustion engine. I'm also fairly certain that I won't be on the leading edge among those who insist that the time has come. I'll wait until it is economically advantageous and practically feasible, if I live that long.