Replacing Diesel with Electric Engine

Bob J.

.
Apr 14, 2009
775
Sabre 28 NH
I'm putting an EP system in my 28'. There are some people that have successfully done this, have real world data & are very happy with the results. I suggest cruising the electric seas site or joining the yahoo forum.

As MS has mentioned, the projected operation time some vendors toss out look good on paper but realistically they are based upon perfect conditions. Is it cheaper than a diesel repower, in the long run, NO.

For me, EP will work. Personally I hate the smell of diesel & if I needed to use it to fuel a boat, there'd be a couple of Detroit or Cummins diesels under the salon floor:)
 
Aug 20, 2010
1,399
Oday 27 Oak Orchard
I had considered the electrics when I was in the restoration process. The info here only reinforces my decision to keep my Atomic 4 going was the best one. Had to fill up for the season last weekend and it took a whopping 5 gallons since June 1st. No diesel stench but you want to be ever vigilant about gas engines. Perhaps in the future a diesel will be in order but at 7500 bucks I'm not keen to upgrade just yet. PS I sail virtually every weekend so the 'bomb' gets a good run time.
 

Johnb

.
Jan 22, 2008
1,483
Hunter 37-cutter Richmond CA
"In my lake; it's nearly the perfect system, and makes much more sense than a diesel engine on a lake this size."

Totally agree with the above - but if you sail in tidal waters, or really want to go anywhere, electric power is about useless and anyone who gets suckered in will eventually curse the lack of capability.
 
Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
Main Sail: I bow to the logic in your calculation, however, I challenge the summation that a sailor (emphasis on sailor) would need to motor more than 20-30 KnM in a day without being able to raise his or her sail.

If my summation is correct, then during this period of time the vessel is motoring under electrical power it is still recharging via solar, wind or kinetic energy. Also based on the assumption that during a 24 hour period a sailor is able to alternatively raise sail and/or motor the boat that there would be sufficient reserve energy to operate the vessel. Likewise, in cases of emergency a diesel ginset could recharge the battery bank.

Argument 2: the cost of engine overhaul/rebuild - over the course of just a few years the Diesel engine will cost more to maintain than the initial cost of an electric engine and batteries. Another given is that technology will drive down cost and increase efficiency of battery life. Electric engines have very little maintenance. I admit I don't know how long they last.

Argument 3: the price of fuel is a constant variable - if there was a fuel shortage it might mean you can't get fuel. Or in the worst case scenario - civil unrest does not permit you to safely stop, an electric engine might just save your bacon.

Okay - most day cruisers are traveling the globe - then it's not a problem to stop for lunch or dinner while they recharge.

Argument 4: self sufficiency - I'm sure there are a few Doomsday prepares that would argue this point much better than I could possibly. Plus it's quite, meaning you can sneak into and out of port.

Argument 5: noise, environmentally cleaner, air quality - let's face it, things are different and eventually they will crack down on marine environment taxes.
 

Bob J.

.
Apr 14, 2009
775
Sabre 28 NH
Totally agree with the above - but if you sail in tidal waters, or really want to go anywhere, electric power is about useless and anyone who gets suckered in will eventually curse the lack of capability.
Johnb, I'm not advocating for EP but fact is there are many EP boats out there that sail in tidal waters. That's not to say there aren't the oheck moments, should have had a V-8.

First rules I learned about sailing: have no schedule & plan your trip to go with the flow.
So if someone's sailing habits are contrary to the above, you're right EP isn't for them.
Seems I see an awful lot of posts by folks looking for help with this engine problem or that engine problem. Diesel engines are meant to be worked & the way most sailors use them is counter productive to a trouble free life.
 

Johnb

.
Jan 22, 2008
1,483
Hunter 37-cutter Richmond CA
"If my summation is correct, then during this period of time the vessel is motoring under electrical power it is still recharging via solar, wind or kinetic energy."

If you were in a situation where you are using just 10 horsepower, then after an hour, not allowing for any inefficiencies, you would have to replenish approx. 7.5 Kw-Hr into the batteries. That would need about 750 square feet of solar panels to keep up. If you had a typical wind generator of 750 watts you could do it with 10 of them (at $800 each) provided the conditions were perfect. Where is the kinetic energy is going to come from unless perpetual motion is viable?

I don't want to be sarcastic but the point here is that the rate at which energy will be taken from the storage cells is huge compared with any way in which it can be put back in by any kind of "take along with you" device, other than an engine that can keep up with energy consumption - in which case you might as well just use an engine.

A diesel providing the above 10 HP for an hour would burn about 3.5 pounds of fuel, even at a relatively low efficiency. The batteries to provide that amount of energy would weigh 250 to 350 pounds.

If you want real capability you need an engine. Find out the facts before you lay down the bucks.
 
Feb 6, 1998
11,722
Canadian Sailcraft 36T Casco Bay, ME
Main Sail: I bow to the logic in your calculation, however, I challenge the summation that a sailor (emphasis on sailor) would need to motor more than 20-30 KnM in a day without being able to raise his or her sail.

Based on available data the average endurance of the batteries traveling 20 nautical to a 50% discharge level and 30 miles to a 75% discharge level.
That summation was straight from your post.....;) I was just using your own data points figuring you expected performance like that.

If my summation is correct, then during this period of time the vessel is motoring under electrical power it is still recharging via solar, wind or kinetic energy. Also based on the assumption that during a 24 hour period a sailor is able to alternatively raise sail and/or motor the boat that there would be sufficient reserve energy to operate the vessel. Likewise, in cases of emergency a diesel ginset could recharge the battery bank.
Do the math on this please.. Regen, wind or solar take a long time to replenish even mild use of an electric engine unless your entire boat is covered in solar panels.

Argument 2: the cost of engine overhaul/rebuild - over the course of just a few years the Diesel engine will cost more to maintain than the initial cost of an electric engine and batteries. Another given is that technology will drive down cost and increase efficiency of battery life. Electric engines have very little maintenance. I admit I don't know how long they last.
I am pretty anal about maintenance and I spend perhaps $100.00 per year on filters & fluids. Electric engines are low maintenance until they just stop or corrode. Corrosion is the big killer in ocean sailed boats. Some EC's are much better than others... Still you can do it on the cheap...

Argument 3: the price of fuel is a constant variable - if there was a fuel shortage it might mean you can't get fuel. Or in the worst case scenario - civil unrest does not permit you to safely stop, an electric engine might just save your bacon.
If we get to that point we have more to worry about than "yachting"....;)

Okay - most day cruisers are traveling the globe - then it's not a problem to stop for lunch or dinner while they recharge.
Unless you have Lithium, and a massive charger, you are not recharging over lunch. Simple physics.. It takes 6-10 hours to fully charge most flooded lead acid batteries and get them to full regardless of the current source. Once the batteries hit absorption voltage the current flows in very slowly...

Argument 4: self sufficiency - I'm sure there are a few Doomsday prepares that would argue this point much better than I could possibly. Plus it's quite, meaning you can sneak into and out of port.
The doomsday prepper argument? Now that's a new one on me and I have some customers who are real fanatical about EC's...:D:D Again if get to the point where we need to sneak into and out of a port under the cloak of silence the last thing we will be thinking about is "yachting"...

Argument 5: noise, environmentally cleaner, air quality - let's face it, things are different and eventually they will crack down on marine environment taxes.
Yes it sure is quieter and to me that is the biggest benefit. I personally don't believe is is cleaner or greener. Replacing batteries every few years? Green? Charging lead acid batteries is horribly inefficient and your use of inefficient charging means lots of waste energy which may come from a coal fired plant. IMHO an EC is a feel good green. If it makes you feel green, then I say go for it.. This is coming from a guy who drives a Prius, which is also feels good green, for many owners. Course I don't drive it because it is feel good green, it is NOT GREEN but it sure does save me money on fuel....;) I also love the technology and the amazing reliability of the vehicle...


I am sure the couple in the cold molded custom built 22' cat boat we ran into tied to the dock at Bucks Harbor a couple of weeks ago was making the same arguments. The boat was stunning, designed just for them and a true one-off build. They were charging at the face dock when we got there at 6:00 pm (we don't have many marinas up here so a special exception had to be made to allow them to charge.) When we left the next morning they were still there with an extension cord plugged in, charging. They killed the bank and had to be towed in, according to the lady on-board whom my daughter & I were chatting with. I don't know what they paid for the tow but I do know from talking with them the system was not meeting the "expectations" they believed. This would not be the first time an e drive system did not meet the expectations of the owners...

This is why I say to do the real math. Look beyond the rose colored lenses and make an educated decision from a mathematical perspective not from the "heart"... Doing so will result in a better system that DOES meet your expectations. This is the most critical aspect I see surrounding EC's, removing the ideals from your heart and moving the decision making where it belongs which is up to the brain...;)

On a related note I have a customer ripping out a composting toilet this winter after I heard about how great it was going to be for two solid years. She got way to idealistic and the composter completely failed to perform for her intended use. This stuff happens, especially when you let your vision or idealism cloud the picture. Everything I had pointed out to her came true. An no I have not done an "I told you so" as I don't need to rub salt into the wound.. Some people just need to learn by trial and error...

She is now faced with re-installing a new sanitation system, re-installing seacocks she paid big money to glass in etc. etc. etc...

All I suggest is looking beyond the glossy feelings about an EC and dig into the real data to make sure it fits into your box and your desired use. I only used 20-30nm because you did. If that is not your box then figure it out and design a system than will work for that, if it can. So your homework, do the math, learn Ohm's law, learn about batteries, Coulombic efficiency, Peukert etc. etc. etc... Spend more time on the science and less on the McDreamy aspecs of the EC and you will get a better system...

We non-real sailors don't often plan on motoring 30 miles, we would always prefer to sail, but up here in the land of 10'-25' tides, solid granite ledges, zero wind for multiple day stretches & pea soup fog the DC energy can run in short supply unless you don't mind bobbing around solid granite ledges in pea soup then sometimes you may need a range of 30nm...

Other areas or lakes are a far better fit for an EC than here in Maine but it still can be done if it fits the box for the intended use... I don't know your waters or use so can only suggest you do as much homework as you can.

Again EC's can & do work if you fit into the box. Unfortunately most cruisers do not... Lakes, dock tied at night etc. work best. Too many I have met come across or even my own customers tend to get idealistic about the fantasy of electric conversions, composting heads etc. and a couple have been burned badly. It can work but please do the math and homework so that it meets your expectations...

Battery technology is already here in LiFePO4 but budget conscious EC conversions do not fit in this box. The LFP bank & BMS alone can cost more than a new diesel but these are batteries that if charged and discharged correctly can likely last 12+ years in an EC. The battery technology is here, but it comes at a price.

If I had a day sailer I would probably put in an electric engine, just because, but the bank choice would be definitely LiFePO4. I would not personally even consider a lead acid bank for an EC for my own vessel.
 
Oct 24, 2010
2,405
Hunter 30 Everett, WA
My friend did it succesfully

Without wading into the energy debate here, I am currently in the Caribbean. I have a 2010 sailboat which I bought new with a 30 HP Yanmar diesel. When I return to the states, I plan to replace the diesel with an electric propulsion system and a small diesel powered genset. No not because of cost effectiveness but for capability. I have learned that motor sailing gives me better control in a seaway and an electric propulsion system does it with little/no noise, fumes, or heat. Getting an extra knot or cutting of 30 miles in a cruise matters. Finally, for those who have never experienced the torque performance of an electric motor vs an internal combustion engine not to mention the improved efficiency, I'd just suggest that the US Navy knows a bit more about the subject and they are going the Hybrid power route....fixed RPM diesel powering a genset that powers the variable speed electric drive
I have a friend who converted his Hunter 30 to electric. The only issue is if he needs to motor over about 15 miles. He does carry a generator, but his generator only gives him about 2.8 knots.

The quote above about the military is more like a diesel electric locomotive. Energy storage isn't their plan. Having said that WW2 diesel subs were closer to what folks today refer to when they think hybrid. It's really not new. What is new is higher energy density batteries.
Ken

Ken
 
Jul 5, 2007
196
Kenner Privateer 26 schooner, Carlyle Illinois
Plenty of people have sailed successfully without an engine. For that type sailor; a simple electric drive with a 5 mile range, might work well as an auxiliary. However, most sailboat owners treat their boat like a motorboat with an auxiliary sail.

You really need to be willing to put up your drifter, or spinnaker, and not turn on your engine when you drop below 5 knots boat speed, if you want to go electric. Most boaters never will, until fuel gets too expensive or unavailable.
 
Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
All of this discussion raises another question:

What percentage of the time do you use your motor?

What determines whether or not you're under motor or sail: Is it wind alone, or do you motor even if there is wind?

What percentage of boats venture out into Blue water where you're not returning to port at night?
 
Oct 2, 2006
1,517
Jboat J24 commack


i have managed to keep my 1970 A4 running with one valve job and carb/fuel pump rebuild :)


On last summers 200 mile journey on day one we sailed and day two we motored 50 miles and did manage to sail perhaps 140 miles of 200







On the last day we covered 80 NM in 10 hours
 
Sep 28, 2008
922
Canadian Sailcraft CS27 Victoria B.C.
All of this discussion raises another question:

What percentage of the time do you use your motor?

What determines whether or not you're under motor or sail: Is it wind alone, or do you motor even if there is wind?

What percentage of boats venture out into Blue water where you're not returning to port at night?
While that can be sailor dependent (powering when there is a good breeze to sail) in many cases it is area dependent. In southern B.C. between the mainland and Vancouver Island there are many narrow passes and strong currents. The breeze is usually very light in the summer months. Hard to sail through a narrow area with a light breeze with a strong current going in the other direction. The most popular destinations are marine parks such as Desolation Sound without any facilities - no docks or power. That is one of the area's attractions.
 

Johnb

.
Jan 22, 2008
1,483
Hunter 37-cutter Richmond CA
All of this discussion raises another question:

What percentage of the time do you use your motor?

What determines whether or not you're under motor or sail: Is it wind alone, or do you motor even if there is wind?

What percentage of boats venture out into Blue water where you're not returning to port at night?

What difference does it make? It is not what you want to do, but what you have to do that determines the capability you need.
 
Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
What difference does it make? It is not what you want to do, but what you have to do that determines the capability you need.
I disagree. It's rarely what you have to do, but rather what you want to do...people generally take the easiest solution. If we want to have an informed discussion on the viability of electric vs diesel engines we first need to understand behavioral traits of sailboat owners (motor, sail or simply sit in the harbor and talk about sailing).

Once we have this basic data, we can then make an informed decision.

I've been sailing for more than 40 years. I started out in sail school when I was 7 years old. My first command was an Optimist, followed by a Laser then gradually into yachts. In the early days my boats didn't have a motor - I had to learn to plan my sailing adventures based upon weather traits, solar therms and wind.

I can honestly say that over the years I've rarely used my engine (85% sail, 15% motor). Likewise I know people that use their engine 90% of the time. For some people the sail is something to use once in a while, perhaps its when they run out of fuel). I also know people that have never left the habor (content to sit at the dock with a $500k boat).

---Going back to the original topic --- going electric or staying diesel is about understanding behavioral traits to put into calculations for planning - so knowing if you're a sailor, a boater or a harbor master is a good starting point. Also, if 90% of people stick to the coastline - then an electric engine is probably the way to go - likewise if you're a blue water sailor traveling 1,500 nm then a diesel engine is perhaps better or if you're a habor master, then take the motor out and sell it.

No matter how people use a boat, whether its the engine or the sail - we're all fortunate to be on the water. Besides, as sailers we can show motor boaters we have the best of both worlds.
 
Last edited:
Sep 28, 2008
922
Canadian Sailcraft CS27 Victoria B.C.
if 90% of people stick to the coastline - then an electric engine is probably the way to go
Not on some coasts. See my post above. Unless you wish to go from marina to marina a trip from Victoria to Desolation Sound usually requires quite a few hours of engine use if you want to get there in time to enjoy the area before returning. With only a couple marinas in the area recharging by plugging in isn't an option.

Range is the largest issue. The standard fuel tank on many boats gives probably 40 -50 hours of continuous motoring. When you are trying to keep to any kind of schedule - back to work at holiday's end for example - it is nice to have if not necessary. Electric cannot accomplish this.
 

weinie

.
Sep 6, 2010
1,297
Jeanneau 349 port washington, ny
I dunno. I sat in a tesla yesterday. They managed to get the range on those things to 265 miles. I'm not saying that it's optimal for everyone. But the technology is getting better and better. If they can figure out a way to quick charge those things or do a battery swap at the equivalent of a gas station, they will definitely replace combustion engines. (at least in cars)
 
Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
I dunno. I sat in a tesla yesterday. They managed to get the range on those things to 265 miles. I'm not saying that it's optimal for everyone. But the technology is getting better and better. If they can figure out a way to quick charge those things or do a battery swap at the equivalent of a gas station, they will definitely replace combustion engines. (at least in cars)
I bought a Tesla Model S this past spring. Its a fantastic car, did you know they manufactured noise so that people would know it was running.
 
Sep 15, 2009
6,244
S2 9.2a Fairhope Al
I bought the Tesla Model S this past spring. Its a truly great car, did you know they manufactured noise so that people would know it was running.
i would think that if it was running it would be going in one direction or the other
when stopped it would not be running at all only in the on position
 
Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
Your correct, the motor is only engaged when in motion. There is not lag or sluggish behavior...its pure torque from the moment you step on the accelerator.

Having recently relocated back to the USA from Europe, I'd say the USA is about 10 years behind the EU on the development of electrical charging stations.
 

Johann

.
Jun 3, 2004
547
Leopard 39 Pensacola
This group of people are posers - want-to-be sailors). I also know people that have never left the habor (content to sit at the dock with a $500k boat).
I think electric would be a great choice for these people. If you can afford $500K for a boat you don't take anywhere, you can afford a propulsion system that won't get you anywhere :D