Replacing Diesel with Electric Engine

Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
I'm curious if anyone has considered replacing their old Diesel Engine with either an Electric Engine or Hybrid system. Technology has drastically improved everything from solar panels, wind turbines and battery power.

Even new technology now allows for a kinetic recharge from the idle propeller while under sail power. Batter power can last 11-20 hours.

It's still expensive, and the number of batteries you'd have to store is an issue....buts it quite
 
Sep 28, 2008
922
Canadian Sailcraft CS27 Victoria B.C.
If you are a daysailor who plugs in after each sail it can make sense in a quiet running way, but less sense economically. For cruising farther away from shore power it doesn't make sense - you cannot get the range. And as a hybrid, as Nigel Calder's 5 years of testing has proven - it makes less sense - both from an efficiency point of view and from an economical one. If you are going hybrid why not just install a new diesel instead of one with an electric drive as well. Now if you are bent on going green and are willing to spend a lot more to be that way go for it.
 
Jul 15, 2014
31
Hunter H-376 Silver Cloud Marina
If you are a daysailor who plugs in after each sail it can make sense in a quiet running way, but less sense economically. For cruising farther away from shore power it doesn't make sense - you cannot get the range. And as a hybrid, as Nigel Calder's 5 years of testing has proven - it makes less sense - both from an efficiency point of view and from an economical one. If you are going hybrid why not just install a new diesel instead of one with an electric drive as well. Now if you are bent on going green and are willing to spend a lot more to be that way go for it.
While I certainly mean no disrespect to your reply, I'm some what amused as it's reminiscent of what people said about electric cars. I think we can all agree electric cars are a success.

Based on available data the average endurance of the batteries traveling 20 nautical to a 50% discharge level and 30 miles to a 75% discharge level. Underway You can charge the batteries from an Air Marine wind mill; solar panels via A 12 to 48 volt optimizer.

Another option is to change to a fixed propeller which would let the regen work on passage but the price is high; 15% loss could add up to a 30 mile a day deficit.

"Weight comparison might be of interest:
Perkins 4.107, Walter v-drive, full lube oil and bunkers, 4 Trojan T105, 1 starting battery, exhaust/cooling paraphanelia
Total approx weight…………………………555kgs(1228lbs)
Electric Yacht motor complete, 8 Trojan T105 batteries, Battery charger.
Total approx weight…………………………258kgs(567lbs)"

If you're able to recharge then it's self sufficient and would not limit you to simple short day trips.

What's not economical about this approach?
 

KD3PC

.
Sep 25, 2008
1,069
boatless rainbow Callao, VA
While I certainly mean no disrespect to your reply, I'm some what amused as it's reminiscent of what people said about electric cars. I think we can all agree electric cars are a success.

Based on available data the average endurance of the batteries traveling 20 nautical to a 50% discharge level and 30 miles to a 75% discharge level. Underway You can charge the batteries from an Air Marine wind mill; solar panels via A 12 to 48 volt optimizer.

Another option is to change to a fixed propeller which would let the regen work on passage but the price is high; 15% loss could add up to a 30 mile a day deficit.

"Weight comparison might be of interest:
Perkins 4.107, Walter v-drive, full lube oil and bunkers, 4 Trojan T105, 1 starting battery, exhaust/cooling paraphanelia
Total approx weight…………………………555kgs(1228lbs)
Electric Yacht motor complete, 8 Trojan T105 batteries, Battery charger.
Total approx weight…………………………258kgs(567lbs)"

If you're able to recharge then it's self sufficient and would not limit you to simple short day trips.

What's not economical about this approach?

First, electric cars a success? For whom? And on what basis? Again, no disrespect, but your announcement of success ignores the total cost of an electric vehicle. Current news is that for the "Volt", a real cost of almost $200K USD, would be a more realistic number, and that GM loses almost half that on each and every car built. Offsets and tax breaks allow them to sell at a loss. Then there is cost of the power to "charge" them, that is largely ignored by the media and proponents of that technology.

Even electricity that is supplied by charging stations is not really "free", someone pays and some likely coal fired plant generates it.

As to your last question about "what's not economical...?" As a previous poster pointed out with Nigel Calder's 5 year experiment, the initial cost, ongoing cost of replacement of batteries, and the failure of wind, solar and other recharging options to at least be as "green" as diesel - just to name a few.

Not sure what a 12 to 48 volt optimizer is? Similar to a flux capacitor, I imagine.

Then there is the practical side of the installation, as you mentioned - just safely mounting and wiring a slew of batteries will require a lot of space that needs to be as low and central to the keel as possible. Looking at the pictures Calder has published in Professional Boat, one learns that most sailboats do not have the space for even these items, let alone the various control modules, inverters, etc.

One has to be concerned with the safety over time of high current, low voltage devices and their wiring. Calder points to the need for meticulous installation and maintenance, which most boaters often neglect.

While a novel idea in theory, Calder (and several others, btw) pretty much sums it up....just not as "economical" as current diesel systems provide, and at a much lower initial cost than "electric engines". Even ongoing costs associated with diesel systems are much lower than solar/wind/regen.

Best of luck.
 
Nov 6, 2006
10,060
Hunter 34 Mandeville Louisiana
TriSwiss.. it is the low charge capability of the replenishment devices that limits current electric power of sailboats.. Example.. Say a wind turbine is rated at 400 watts; that is max at a windspeed of around 30 knots.. mostly a wind gen will give around 100 watts at normal wind speeds. Powering a boat like yours at a decent speed typically uses say 10 horsepower.. that requirement from an electric motor is about 7,500 watts, or more like 8000 watts after inefficiencies in the mtor and the battery conversions.. so the wind gen has to run 80 hours for every hour of motoring.. 3 days of charging with a typical wind gen to run the motor for one hour at speed. With higher winds, and the wind gen making say 250 watts, the number is 32 hours of charging for one hour of running the electric motor.. Since a propeller is designed to absorb and transform power to make thrust, it is not that good for generating power from forward motion.. That would require different blade shape. Dragging a conventional prop to generate electricity can generate power about like the second wind gen case; again, 30 hours or so to pay for one hour of run time.. of course, you can slow down and change the numbers significantly, but I am talking regular cruising. Good for daysailing where you can tie up to shore power to recharge and don't mind waiting, but a real problem if one were to leave your area and head to Florida via the AICW..
 
Feb 4, 2005
524
Catalina C-30 Mattituck, NY
There is much online in this and several other forums on this topic. I've researched it and concluded it does not make sense. I agree with other other posters above.

I will add though, it all depends on what your definition of success is. I'm reading Lin/Larry Pardey's latest book and they've sailed around the world numerous times on 2 engine-less sailboats. If you have all the time in the world to wait for the sun or wind to re-power your banks or propel you boat -- then go for it. I spent last week cruising with my family around New England waters and put about 17+ hours on my diesel. Most sailors these days can't wait around for the wind and it will impact the resale value of your vessel.

So it boils down to what your goals are and how you measure success. Its not practical or economical for probably 90% of the boats/sailors out there.
 

Gunni

.
Mar 16, 2010
5,937
Beneteau 411 Oceanis Annapolis
Calder (and several others, btw) pretty much sums it up....just not as "economical" as current diesel systems provide, and at a much lower initial cost than "electric engines". Even ongoing costs associated with diesel systems are much lower than solar/wind/regen. Best of luck.
That is not what Calder has said regarding electric propulsion. In fact Nigel points out that the amortized cost of the typical sailboat diesel works out to approximately $4 / hr of use before you include the cost of diesel....more like $8/hr for my 2 ltr. yanmar when I add in fuel/oil/expendibles.

Calder points out that parallel hybrid electric propulsion greatly reduces engine run hours, provides the benefit of both diesel propulsion and electric propulsion, adds a massive electric generator/regenerator and puts it into a retro-fittable system design. The design challenge is the typical sailor who motors out and in to their slip using electric, and engages diesel power for extended propulsion. In fact he states that parallel hybrid electric power technology represents the most economical power system and is ready to go right now.

Steyr sells the technology right now, and BMW has installed parallel hybrids in their cars for several years. 40 mpg in a full size sedan, and an amazing torque curve.
 
Nov 8, 2010
11,386
Beneteau First 36.7 & 260 Minneapolis MN & Bayfield WI
Just like with today's electric cars, the question of electric aux power on a sailboat is as much about practicality as it is about economy. The 'practicality' part is VERY personal and depends on your boat and sailing program. Read up, learn, and answer THAT question before even looking at the economic side. That will probably just about wash anyway.

Good learnings here.

http://www.electricyacht.com/
 
Feb 6, 1998
11,701
Canadian Sailcraft 36T Casco Bay, ME
As a marine electrician, involved in electric conversions (EC's), all I can say is learn as much as you can and use REAL MATH... A lot of the proponents of EC's tend to mislead folks or tell partial truths in order to get in the door. I am on a number of electric boat forums and rarely do I ever hear someone mention the Peukert constant, battery temps or actual cycle life at 100% DOD which is where you wind up if you ignore Peukert etc......

Weight conversions are also most often misleading. They often pick the heaviest old school engines like the older Perkins 4-108 & the heaviest reversing gear, not a standard and considerably lighter Yanmar like the 3JH which is under 400 pounds with a Kanzaki or Hurth/Kanzaki.... They then entirely leave out the house bank when doing EC conversion math.. You can't really do that with a straight face.....

When we discuss battery weight we need to be cognizant of the fact that you will still need a 12V house bank. This was from an actual quote one of my customers received.

The 48V propulsion bank weighed 520 pounds but then the house bank may was another 130 or so pounds making for approx 650 pounds of batteries on a 28 foot boat. The house bank weight was left off any conversion calculations. If you are real energy conscious you could get away with a single 65 pound house bank but he wanted a minimum of 130Ah's to be able to easily power his windlass at 50% SOC....

With diesels you also have fuel capacity weight, which is not very light weight. A 20 gallon tank when full would weigh about 140 pounds +/-.. So in his case he had a 175 pound engine + 140 fuel = 315 pounds. With fuel filters and misc spares he was at about 360 pounds for engine and full fuel.

He was told the EC for his boat would weigh less? Really? Basic math often flies out the window when EC salesmen...

His quote was for an 8 battery bank which alone was approx 160 pounds heavier than the diesel engine & full fuel plus filters and spares. Of course the battery bank weight did not not the weight of the electric motor and associated gear which can be 100 pounds +/- with wire mounts, motor etc. This made his conversion nearly 260 pounds heavier not lighter as he was quoted.. You must be able to do accurate math for your own vessels conversion.

Not to mention he now had two battery systems, house/12V & electric / engine 48V at two different voltages but no large current source that could be directed at either. Sometimes an EC will weigh less but with lead acid batteries very often it does not.

On a 37 footer be sure you can physically fit enough solar and wind to charge two banks adequately in the time frame you would want in order to do 20 or 30 nautical mile runs.

E-power almost always requires a boat that is tied to a dock when done sailing or you wait a while between uses to recharge via solar & wind.....

By the time one gets done building a system like this fixing the diesel looks like a Kmart Blue Light special in comparison.

This is not to say e-power can't be done, it can be dove very suitably, if your use fits into the box.. Unfortunately "E" currently fits into a pretty tight box, range wise, for "E" only power.

To do these systems right, many are done very poorly using shoot from the hip math, can be very expensive and then you still need to replace expensive banks every few years. Or yearly, as one of my customer learned the hard way. He was mislead on his installation. Go figure, never seen that before..... :doh:

One must also keep in mind that the e conversion is only part of the expense. You also want wind and solar, and don't even think about the sub 1.5k wind gens as they are plain and simple wallet drains. A good quality wind gen and pole will run over 3k and still won't give you any sort of Ah recovery speed.

Also don't forget that you are charging two banks not one and at two different voltages.. Tapping off the propulsion bank for 12V is wrought with problems and I would not do that to any of my customers with cruising boats.. 48V to 12V converters are often quoted, cheap & dirty and okay for a day sailor but rarely a cruiser... Let us know how a converter works when your windlass, water maker or other high draw 12V motor load kicks in and toasts it.... This is yet one more way some companies try and get a foot in the door.. You really do not want to tap off a 48V bank for 12V use especially if solar and wind are your only means of recharging. This is another long involved discussion so suffice it to say keep your house bank.

In colder climates with cold water or early or late in the season you can literally cut your capacity by 1/3 or more due to battery temps.. Batteries are rated at 77F-80F and at colder temps, will not put up the same Ah capacity.

One of my customers was quoted an EC with AGM batteries using 80% DOD as average use. The math was also totally bogus and Peukert and water temp/battery case temp for the location chosen was completely and utterly ignored.

Sure you can get multiple years out of LifePO4 at 80% DOD but not a heck of a lot out of FLA or AGM unless you get back to 100% as fast as is humanly possible.... Even the best AGM's can only claim 400 cycles to 80% DOD (LiFePO4 2000+ cycles) but that is in a LABORATORY..

Real world, not lab derived numbers done under carefully controlled conditions, converted to 80% DOD numbers in the real world barely break 200 cycles for lead acid and this is with immediate and full recharges done quickly. Dilly dally on recharging from 80% DOD, using solar or wind, and sulfation will kill these banks faster than the cycles.

Here is some math from one of my customers quotes:

He was told he could easily go 50nm, the system was lighter and solar and wind could recharge him in 24 hours. None of it was true and it bordered on criminal, IMHO...:doh:The only part that was true was that he was told he just had to run his boat slower. Sill the 3 knot figure they threw out made zero sense mathematically.......


To go 50nm takes 16.6 hours at 3 knots SOG

A 5kW motor is pulling 104A at 5000W at 48V

If we figure he was using only 70% of that 5kW to do 3 knots that is a 73A load to the battery bank...

A 73A load on a 200Ah 48V bank with a 1.11 Peukert (AGM) gets you a 159Ah bank not 200Ah.. This must always be accounted for in good system design.

They also told him the batteries were best located in the keel sump (long full keel). At mid summer his keel sump temps peak at about 62F and off season in the 40's & 50's. This can bring usable bank capacity down to the 120Ah range. 80% of 120Ah's = 96 usable Ah's...

If you want to use 80% of the bank capacity at 73A you need to start at a Peukert corrected capacity of 159Ah's NOT at 200Ah's or you will be drawing the bank WAY below 80% DOD due to the high loads applied to it, which are well beyond the 20 hour rate for lead acid of 10A, which the bank was rated at. This is the most often ignored math EC conversion guys opt not to tell you about. The temp should also be accounted for.

So you have 127 (actual) Peukert corrected Ah's to use before you hit 80% DOD with a 73A load with an AGM bank (Lifeline).

If each hour of run time at a 70% load burns 73Ah he could not even go 5 miles at 3 knots before hitting 80% DOD.... How did they get to that lofty 50nm claim...?????? I have no idea......:confused::confused::confused::confused:

Even if we figure the motor at just 50% load/52A/48V you have a 165Ah bank (Peukert corrected/excluding temp) and 132 usable Ah's before hitting 80% DOD with a Peukert of 1.11... I am completely ignoring battery temp in this math which would make it even worse here in Maine....

Even a 50% load still barely gets to 7nm.... Again, how on Earth did they do the math that shows his boat getting to 50nm..???? :confused::confused::confused:

At 1000 watts or just 20% motor load you are still burning 21A at 48V.

21A X 16.6 hours @ 3 knots/50nm = -348.6 Ah's consumed...

There is no physical way he could get 16.6 hours out of a 200Ah bank even at just a 20% load....???? Thus the lofty, and completely bogus, 50nm range was a complete and utter lie based on the actual quoted system...

The only thing I can say to help you keep everyone around you honest in this research is to:

Trust Ohm's Law - Many will try to re-wire it, but as of yet no one has been successful..;)

Convert Watts to Amps at fixed voltage:

Watts ÷ Volts = Amps

eg:
5000W ÷ 12V = 417A
5000W ÷ 48V = 104A


Never Forget Peukert - When dealing with high load applications such as e-boats one simply can not ignore Peukerts Law when dealing with lead acid batteries..

A 100Ah lead acid battery is only a 100Ah battery when used at, and loaded at, 5A at 75-80F, when new or just broken in....

Every other load & temp range either above or below the 20 hour rate at 80F results in CHANGES the batteries 20 hour rated Ah capacity! Cycle, DOD, sulfation and plate erosion also impact Ah capacity.. Anyone telling you otherwise is really not qualified to be doing so.

LiFePO4 cells have minimal Peukert's corrections but they are still not a Peukert of 1.0..... A 100Ah battery with a 1.0 Peukert would provide 100Ah at a 300A load and conversely 100Ah at a 0.5A load. This simply does not exist in the real world... The reality is that a 100Ah LFP pack might provide about 80Ah at 300A (3C) and 115Ah at 0.5A..

Do that with a flooded lead acid 100Ah battery:

100Ah Battery - 300A Load = 33Ah

Caveat emptor, and please do your research....

Hybrid systems have a whole other set of considerations and a number of them are available Nani, Beta, Steyer etc... The above is for "E" only...
 
Nov 8, 2010
11,386
Beneteau First 36.7 & 260 Minneapolis MN & Bayfield WI
As a marine electrician, involved in electric conversions (EC's), all I can say is learn as much as you can and use REAL MATH... A lot of the proponents of EC's tend to mislead folks or tell partial truths in order to get in the door. I am on a number of electric boat forums and rarely do I ever hear someone mention the Peukert constant, battery temps or actual cycle life at 100% DOD which is where you wind up if you ignore Peukert etc......

Weight conversions are also most often misleading. They often pick the heaviest old school engines like the older Perkins 4-108 & the heaviest reversing gear, not a standard and considerably lighter Yanmar like the 3JH which is under 400 pounds with a Kanzaki or Hurth/Kanzaki.... They then entirely leave out the house bank when doing EC conversion math.. You can't really do that with a straight face.....

When we discuss battery weight we need to be cognizant of the fact that you will still need a 12V house bank. This was from an actual quote one of my customers received.

The 48V propulsion bank weighed 520 pounds but then the house bank may was another 130 or so pounds making for approx 650 pounds of batteries on a 28 foot boat. The house bank weight was left off any conversion calculations. If you are real energy conscious you could get away with a single 65 pound house bank but he wanted a minimum of 130Ah's to be able to easily power his windlass at 50% SOC....

With diesels you also have fuel capacity weight, which is not very light weight. A 20 gallon tank when full would weigh about 140 pounds +/-.. So in his case he had a 175 pound engine + 140 fuel = 315 pounds. With fuel filters and misc spares he was at about 360 pounds for engine and full fuel.

He was told the EC for his boat would weigh less? Really? Basic math often flies out the window when EC salesmen...

His quote was for an 8 battery bank which alone was approx 160 pounds heavier than the diesel engine & full fuel plus filters and spares. Of course the battery bank weight did not not the weight of the electric motor and associated gear which can be 100 pounds +/- with wire mounts, motor etc. This made his conversion nearly 260 pounds heavier not lighter as he was quoted.. You must be able to do accurate math for your own vessels conversion.

Not to mention he now had two battery systems, house/12V & electric / engine 48V at two different voltages but no large current source that could be directed at either. Sometimes an EC will weigh less but with lead acid batteries very often it does not.

On a 37 footer be sure you can physically fit enough solar and wind to charge two banks adequately in the time frame you would want in order to do 20 or 30 nautical mile runs.

E-power almost always requires a boat that is tied to a dock when done sailing or you wait a while between uses to recharge via solar & wind.....

By the time one gets done building a system like this fixing the diesel looks like a Kmart Blue Light special in comparison.

This is not to say e-power can't be done, it can be dove very suitably, if your use fits into the box.. Unfortunately "E" currently fits into a pretty tight box, range wise, for "E" only power.

To do these systems right, many are done very poorly using shoot from the hip math, can be very expensive and then you still need to replace expensive banks every few years. Or yearly, as one of my customer learned the hard way. He was mislead on his installation. Go figure, never seen that before..... :doh:

One must also keep in mind that the e conversion is only part of the expense. You also want wind and solar, and don't even think about the sub 1.5k wind gens as they are plain and simple wallet drains. A good quality wind gen and pole will run over 3k and still won't give you any sort of Ah recovery speed.

Also don't forget that you are charging two banks not one and at two different voltages.. Tapping off the propulsion bank for 12V is wrought with problems and I would not do that to any of my customers with cruising boats.. 48V to 12V converters are often quoted, cheap & dirty and okay for a day sailor but rarely a cruiser... Let us know how a converter works when your windlass, water maker or other high draw 12V motor load kicks in and toasts it.... This is yet one more way some companies try and get a foot in the door.. You really do not want to tap off a 48V bank for 12V use especially if solar and wind are your only means of recharging. This is another long involved discussion so suffice it to say keep your house bank.

In colder climates with cold water or early or late in the season you can literally cut your capacity by 1/3 or more due to battery temps.. Batteries are rated at 77F-80F and at colder temps, will not put up the same Ah capacity.

One of my customers was quoted an EC with AGM batteries using 80% DOD as average use. The math was also totally bogus and Peukert and water temp/battery case temp for the location chosen was completely and utterly ignored.

Sure you can get multiple years out of LifePO4 at 80% DOD but not a heck of a lot out of FLA or AGM unless you get back to 100% as fast as is humanly possible.... Even the best AGM's can only claim 400 cycles to 80% DOD (LiFePO4 2000+ cycles) but that is in a LABORATORY..

Real world, not lab derived numbers done under carefully controlled conditions, converted to 80% DOD numbers in the real world barely break 200 cycles for lead acid and this is with immediate and full recharges done quickly. Dilly dally on recharging from 80% DOD, using solar or wind, and sulfation will kill these banks faster than the cycles.

Here is some math from one of my customers quotes:

He was told he could easily go 50nm, the system was lighter and solar and wind could recharge him in 24 hours. None of it was true and it bordered on criminal, IMHO...:doh:The only part that was true was that he was told he just had to run his boat slower. Sill the 3 knot figure they threw out made zero sense mathematically.......


To go 50nm takes 16.6 hours at 3 knots SOG

A 5kW motor is pulling 104A at 5000W at 48V

If we figure he was using only 70% of that 5kW to do 3 knots that is a 73A load to the battery bank...

A 73A load on a 200Ah 48V bank with a 1.11 Peukert (AGM) gets you a 159Ah bank not 200Ah.. This must always be accounted for in good system design.

They also told him the batteries were best located in the keel sump (long full keel). At mid summer his keel sump temps peak at about 62F and off season in the 40's & 50's. This can bring usable bank capacity down to the 120Ah range. 80% of 120Ah's = 96 usable Ah's...

If you want to use 80% of the bank capacity at 73A you need to start at a Peukert corrected capacity of 159Ah's NOT at 200Ah's or you will be drawing the bank WAY below 80% DOD due to the high loads applied to it, which are well beyond the 20 hour rate for lead acid of 10A, which the bank was rated at. This is the most often ignored math EC conversion guys opt not to tell you about. The temp should also be accounted for.

So you have 127 (actual) Peukert corrected Ah's to use before you hit 80% DOD with a 73A load with an AGM bank (Lifeline).

If each hour of run time at a 70% load burns 73Ah he could not even go 5 miles at 3 knots before hitting 80% DOD.... How did they get to that lofty 50nm claim...?????? I have no idea......:confused::confused::confused::confused:

Even if we figure the motor at just 50% load/52A/48V you have a 165Ah bank (Peukert corrected/excluding temp) and 132 usable Ah's before hitting 80% DOD with a Peukert of 1.11... I am completely ignoring battery temp in this math which would make it even worse here in Maine....

Even a 50% load still barely gets to 7nm.... Again, how on Earth did they do the math that shows his boat getting to 50nm..???? :confused::confused::confused:

At 1000 watts or just 20% motor load you are still burning 21A at 48V.

21A X 16.6 hours @ 3 knots/50nm = -348.6 Ah's consumed...

There is no physical way he could get 16.6 hours out of a 200Ah bank even at just a 20% load....???? Thus the lofty, and completely bogus, 50nm range was a complete and utter lie based on the actual quoted system...

The only thing I can say to help you keep everyone around you honest in this research is to:

Trust Ohm's Law - Many will try to re-wire it, but as of yet no one has been successful..;)

Convert Watts to Amps at fixed voltage:

Watts ÷ Volts = Amps

eg:
5000W ÷ 12V = 417A
5000W ÷ 48V = 104A


Never Forget Peukert - When dealing with high load applications such as e-boats one simply can not ignore Peukerts Law when dealing with lead acid batteries..

A 100Ah lead acid battery is only a 100Ah battery when used at, and loaded at, 5A at 75-80F, when new or just broken in....

Every other load & temp range either above or below the 20 hour rate at 80F results in CHANGES the batteries 20 hour rated Ah capacity! Cycle, DOD, sulfation and plate erosion also impact Ah capacity.. Anyone telling you otherwise is really not qualified to be doing so.

LiFePO4 cells have minimal Peukert's corrections but they are still not a Peukert of 1.0..... A 100Ah battery with a 1.0 Peukert would provide 100Ah at a 300A load and conversely 100Ah at a 0.5A load. This simply does not exist in the real world... The reality is that a 100Ah LFP pack might provide about 80Ah at 300A (3C) and 115Ah at 0.5A..

Do that with a flooded lead acid 100Ah battery:

100Ah Battery - 300A Load = 33Ah

Caveat emptor, and please do your research....

Hybrid systems have a whole other set of considerations and a number of them are available Nani, Beta, Steyer etc... The above is for "E" only...
Maine, I'm humbled by the fact that you probably typed that in off the top of your head.
 

Gunni

.
Mar 16, 2010
5,937
Beneteau 411 Oceanis Annapolis
Just like with today's electric cars, the question of electric aux power on a sailboat is as much about practicality as it is about economy. The 'practicality' part is VERY personal and depends on your boat and sailing program. Read up, learn, and answer THAT question before even looking at the economic side. That will probably just about wash anyway.

Good learnings here.

http://www.electricyacht.com/
As someone who sails +70days/year and struggles to put 70 hrs on the auxiliary I'm more concerned with kind of hours I put on my engine. I literally plan outings just to run the engine for the factory specified 4 hours. Beyond practicality, I feel the need to collect a paycheck when I have to endure the drone of a diesel, and meet an arrival schedule.
 
Feb 6, 1998
11,701
Canadian Sailcraft 36T Casco Bay, ME
You got that right ... I'm humbled, too! MS, you must be some kind of chick magnet! ;)

If only the insurance adjuster I was supposed to meet for a lightning claim was a chick, and showed up on time... :D Thanks to him (not a her) not being prompt I had the time to type that.... D'oh....
 
May 23, 2004
3,319
I'm in the market as were . Colonial Beach
Hrm....Aren't our sailboats really hybrids anyways? We don't use power all of the time, only when we need it. Our fuel consumption is MUCH lower than a powerboat. When not using the engine we rely on wind power. Sounds like we are definitely hybrids......WHERE IS OUR TAX BREAK!:D
 
Nov 26, 2008
1,970
Endeavour 42 Cruisin
I have recently talked directly to more than one catamaran owner who removed their hybrid electric system and switched to all diesel...and burned less diesel after the switch...

real life, not hype
 
May 24, 2004
7,164
CC 30 South Florida
In cars I can understand as the average yearly fuel costs are exorbitant but a sailboat is the perfect hybrid with very low yearly fuel costs. I know people that barely spend $100 a year on fuel for their boat. Add that to a lower cost, less weight and space, ease of refueling and more power to fight wind and current that it makes no sense to look at electric at this time. I'm looking for an electric powered car but as far as the boat the wind power cannot be beat.
 
Jul 5, 2007
196
Kenner Privateer 26 schooner, Carlyle Illinois
I sail a lake in Illinois, which is 8 miles by 2 miles. When I built my schooner based on a Privateer 26 hull; I replaced the junk Volvo diesel with a 5 hp, 48 volt electric motor. I used the same prop and shaft, and reduced the drive 2-1 with a chain and sprockets. I use 4, 100 amp hr 12v batteries, and an electronic motor control. I use an onboard 48 volt charger. The total cost was just over $1000.00 and much less expensive than rebuilding the diesel and trans. The electric drive is quiet, smooth running, and requires no warm up, or oil changes. The cost of electric is included in my slip fee.

I've never had to run the battery bank under 55% because the wind died. In my lake; it's nearly the perfect system, and makes much more sense than a diesel engine on a lake this size.

p26schooner2 by okawbow, on Flickr
 
Dec 13, 2010
123
Hake 32RK Red Bank
Without wading into the energy debate here, I am currently in the Caribbean. I have a 2010 sailboat which I bought new with a 30 HP Yanmar diesel. When I return to the states, I plan to replace the diesel with an electric propulsion system and a small diesel powered genset. No not because of cost effectiveness but for capability. I have learned that motor sailing gives me better control in a seaway and an electric propulsion system does it with little/no noise, fumes, or heat. Getting an extra knot or cutting of 30 miles in a cruise matters. Finally, for those who have never experienced the torque performance of an electric motor vs an internal combustion engine not to mention the improved efficiency, I'd just suggest that the US Navy knows a bit more about the subject and they are going the Hybrid power route....fixed RPM diesel powering a genset that powers the variable speed electric drive