Yes.I guess he meant "things get a little hinky," as in precarious or unreliable.
Yes.I guess he meant "things get a little hinky," as in precarious or unreliable.
When things get hanky “ crazy, spirited, not planned. The CPT has been completely reliable. The clutch ( how I have my system orientated. ) is down low .I guess he meant "things get a little hinky," as in precarious or unreliable.
Yes, that does depend upon where you have it set-up. Where it is on my brothers 35.5 it's quite accessible.When things get hanky “ crazy, spirited, not planned. The CPT has been completely reliable. The clutch ( how I have my system orientated. ) is down low .
That's how we did the installation. Never has been problem in that geometry - very easy to just reach down and pull... I seem to remember that's called a reverse installation, but that might be related to the Combo of side plus geometry - it's too long ago now for my memory to have those details clear.I’ve considered reversing the drive motor so the clutch is to the stern.
Thank you :-D I have decided on the CPT as well. costs $2000 it generates 4-5 times the torque that a typical wheel drive pilot usesI’ve had my CPT for a couple years now and have been very happy with its performance. Open components have not been a issue at all. The only issue I have with it is the clutch can be difficult to reach down to disengage when hinge get a little hanky.
You won't be disappointed. I know several full time cruisers crossing oceans with these and I've heard nothing but praise.Thank you :-D I have decided on the CPT as well. costs $2000 it generates 4-5 times the torque that a typical wheel drive pilot uses
"The CPT can produce up to 86 ft-lbs (116 Nm) of torque to your vessel's steering wheel. This would be the same force as hanging an 86 lb weight (or two 5-gallon water jugs) from one of your wheel's spokes one foot out from the center. Other wheel pilots may typically only produce 30Nm, or 22 ft-lbs of torque."
The point I will quibble with is the use of the term "course." Based on what I infer about the design of this pilot, it is not a course-keeping pilot, but a heading-keeping pilot. The CPT will keep you on the heading that you are on when you enable it. It will not, can not, hold a course, magnetic or otherwise, since it has no data about current, COG, or anything else like that. So, if you rewrite this answer substituting "heading" for 'course,' it is correct.How is the CPT different from other autopilots?
The CPT is a rugged stand-alone autopilot that keeps a vessel on a magnetic compass course. With your boat on course, set the CPT and it will steer and keep your boat on that course, rain or shine. It is a course-keeping autopilot. For simplicity and reliability it does not have connections to rudder transducers, GPS, or other electronics. The CPT is designed for immersion and cockpit mounting, and is powerful enough to steer heavy displacement boats.
The teeth on the belt, wheel, and clutch eliminate slipping. The simple to use manual clutch engages the drive, and also provides emergency overload protection.
Please be aware that a magnetic compass course is not the same as a GPS course. In keeping to a good average compass course, your vessel will still be subject to drift from wind and currents. This is apparent when observing your GPS over time, and on a passage you will still need to navigate and make periodic adjustments.
The Raymarine EV100 series AP has it’s limitations. All systems req some form of compromise. Only the boat owner can truly decide what is acceptable.
The CPT system is a good system. It is more robust. It costs about 80% more. It has exposed moving mechanical systems in the cockpit that can endanger the use
exactly the CPT is a heading-keeping pilot only. & from what I heard of everyone who has one. they say it is reliable in doing just that holding a heading. & is what I want my AP to doSo, a sidebar, but I read the CPT web site - I think all of it - and there's a nit I'd like to pick. It could be a misunderstanding on my part, or I could be right. And, we can all have a good argument/discussion about it here, unless the OP objects, at which pint I will desist.
Don't get me wrong! I'm not knocking the CPT pilot. I respect that they've developed a robust, "bullet proof" pilot that is strong, reliable, repairable, essentially waterproof, and that they've been in business with this for a long time. That's a testament to the product and the satisfied customers.
The website says this, as an answer to a "common question:"
(here's the page: Common Questions)
The point I will quibble with is the use of the term "course." Based on what I infer about the design of this pilot, it is not a course-keeping pilot, but a heading-keeping pilot. The CPT will keep you on the heading that you are on when you enable it. It will not, can not, hold a course, magnetic or otherwise, since it has no data about current, COG, or anything else like that. So, if you rewrite this answer substituting "heading" for 'course,' it is correct.
Interestingly, they state correctly that it holds a heading on the "Features" page:
"Flip the toggle up to hold heading and the autopilot will maintain the current heading." And even the legend on the control panel says "HOLD HEADING" and "STANDBY" for the two positions of the toggle switch.
So, generally correct, except for whoever wrote that answer.
That said, it would be cool if there was an option to turn over control of the wheel drive to an autopilot computer, and if there was a magnetic clutch option. The former would probably be easy to accomplish, and you could add a toggle switch for "CPT of EXTERNAL" computer.