I will check when I am on the boat tomorrow.Make sure that the "Switch circuit function" is not set to "enable" , as it will turn off the battery. Go to settings on your suspect battery and you will find it about half way down.
I don't see anything wrong.I don’t want to hijack @SycloneDriver’s post, but this is AlFP system related, so hopefully not egregious… if I should start a new thread, please comment,
I was checking my new Humseink LifePo4 batteries today after the batteries have been on the charger for a few days. Batt 1 showed 100% SOC and Batt 2 showed 99%. Interestingly, the BMS on Batt 1 shut off the charging switch. I assume since it was at 100% and couldn’t accept any more charge. The batteries are paralleled (see photo below).
View attachment 233092
I went out for a 2.5 hour sail today, with a light load on the house bank (fridge, VHF, stereo, CP & instruments).
When I got back, I left the charger off until I could check the BMS for the 2 batteries. Now, Batt 1 still showed 100% SOC and batt 2 was at 86% SOC.
I am not sure why these batteries, if wired in parallel, would not supply power to the house system in equal measure. Instead, it seems that one battery is doing all of the work
View attachment 233093 View attachment 233094
I have written to Humseink to see what they can tell me (if anything). I have discovered that their BMS app will not let me see what the individual cells are doing. They did say that their engineers are working on an upgrade to the app.
So, here is a crude drawing of my DC system (left out the AC side of the equation for now)...and only the house side. Left off the starter battery, switch, charger, etc for that.
View attachment 233095
Does anyone see anything blatantly wrong with this set up (I hope not, as I have sailed with it a few times now). Or could this just an issue with the batteries? One thing I could try is to install a positive and negative bus bars and hook each battery individuslly to the bus bars. But the charger would charge the bus bars (single output charger ). Not sure that changes things much. Does paralleling LFP batteries need to be different than FLA?
Greg
This can happen when the individual cells in a battery are not balanced. The BMS will continue accepting a charge until all the cells are balanced at (or very close to) the same voltage. In use the cells will not charge or discharge evenly, top balancing returns them to equal voltages. This is pretty normal behavior for LFP batteries.I was checking my new Humseink LifePo4 batteries today after the batteries have been on the charger for a few days. Batt 1 showed 100% SOC and Batt 2 showed 99%. Interestingly, the BMS on Batt 1 shut off the charging switch. I assume since it was at 100% and couldn’t accept any more charge. The batteries are paralleled (see photo below).
Hi Troy,I don't see anything wrong.
I am curious as to what you have the charge and maintenance voltages set at in the charger?
Does the alternator have a programmable regulator?
Thanks Dave,This can happen when the individual cells in a battery are not balanced. The BMS will continue accepting a charge until all the cells are balanced at (or very close to) the same voltage. In use the cells will not charge or discharge evenly, top balancing returns them to equal voltages. This is pretty normal behavior for LFP batteries.
The other problem, uneven discharge between the 2 batteries seems more unusual. It may take a few charge/discharge cycles for the BMS to learn the SOC. The usual causes for the imbalance between the 2 batteries are uneven jumper lengths or the manner in which the batteries are put in parallel. The way you have wired the batteries was once the recommended method, it is still fine, however, current thinking has the batteries connected to a bus bar to parallel them and the loads taken off the bus. Buried somewhere on the Victron site is a basic wiring manual that shows the different methods of paralleling batteries. There may also be information on Calder's site, www.BoatHowTo.com.
While we're looking at the photos, the DC+ wires all need to be fused. One of the dangers of LFP batteries is the amount of current they can discharge in a short time. There should only be 2 DC+ connections on the battery, the jumper from B1 and B2 and the cable to a Class T fuse. A Class T fuse should be used because it has a higher interrupt level (AIC) than other fuses. If there is a short the power delivered from an LFP battery can arc across a blown fuse. Class T fuses prevent the arcing. All the wires after the Class T fuse can be fused with other styles of fuses. ATC fuses in inline holders or a Blue Seas fuse box will work. The fuse box is a bit neater.
”Bulk” is not a voltage setting. It is maximum current that the charger can apply. With a discharged battery, the voltage at that current will initially be below the absorption voltage setting. As the battery SOC gets higher, its voltage will rise. Once the programmed absorption voltage is reached the charger will reduce the charge current so as not to exceed the absorption voltage setting.It doesn’t say what the “bulk” setting is. I think it is around 13.5 or so.
I'm not familiar with that brand of battery, but 13.2V is too low a float voltage for lifepo4 chemistry.... ideally 13.5-13.8V. In the case of lithium, absorption = bulk........ I also need to add a DC to DC charger.
I have reprogrammed the charge and float settings on my Pronautic P1230 charger. I set it at 14.2 charge and 13.2 float. I verified that it stopped charging when the battery was full.
The alternator is presently connected to both the house and start battery though an isolator. With the charger on and the engine running the charge current was at about 45 amps. I ran the engine for about 5 minutes at cruise rpm and the alternator barely got warm. The charger is only connected to the house battery. It pumped out 30 anps for hours, it got very warm.
...
GregI was checking my new Humseink LifePo4 batteries today after the batteries have been on the charger for a few days. Batt 1 showed 100% SOC and Batt 2 showed 99%. Interestingly, the BMS on Batt 1 shut off the charging switch. I assume since it was at 100% and couldn’t accept any more charge. The batteries are paralleled (see photo below).
View attachment 233092
I went out for a 2.5 hour sail today, with a light load on the house bank (fridge, VHF, stereo, CP & instruments).
When I got back, I left the charger off until I could check the BMS for the 2 batteries. Now, Batt 1 still showed 100% SOC and batt 2 was at 86% SOC.
I am not sure why these batteries, if wired in parallel, would not supply power to the house system in equal measure. Instead, it seems that one battery is doing all of the work
View attachment 233093 View attachment 233094
I have written to Humseink to see what they can tell me (if anything). I have discovered that their BMS app will not let me see what the individual cells are doing. They did say that their engineers are working on an upgrade to the app.
So, here is a crude drawing of my DC system (left out the AC side of the equation for now)...and only the house side. Left off the starter battery, switch, charger, etc for that.
View attachment 233095
Does anyone see anything blatantly wrong with this set up (I hope not, as I have sailed with it a few times now). Or could this just an issue with the batteries? One thing I could try is to install a positive and negative bus bars and hook each battery individuslly to the bus bars. But the charger would charge the bus bars (single output charger ). Not sure that changes things much. Does paralleling LFP batteries need to be different than FLA?