This is such an interesting debate to follow...![]()
This is such an interesting debate to follow...![]()
Rut Roh!!It isn't that these points aren't good points, they are but...Crazy.
I agree it doesn’t actually drive anything…and I am still unsure how it generates electricity. The engine itself doesnt. They have to capture the exhaust gas and drive some sort of turbine maybe.If I understand correctly, this engine does not "drive" anything and there is no rotational output to connect to any load. What I saw was a very effecient motor-generator which produces electricity which is in turn used to drive things. Not sure if it make AC or DC but that really wouldn't matter much.
In boats, I could see it being very useful in a series hybrid system where it could product power to run the propulsion motors directly or recharge the battery bank.
I am willing to be a Geni pig and let my boat be used as a test bed.
It still needs something to convert axial motion into rotational motion. Like a crankshaft in an IC engine.I agree it doesn’t actually drive anything…and I am still unsure how it generates electricity.
Now you're getting into cogeneration for additional efficiency. Sounds like you got money. We should get together some time :They have to capture the exhaust gas and drive some sort of turbine maybe.
Of course I forgot to answer the original question when I posted #24.I ask you @Ralph Johnstone, if the state of the current technology is such that diesel engines are not even reaching 50% and the theoretical limit as calculated by R. Diesel was 75%, is there not room for improvement?
Not really. Your starting temperature (pressure) and the exhaust temperature (pressure) are both measured above the same ambient so no need for a △T in either the high or low temperatures.but there has to be an initial ambient temperature, so there should really be a delta expression here that reflects that.
For and ambient temperature of TA you would have to do something like,Not really. Your starting temperature (pressure) and the exhaust temperature (pressure) are both measured above the same ambient so no need for a △T in either the high or low temperatures.
I remember reading something about 20 years ago ... about a "X-Challenge" by GM to the first team that could find a process that would allow for the production of a cubic meter of pure Teflon. I did the google thing but could not find it.Rut Roh!!
View attachment 213259
Ask @Will Gilmore about Entropy and Energy.
As explained by an Engineer who did his Thesis on this Subject [me]
Engineer Jim...
Melting point of Teflon® = 705°FIf we could develop a cubic meter of pure Teflon, then engine blocks could be made of Teflon
Will, you have a good grasp of thermodynamics, so you asked for it. Here's the nasty (but actual) version.It doesn't just cancel itself out.
Go Sailing!!diesel engines alone performing at 35% efficiency levels, what can be done?
Taken from my previous post #28 :With more than 100% improvement possible based on R Diesels calculations within the Carnot Cycle, for diesel engines alone performing at 35% efficiency levels, what can be done?
Unless someone comes up with a "modified" diesel engine that works on a cycle other than the Carnot Cycle, the equation says it all. Right now, we don't have the metallurgy for higher temperatures and we can't exhaust into a perfect vacuum. Back to the drawing board I guess.Of course there's room for improvement. Looking at the equation for efficiency in a Carnot cycle :
![]()
the way to make that fraction bigger is to make Th larger by higher compression and/or a hotter fire in the cylinder)
AND/OR
make Tl smaller by exhausting into a vacuum.
unfortunately much easier said than done.