As I read your response I realize I have done a poor job of communicating the larger underlying points. I agree that good solid state gear has flatter curves. I apologize for using the same scale for both hand-drawn charts. I DID state clearly that the Y-Axis value was completely arbitrary though!!!I'm not sure I do. What you drew is simply not true for consumers and therefore misleading. I'd be interested in seeing a consumer HiFi stereo amp that has a THD/power relationship like the one you drew. My experience says they look like the actual plot you posted later, or like the one below. Basically flat until you hit rated power, then through the roof.
The takeaway in context to the rest of the discussion is this:
1) Even with HiFi gear, the consumer makes a judgement based on data that does not reflect real-world listening. THD +N is stated at RATED POWER, not normal listening levels.
2) For a HiFi solid state amp, its lowest point of distortion is at full rated power and at lower power levels, i.e. normal listening levels, the distortion is higher. We both will agree it is not much higher, and in fact pretty low. The key point is that advertised specs state distortion at its lowest which is not normal listening level. Remember we started this discussion with the BS "Peak Power" discussion...
3) A clipped solid state amp has a non-musical odd-order harmonic component that is to be subjective, non-musical.
4) Any tube amp, new or used, tested to the same CEA spec will have its distortion measured at rated power. as a result the result will be a distortion number that is higher than what one would experience at normal listening levels.
5) At normal listening levels the consumer will experience lower distortion than the spec suggests.
6) a clipped tube amp has even-order harmonics that are not as offensive to the human ear.
I think this last point might in large part contribute to Nick's statement that his relatively small tube amps seemed like they had more power. Surely you agree with these points?
We could go WAY in the weeds on this, but its not necessary as I don't disagree with you. I think this all comes down to my arbitrary assignment of 10% on the Y-axis, which seems to be the only thing at issue. In hindsight, it would be more fair to have two charts that had two different %THD values along the Y-axis... Sorry for the confusion...