M
Mark
Well...
From Dan W"Hunter, Catalina, Beneteau, any mass produced sailboat:Mast and rigging is too light.Hull is thinPoor sailing performanceGood under powerCheap interior"I really can't let that one stand. If anything the rigging on Catalina's above, 28 feet, if far to oversized and adds unnecessary weight aloft thus reducing the sailing performance slightly compared to a lighter rig. I used to work in a boat yard and can tell you for a fact that the wire (stay) sizes on Catalina's are at least one full size larger than most boats for their size including boats from Tartan, Pearson, C&C and Niagra. I used to work on a Niagra 35, a boat NOBODY would dispute as a cheap production boat, and most all would classify as a Blue Water boat, and a Catalina 36. Though the Catalina was certainly no ocean crosser the Catalina's stays were 3/8 and the Niagras were 5/16 and both boats had very similar spar extrusions although with the shorter height of the Niagra rig it's mast was obviously lighter in total weight.Hull is to thin? Really show me some documented cases of a Catalina or Beneteau over 28 feet with a catastrophic hull failure? Poor sailing performance? In the late 70's I raced on a Catalina 38 that used to beat everything and I now race on a Beneteau that also beats the pants of most all boats we come up against. While these boats are no J Boats in terms of performance and light weight construction they do sail quite well and will beat he pants off many higher quality boats such as an Island Packet, Niagra, CapeDory, Allied etc. etc.. I happen to own a Cape Dory another well built, blue water, boat and I get my ass kicked by Catalina's, Hunters and Beneteau's on a regular basis and by sailors who don't even know how to sail them. I can regularly and easily get my friends Catalina 320 over 7 knots although he has a tough time breaking 6.5. The sailor makes the most difference.Cheap Interior: Well yes cheaper than smaller builders who hand make all the joinery by hand like Sabre. But a Sabre 38 equipped the same as a Catalina or Beneteau 38 will cost double $$ what the production boats do but certainly won't give you double the fun. Catalina actually still builds with a real teak interior and there are very few builders doing that any more no matter how little wood is below. None of these boats has anywhere close to the forest of teak I have but for most teak above and below decks requires maintenance something most don’t have time for.Someone comparing a Macgregor to a Catalina, Hunter or Beneteau in terms of quality started this whole mess. Having worked on a few Macgregors over the years, while at the boat yard in the 80's, I can tell you they are no Catalina, Hunter or Beneteau but for their intended purpose, lake and protected bay sailing, they don't need to be built that way. I have sailed, on separate occasions, both a Beneteau and a Catalina off shore from RI to Halifax (Catalina) and RI to Saint John's Newfoundland (Beneteau). I would NEVER set foot on a delivery of a Macgregor anywhere in the open ocean. Nothing against them and like I said before for their purpose they are plenty strong and seaworthy but for open ocean sailing they are borderline dangerous.Let's all take a look back at the original post for a minute. He said and I quote:"But I would love a boat to take down the ICW to NC and possibly to the keys one day."If you have ever done the ICW from Virginia to the Key's then you know a Macgregor is NOT the boat for this trip especially for someone with NO sailing experience. Now if he had said he was going to stay in the Chess and the estuaries/rivers a Macgregor would be a fine choice. We need to keep in mind the potential uses. What was in the original post is why people are steering him away from a Macgregor and it is not an intentional slam on the Macgregor's.
From Dan W"Hunter, Catalina, Beneteau, any mass produced sailboat:Mast and rigging is too light.Hull is thinPoor sailing performanceGood under powerCheap interior"I really can't let that one stand. If anything the rigging on Catalina's above, 28 feet, if far to oversized and adds unnecessary weight aloft thus reducing the sailing performance slightly compared to a lighter rig. I used to work in a boat yard and can tell you for a fact that the wire (stay) sizes on Catalina's are at least one full size larger than most boats for their size including boats from Tartan, Pearson, C&C and Niagra. I used to work on a Niagra 35, a boat NOBODY would dispute as a cheap production boat, and most all would classify as a Blue Water boat, and a Catalina 36. Though the Catalina was certainly no ocean crosser the Catalina's stays were 3/8 and the Niagras were 5/16 and both boats had very similar spar extrusions although with the shorter height of the Niagra rig it's mast was obviously lighter in total weight.Hull is to thin? Really show me some documented cases of a Catalina or Beneteau over 28 feet with a catastrophic hull failure? Poor sailing performance? In the late 70's I raced on a Catalina 38 that used to beat everything and I now race on a Beneteau that also beats the pants of most all boats we come up against. While these boats are no J Boats in terms of performance and light weight construction they do sail quite well and will beat he pants off many higher quality boats such as an Island Packet, Niagra, CapeDory, Allied etc. etc.. I happen to own a Cape Dory another well built, blue water, boat and I get my ass kicked by Catalina's, Hunters and Beneteau's on a regular basis and by sailors who don't even know how to sail them. I can regularly and easily get my friends Catalina 320 over 7 knots although he has a tough time breaking 6.5. The sailor makes the most difference.Cheap Interior: Well yes cheaper than smaller builders who hand make all the joinery by hand like Sabre. But a Sabre 38 equipped the same as a Catalina or Beneteau 38 will cost double $$ what the production boats do but certainly won't give you double the fun. Catalina actually still builds with a real teak interior and there are very few builders doing that any more no matter how little wood is below. None of these boats has anywhere close to the forest of teak I have but for most teak above and below decks requires maintenance something most don’t have time for.Someone comparing a Macgregor to a Catalina, Hunter or Beneteau in terms of quality started this whole mess. Having worked on a few Macgregors over the years, while at the boat yard in the 80's, I can tell you they are no Catalina, Hunter or Beneteau but for their intended purpose, lake and protected bay sailing, they don't need to be built that way. I have sailed, on separate occasions, both a Beneteau and a Catalina off shore from RI to Halifax (Catalina) and RI to Saint John's Newfoundland (Beneteau). I would NEVER set foot on a delivery of a Macgregor anywhere in the open ocean. Nothing against them and like I said before for their purpose they are plenty strong and seaworthy but for open ocean sailing they are borderline dangerous.Let's all take a look back at the original post for a minute. He said and I quote:"But I would love a boat to take down the ICW to NC and possibly to the keys one day."If you have ever done the ICW from Virginia to the Key's then you know a Macgregor is NOT the boat for this trip especially for someone with NO sailing experience. Now if he had said he was going to stay in the Chess and the estuaries/rivers a Macgregor would be a fine choice. We need to keep in mind the potential uses. What was in the original post is why people are steering him away from a Macgregor and it is not an intentional slam on the Macgregor's.