Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sailors

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 18, 2010
2,441
Catalina 310 Hingham, MA
I have recently made a new friend. He is a 25 year old sailor from Poland. He has been sailing for most of his life and sounds to be very experienced for his age. He and I have talked a fair amount about the differences in sailing in our areas.
One of the differences we have discussed is the requirement for training and certification in sailing. In his area, and I believe much of Europe, you need to be certified for both inshore sailing and offshore sailing. I probably don’t have the exact details correct but the inshore sailing certification would let you sail in the lakes, canals and within 5 miles of land. He has been working teaching sailing and is trying to become certified as an inshore instructor. He also is becoming certified for offshore and has been doing some crewing on offshore passages to gain experience.
Another key difference we have been discussing is the quality of boats where he sails. Poland is one of the larger centers for boat building and many large boat builders like Jeanneau and Sea Ray build boats in Poland. However, the vast majority of these boats are shipped elsewhere. Most boats in use in this area are 30 or more years old. It is very common to still have wooden boats. Several of his offshore passages have been on wooden boats where they are repairing leaks and constantly bailing water throughout the passage.

I met him about three weeks ago when he showed up at the marina and started working on a 36 foot Derbeck center cockpit, cutter/ketch. It’s a really stout looking boat that I have had my eye on for some time and was considering asking the marina about the status of the boat just before I saw him working on it. The boat has been sitting on the hard for at least 4 – 6 years. None of us at the marina can remember the last time it was in the water. The boat looked like it had good bones but needed a lot of TLC to get it back to passage making shape.

After getting to take a closer look, there is a brand new Yanmar diesel (less than 50 hours), an electrical system that was entirely rewired probably 10 years ago with all red wires (you can’t tell what is the positive or negative wires without tracing it back), original brass seacocks throughout the boat (almost all of which are frozen open), practically brand new sails (all 4 of them from Doyle and still crisp) and 10 or more years old electronics (2 loran systems, SSB & VHF radios with dials not digital displays, an old Garmin GPS and a Raytheon radar). The plumbing system seems to have been redone at some point but I saw a lot of “dead ends” which are breeding grounds for bacteria. The water pressure pump is broken (not winterized properly); there is a hand pump at the galley sink but none onboard knew what it was for until I showed them. The cabin top was designed to be slightly concaved and there are drain plugs that would allow collected rain water to go directly into both of the 50 gallon water tanks (one on each side). All of the running rigging is at least 15 years old and it has been sitting out uncovered for the 4-6 years the boat was on the hard. All of the halyards are rope to wire splices (most of them don’t look good to me). Based on soundings of the hull there does not appear to be any delamination (solid glass hull, no core) but there is delamination on the rudder. There used to be solar panels but they were stolen last summer. Now mind you, this is my list after only spending about 2 hours on the boat.

So the 25 year old Polish sailor, Mike, met the owner, Chris, in Poland; the owner is a certified offshore sailor. Chris bought the boat for $12,000 last year based on photos and had never seen the boat or had it surveyed. I don’t know the details of the agreement but I suspect that Mike is working for free but Chris is covering the cost of any supplies and Mike’s living expenses while working on the boat. Mike flew in from Poland 3 weeks ago to begin getting this boat ready to go in the water. He has cleaned the boat, inspected some of the system (I don’t believe he is very experienced on the maintenance side of boats), replaced batteries, installed a Humming Bird Fish Finder/GPS Unit, epoxied a 5” whole from an old transducer that was installed in a wooden block that was rotten, painted the bottom and put epoxy on the outside of the rudder but didn’t pull it apart and deal with the delamination. Chris flew out on Thursday of last week to begin helping. Chris also somehow found an American from Florida who is also helping and along for the ride but he has never been on a boat before so he offers nothing but another set of hands.

Here are the things I know that were never addressed before the boat went in the water: the engine was never run, the electrical system was never fully inspected or tested (they installed the Humming Bird unit, tried it and saw that it was not working correctly and they had cabin lights), none of the existing electronics were working, the water tanks were never flushed or inspected, the blackwater system was never tested or inspected, and all of the running and standing rigging was never inspected or changed.

The boat launched yesterday at 9AM. Their original plan was to sail out at 9PM last night on the outgoing tide to head for Nova Scotia (New Scotland as they call it). From there on to either Galloway or Portugal depending on the wind. They estimate it would take 2 weeks to complete this trip.

I went down to the boat last night to see them off at 7 PM. At that time, they still hadn’t started the engine, checked out the electrical system or any of the plumbing. They had purchased about $300 of provisions from the Stop N Shop across the street and Chris and the guy from Florida were at the dollar store getting can openers, forks, plates, etc. Oh, and they had refilled the propane tanks for the stove but had not tested the stove yet. They had a camping propane stove for a backup.

I went on the boat because Mike could not find the shore power connection and wanted to charge the batteries. I found that the AC side of the electrical had been disconnected from any connection for shore power (the bare wires were in one of the cabinets). They also had water pouring in through the strainer that was not connected to the engine. The bilge pump was off and the bilge was almost filled with water. I tried to close the seacock and it was frozen. We connected the hose to the water pump and found out that the top of the strainer could not be all the way secured due to a broken bolt. We were able to get it to hold but the bolt needed to be replaced to really fix it.

Since we had the water connected, they wanted to start the engine. I guess they tried to bet a mechanic to come and look at the engine. However, they didn’t look for someone until Sunday and were surprised they didn’t get anyone to call them back. We looked at the electrical set up and it seemed strange because it had one battery switch that was the typical “1-2-All-Off” switch. The other was “1-Accessory(from a label maker)-Off”. The “1” was connected to the starter and the “Accessory” was connected to the windless. The typical switch was connected to the house bank of 3 batteries in parallel (“2”) and a new group 27 deep cycle starter battery (“1”) they installed new that morning. We changed both switches to 1 and we heard popping and sizzling then smelled smoke. The terminals on the starter battery had literally melted off. (See Photos) My guess is someone crossed a positive line with a negative, which would be easy to do since they were all red with no way to tell them apart easily.

After all this, Chris was still considering leaving port on the morning outgoing tide. He thought he could sail out to open ocean (did I mention that the only charts they had were 15+ year old paper charts of the Boston area and nothing for either of their Europe landing points) and just set course for Europe. (At this point Mike did start looking at his exit strategy.) They did final decide to try and get someone to look at the electrical system and engine and delay leaving for a little bit to get that worked out. But I wouldn’t be surprised if I go down there tonight and they are gone.

So to my original premise in the title, are American sailors more over cautious then European sailors? It took all of these events for these two, experienced European sailors to finally delay their departure. I would have backed out at so many different points in the last 2-3 weeks. To be honest, if I showed up and saw the condition of the boat and knew the time frame I would have just left.

The items/defects I listed above that I noticed on their boat are items on my prelaunch check list to be done every year. So to launch a boat without checking these seems a bit crazy to me as well.

Also, to contemplate the journey with no “shake down” seems insane to me. We do 3-4 “shake down” sails at the beginning of each season before we would even consider doing even a 40 kn cruise that only takes us 5-10 km offshore.

This still doesn’t even address the list of spare parts and emergency equipment I keep. They had one set (4) current flares, a used and untested emergency raft, no harnesses or jack lines and had returned their sat phone for an In Reach because they couldn’t figure out the sat phone. They had some spares but no inventory to know what they had and no plans to get other spares.

While I think this maybe way over the top unsafe, it does make me think that maybe I am too cautious. Maybe there is a better balance to be reach and not being so paranoid that everything could go wrong.

So what do you guys think?
 

Attachments

Nov 6, 2006
10,068
Hunter 34 Mandeville Louisiana
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

A major triumph of ignorant youthful exuberance and confidence over common sense.. It happens.. It is OK to be adventurous and exuberant as long as the basics are covered.. doesn't sound like these guys are being wise about choices and will be putting other people at risk as a result.. I will defend their right to go, however.. I do think that they could use a little more knowledge of the boat and its systems..
EDIT: re-reading the story, I feel a couple of things.. 1 they may be pulling your leg to watch you wiggle.. and more likely 2, the lead guy is not really experienced at all in passage making
 
Nov 18, 2010
2,441
Catalina 310 Hingham, MA
The funny part is, the 25-year old Mike is showing more commonsense then the owner, Chris probably in his 50s, and the guy from Florida, who is in his late 40s.
 
Oct 2, 2006
1,517
Jboat J24 commack
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

I have to think they ARE REALLY REALLY REALLY bad at repiars to MISS that many things

The whole thing sounds pretty Darwin
 
Oct 26, 2008
6,247
Catalina 320 Barnegat, NJ
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

Mike has more years ahead of him ... maybe the other two aren't that worried about losing the last few ...
 
Jul 28, 2010
914
Boston Whaler Montauk New Orleans
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

JK, without regard to these bozos, and I can't speak to other European countries, but I do know that the U.K.'s certification process is much stricter than the US equivalents (ASA and USAA). I know and have sailed with two people who are "Yacht Masters" through the Royal Yachting Association there, and what they had to go through would make you shiver. One thing they had to do (I believe it was their final exam) was skipper the boat from below, with the windows blacked out, and only paper charts to look at. They had to rely only on verbal responses from the crew up above in order to give appropriate commands and navigate to the destination. And I though ded reckoning was tough!

Even the RYA certs for the lower levels are generally tougher than those in the U.S. sailing certifying companies.

My wife and I have bareboat chartered in Greece and the Caribbean several times. The Caribbean is definitely less strict. Two outfits in Europe wouldn't accept an ASA or USAA certification. They wanted an RYA certification.
 
Dec 2, 2003
1,637
Hunter 376 Warsash, England --
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

FWIW:- I have sailed in most countries of Europe over the last couple of decades or so (except in Poland!) and nowhere I have come across is it mandatory to be certified as to one's sailing skills before going afloat in command of one's own boat.
Of course it is strongly recommended that sailors do take a qualification and most certainly before taking any passengers on charter or for hire. On most inland waters and rivers all boats need licences but not necessarily their skippers.
Trainers and instructors need to have licences but, for the remainder, it is one of the last great freedoms to be able just to get into a boat and take off.

Many who do just that often end up being 'rescued' by the lifeboat services which are mostly manned by volunteers.
Ig going 'foreign' please see my addendum to this - message no # 33.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NYSail

.
Jan 6, 2006
3,137
Beneteau 423 Mt. Sinai, NY
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

Well I have two stories

My first boat..1977 Cal 34 III. When I bought my current boat I put the Cal on Craigs list. A couple days later I get an e-mail from a guy from St. petersburg who is very interested. I assume Florida. He has a friend here in NY that is familiar with sail boats and askes if he could come take a look. The guy shows up, love the boat... It was in great condition and tells his friend. His friend calls me and says he wants the boat... then he says he is from Russia and will be flying over in 2 weeks to get the boat. Then... he asked for my bank account info and he will wire all funds promptly. This is where I thought SCAM. I told him that just for the story alone I will hold the boat for him and that he would have to pay in cash. He came, cash was real, he worked on the boat for 2 weeks hopped on an took it to the Azors in 20 days, then off to Russia. Most important thing he paid attention to was the compass.... he was a very able sailor.

This summer I bumped into two Lithuanians that had just bought a boat in Maine that were getting ready to do the same.

When I asked both guys why come here to buy a boat, they said there are only brand new or real old boats to be bought in Europe. Also, the taxes and all registration fees when buying a boat there doubles the purchase price. So buying a boat here and sailing it back for them makes scense.
 
May 24, 2004
7,164
CC 30 South Florida
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

Perhaps we we need to compare apples to apples. Perhaps an American sailor in the 1960s would compare favorably with today's Polish counterpart. We now have big fiberglass boats loaded with all kinds of electronics and don't have to deal with wooden boats and navigate by compass. We have to remeber Poland was a communist country and during the years between 1939 and 1990 I doubt very few pleasure crafts were produced or imported into the country. I can understand a boat being wired with all red wires if that is all that is available.
 

Joe

.
Jun 1, 2004
8,175
Catalina 27 Mission Bay, San Diego
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

JK, the length of your article says a lot about your question.
 

Joe

.
Jun 1, 2004
8,175
Catalina 27 Mission Bay, San Diego
Please explain.
Well, JK, you asked a general question and then supported your view with a very lengthy, minutely detailed essay. So.... just by examing your post it is very clear that you are an extremely, overly cautious sailor...... but you have failed to convince me that it is a Europe vs. American phenomenon. It is You vs. the one european sailor that you do know..

This is not meant to be critical of you in any way...... it's just a comment on the similarity between your own acceptable level of sailing precaution and the way you communicate it to others. If my explanation makes no sense.... I completely understand the confusion and you have my permission to label me and my comments as totally "irrelevant".

The essence of your premise is understandable to me in this respect..... I feel that europeans, and australians, in general are more "ADVENTUROUS" than the typical american sailor......... but I can't really back it up with hard evidence...... it's just my gut feeling.... perhaps you could steer the conversation in that direction.... rather than one group being more cautious than the other.... what do you think?
 
Jul 29, 2010
1,392
Macgregor 76 V-25 #928 Lake Mead, Nevada
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

I'd like to boil this down. Been sailing for 40+ years. Even gave a few sailing lessons. If you want to see the need for some sort of training, vis-a-vis port from starboard, rules of the road, right of way etc., just go down to any busy Marina on a weekend. Marina Del Rey, Cal is a great example. There you see folks who don't know the bow from keel moving around in one of the busiest small boat harbors in the world in craft that cost more than their house. I started out knowing nothing and knew I knew nothing. I relied on experienced sailors for training and advice. I've seen things that scared the H... out of me and yet the newbies are oblivious and in some cases arogant. You have to have a license to drive a car, you have to have a license to go fishing, you need a license to go hunting, you even need a license to get married. There is nothing preventing anyone from buying a boat worth tens of thousands and setting off an a cruise to disaster. I have seen young kids driving 454 cu in dragboats on Lake Mead and have seen the fatal results of ignorance and plain stupidity mixed with copious amounts of alcohol. I am not advocating licensure but a little knowledge is not a bad thing.
 

Pat

.
Jun 7, 2004
1,250
Oday 272LE Ninnescah Yacht Club, Wichita, Ks.
I have recently made a new friend. He is a 25 year old sailor from Poland. He has been sailing for most of his life and sounds to be very experienced for his age. He and I have talked a fair amount about the differences in sailing in our areas.
One of the differences we have discussed is the requirement for training and certification in sailing. In his area, and I believe much of Europe, you need to be certified for both inshore sailing and offshore sailing. I probably don’t have the exact details correct but the inshore sailing certification would let you sail in the lakes, canals and within 5 miles of land. He has been working teaching sailing and is trying to become certified as an inshore instructor. He also is becoming certified for offshore and has been doing some crewing on offshore passages to gain experience.
Another key difference we have been discussing is the quality of boats where he sails. Poland is one of the larger centers for boat building and many large boat builders like Jeanneau and Sea Ray build boats in Poland. However, the vast majority of these boats are shipped elsewhere. Most boats in use in this area are 30 or more years old. It is very common to still have wooden boats. Several of his offshore passages have been on wooden boats where they are repairing leaks and constantly bailing water throughout the passage.

I met him about three weeks ago when he showed up at the marina and started working on a 36 foot Derbeck center cockpit, cutter/ketch. It’s a really stout looking boat that I have had my eye on for some time and was considering asking the marina about the status of the boat just before I saw him working on it. The boat has been sitting on the hard for at least 4 – 6 years. None of us at the marina can remember the last time it was in the water. The boat looked like it had good bones but needed a lot of TLC to get it back to passage making shape.

After getting to take a closer look, there is a brand new Yanmar diesel (less than 50 hours), an electrical system that was entirely rewired probably 10 years ago with all red wires (you can’t tell what is the positive or negative wires without tracing it back), original brass seacocks throughout the boat (almost all of which are frozen open), practically brand new sails (all 4 of them from Doyle and still crisp) and 10 or more years old electronics (2 loran systems, SSB & VHF radios with dials not digital displays, an old Garmin GPS and a Raytheon radar). The plumbing system seems to have been redone at some point but I saw a lot of “dead ends” which are breeding grounds for bacteria. The water pressure pump is broken (not winterized properly); there is a hand pump at the galley sink but none onboard knew what it was for until I showed them. The cabin top was designed to be slightly concaved and there are drain plugs that would allow collected rain water to go directly into both of the 50 gallon water tanks (one on each side). All of the running rigging is at least 15 years old and it has been sitting out uncovered for the 4-6 years the boat was on the hard. All of the halyards are rope to wire splices (most of them don’t look good to me). Based on soundings of the hull there does not appear to be any delamination (solid glass hull, no core) but there is delamination on the rudder. There used to be solar panels but they were stolen last summer. Now mind you, this is my list after only spending about 2 hours on the boat.

So the 25 year old Polish sailor, Mike, met the owner, Chris, in Poland; the owner is a certified offshore sailor. Chris bought the boat for $12,000 last year based on photos and had never seen the boat or had it surveyed. I don’t know the details of the agreement but I suspect that Mike is working for free but Chris is covering the cost of any supplies and Mike’s living expenses while working on the boat. Mike flew in from Poland 3 weeks ago to begin getting this boat ready to go in the water. He has cleaned the boat, inspected some of the system (I don’t believe he is very experienced on the maintenance side of boats), replaced batteries, installed a Humming Bird Fish Finder/GPS Unit, epoxied a 5” whole from an old transducer that was installed in a wooden block that was rotten, painted the bottom and put epoxy on the outside of the rudder but didn’t pull it apart and deal with the delamination. Chris flew out on Thursday of last week to begin helping. Chris also somehow found an American from Florida who is also helping and along for the ride but he has never been on a boat before so he offers nothing but another set of hands.

Here are the things I know that were never addressed before the boat went in the water: the engine was never run, the electrical system was never fully inspected or tested (they installed the Humming Bird unit, tried it and saw that it was not working correctly and they had cabin lights), none of the existing electronics were working, the water tanks were never flushed or inspected, the blackwater system was never tested or inspected, and all of the running and standing rigging was never inspected or changed.

The boat launched yesterday at 9AM. Their original plan was to sail out at 9PM last night on the outgoing tide to head for Nova Scotia (New Scotland as they call it). From there on to either Galloway or Portugal depending on the wind. They estimate it would take 2 weeks to complete this trip.

I went down to the boat last night to see them off at 7 PM. At that time, they still hadn’t started the engine, checked out the electrical system or any of the plumbing. They had purchased about $300 of provisions from the Stop N Shop across the street and Chris and the guy from Florida were at the dollar store getting can openers, forks, plates, etc. Oh, and they had refilled the propane tanks for the stove but had not tested the stove yet. They had a camping propane stove for a backup.

I went on the boat because Mike could not find the shore power connection and wanted to charge the batteries. I found that the AC side of the electrical had been disconnected from any connection for shore power (the bare wires were in one of the cabinets). They also had water pouring in through the strainer that was not connected to the engine. The bilge pump was off and the bilge was almost filled with water. I tried to close the seacock and it was frozen. We connected the hose to the water pump and found out that the top of the strainer could not be all the way secured due to a broken bolt. We were able to get it to hold but the bolt needed to be replaced to really fix it.

Since we had the water connected, they wanted to start the engine. I guess they tried to bet a mechanic to come and look at the engine. However, they didn’t look for someone until Sunday and were surprised they didn’t get anyone to call them back. We looked at the electrical set up and it seemed strange because it had one battery switch that was the typical “1-2-All-Off” switch. The other was “1-Accessory(from a label maker)-Off”. The “1” was connected to the starter and the “Accessory” was connected to the windless. The typical switch was connected to the house bank of 3 batteries in parallel (“2”) and a new group 27 deep cycle starter battery (“1”) they installed new that morning. We changed both switches to 1 and we heard popping and sizzling then smelled smoke. The terminals on the starter battery had literally melted off. (See Photos) My guess is someone crossed a positive line with a negative, which would be easy to do since they were all red with no way to tell them apart easily.

After all this, Chris was still considering leaving port on the morning outgoing tide. He thought he could sail out to open ocean (did I mention that the only charts they had were 15+ year old paper charts of the Boston area and nothing for either of their Europe landing points) and just set course for Europe. (At this point Mike did start looking at his exit strategy.) They did final decide to try and get someone to look at the electrical system and engine and delay leaving for a little bit to get that worked out. But I wouldn’t be surprised if I go down there tonight and they are gone.

So to my original premise in the title, are American sailors more over cautious then European sailors? It took all of these events for these two, experienced European sailors to finally delay their departure. I would have backed out at so many different points in the last 2-3 weeks. To be honest, if I showed up and saw the condition of the boat and knew the time frame I would have just left.

The items/defects I listed above that I noticed on their boat are items on my prelaunch check list to be done every year. So to launch a boat without checking these seems a bit crazy to me as well.

Also, to contemplate the journey with no “shake down” seems insane to me. We do 3-4 “shake down” sails at the beginning of each season before we would even consider doing even a 40 kn cruise that only takes us 5-10 km offshore.

This still doesn’t even address the list of spare parts and emergency equipment I keep. They had one set (4) current flares, a used and untested emergency raft, no harnesses or jack lines and had returned their sat phone for an In Reach because they couldn’t figure out the sat phone. They had some spares but no inventory to know what they had and no plans to get other spares.

While I think this maybe way over the top unsafe, it does make me think that maybe I am too cautious. Maybe there is a better balance to be reach and not being so paranoid that everything could go wrong.

So what do you guys think?
Patrick here in Wichita, your question is interesting, but I don't have an answer. I can tell you I was lucky enough to spend a month in Hingham, at a motel called Hugo's by the Sea or something like that.....what a beautiful
harbor and village w/ horse and carriage so prevalent....met a decendent of one of the Salem witches...in the bar....spent many evenings speaking with her...it was sad when I left....good food and great fun too in the restaurant of the same name on the opposite side of the harbor...Patrick in Wichita....
 
Nov 18, 2010
2,441
Catalina 310 Hingham, MA
Well, JK, you asked a general question and then supported your view with a very lengthy, minutely detailed essay. So.... just by examing your post it is very clear that you are an extremely, overly cautious sailor...... but you have failed to convince me that it is a Europe vs. American phenomenon. It is You vs. the one european sailor that you do know..

This is not meant to be critical of you in any way...... it's just a comment on the similarity between your own acceptable level of sailing precaution and the way you communicate it to others. If my explanation makes no sense.... I completely understand the confusion and you have my permission to label me and my comments as totally "irrelevant".

The essence of your premise is understandable to me in this respect..... I feel that europeans, and australians, in general are more "ADVENTUROUS" than the typical american sailor......... but I can't really back it up with hard evidence...... it's just my gut feeling.... perhaps you could steer the conversation in that direction.... rather than one group being more cautious than the other.... what do you think?
Joe, thanks for the more detailed explanation.

Interesting that you feel I am an "extremely, overly cautious sailor". It's difficult judging your own level of risk tolerance in relative terms. To be honest, I thought I was similar to other sailors but perhaps I need to reexamine if I am being overly cautious. I wonder if reading all of the posts on forums like this has somehow shocked me into being overly cautious. What's funny is a large portion of my job is helping my clients define their acceptable level of risk tolerance. How can I work my way into being a more adventurous sailor? Oh well, topic for a future post maybe.

Back to the main topic, I guess I am similar to you in that my "gut" tells me that Americans seem to be less adventurous then Europeans. And definitely less adventurous than Australians. I relayed my on anecdote on the subject but have not real hard facts.

I don’t know, you have definitely given me a lot to think about.
 
Jun 2, 2004
1,077
Several Catalinas C25/C320 USA
Re: Are American Sailor More Over Cautious Then European Sai

25....he's a kid, I don't care what his experience level is...at 25 it can't be much.
 

Kordie

.
Aug 7, 2011
144
Beneteau 393 Cruising Baja
Big Windy said:
25....he's a kid, I don't care what his experience level is...at 25 it can't be much.
There's an 18 year old girl here who has single handed a non stop circumnavigation and skippered a boat in the Sydney to Hobart amongst other achievements.

Age is not always a reflection of experience.
 
Mar 1, 2012
2,182
1961 Rhodes Meridian 25 Texas coast
25....he's a kid, I don't care what his experience level is...at 25 it can't be much.
Spent an afternoon aboard a LARGE tug last fall, when stopped by a broken lock on the ICW. The number one skipper on the boat was 24. He was THE guy the others looked to. Age is NOT the criteria.

And you want to talk adventuresome? Talk to some South Africans sailing out of CapeTown, or some New Zealanders sailing in the Tasman Sea!! Comparatively, Americans are weinies!!:D
 

Joe

.
Jun 1, 2004
8,175
Catalina 27 Mission Bay, San Diego
Joe, thanks for the more detailed explanation.

Interesting that you feel I am an "extremely, overly cautious sailor".
You know, I used the "overly cautious" term because that was in your original post........ but, "overly" seems to give "caution" a negative connotation. Being extra, or extremely, cautious is seems more postive.

So..... let me change my statement to: "you are are an extremely cautious sailor." and that's a good thing.

And to add to my list of adventurous nationalities.... New Zealanders, South Africans and.... Japanese.... but to me the British lead the pack.
 
Mar 2, 2011
489
Compac 14 Charleston, SC
When I look back at the things I did while sailing before I was 25....I'm amazed that I lived to tell the tale. Now that I'm twice that age, my level of caution has grown but not enough to exceed my sense of adventure.

Until I figured out that I didn't know, what I didn't know...I was almost as foolish.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.