A 6-inch-deep mud puddle, preferably one that turns her white fur black/brown, has been her go-to desire.
A 6-inch-deep mud puddle, preferably one that turns her white fur black/brown, has been her go-to desire.
Somehow, ""a dislike for deep water" does not seem out of place for a dog bred for farm and ranch work. lolI suspect the line will be strong enough. You need a solid clip to attach it to the dog's harness. The Kong Clip may be over engineered for this purpose. I'd use one of the new-styled body harnesses.
Our Aussie has not yet been on the boat. She is only 37 lbs but filled with energy and a dislike for deep water. A 6-inch-deep mud puddle, preferably one that turns her white fur black/brown, has been her go-to desire.
View attachment 228779
Bing bing bing! We have a winner. I still have one of those in my garage (part of what my wife calls my “hardware store” ). I bought it in the 1980’s as a tether line (maybe even late 70’s) from Defender (when it was in New Rochelle NY). The harness I bought at the same time was equally crude, with unpolished stamped buckles.It is a really bad idea that was once employed as a tether for a harness. The bad idea was there was no way to easily release the tether from the harness if you were being dragged along side the boat. Also, the carabiner could snag on the pad eye and inadvertently open rendering the tether useless.
Modern tethers have a quick release shackle at the harness end and a double action clip at the pad eye/jack line end.
I used to have one, never used it.
Ours is not liking water either. We took her to a city park pool party for dogs this past summer - she ran around the perimeter playing with the other dogs but it was a 'no-go' getting her into the pool. It's hilarious seeing about 100 dogs running, splashing, and playing in 2 adjacent pools.I suspect the line will be strong enough. You need a solid clip to attach it to the dog's harness. The Kong Clip may be over engineered for this purpose. I'd use one of the new-styled body harnesses.
Our Aussie has not yet been on the boat. She is only 37 lbs but filled with energy and a dislike for deep water. A 6-inch-deep mud puddle, preferably one that turns her white fur black/brown, has been her go-to desire.
View attachment 228779
Chest harnesses of any type (used alone) have not been approved for recreational or industrial work at height for about 50 years. The change to seat harnesses was on the 70s. At the same time, shock absorption was introduced into tethers (I believe that was the invention of Simon Yates).I worked on a tall ship that had the worst harnesses I have ever seen. In fact, they were not harnesses, they were just the tether similar the one pictured in the original post, a 3-strand rope with an eye splice with the end passed through the eye splice to form a loop and a clip at the end. We were expected to wear these with the loop around our bodies any time we went into the rig. None of us ever clipped them in. Beyond the obvious hazard of having a slip knot cinch up around your waist, using any harness was not viewed as improving safety aloft. The most likely time to fall would be when climbing or descending the ratlins and you obviously can't continuously clip and unclip while doing this. While working on the yard a proper harness might help in some cases but dangling from a rope didn't appeal to anyone. The backline was a very good second line of defense while on the yard.
When the captain explained the use of the "harness" he said the insurance company required anyone going aloft to wear a harness. He knew no one used them anyway.