I don't have a spring in my rigid vang, but I do have an in-mast furler. Am I inducing wear by not using the topping lift? I thought the spring was mostly used for inducing belly in light wind. Also, isn't it part of the point of having a rigid vang, in order to do away with the topping lift? (I feel like I'm in the "valley of despair" on the Dunning-Kruger curve)
The purpose of a vang, rigid or otherwise is to keep the boom from lifting, especially down wind. The spring keeps the vang in a neutral position and is generally strong enough to support the weight of the boom and sail. If you have rigid vang and release the tension on it the boom can bounce, try it. A secondary benefit is the rigid vang will support the boom when the sail is being raised, lowered, or reefed. Without a topping lift or rigid vang as soon as halyard tension is released the boom will drop as far as the gooseneck will allow it, often with unpleasant consequences for the heads of anyone in the cockpit.
Using the halyard as a topping lift reduces the amount of bounce in the boom and allows the boom to be raised higher to provide more headroom in the cockpit.
There are other ways to increase draft in the mainsail, reduced halyard tension and reduced outhaul tension will increase draft. However my knowledge about furling mains is rather limited, there may be furling issues with reduced tension on the halyard and outhaul.
If there is no spring in the rigid vang, how is it rigged to extend and release? The vang control typically pulls the upper section down towards the lower section against the spring, releasing the control allows the spring to push the upper section up allowing the boom to rise. The spring may not be visible as it may be contained within the tubing.