Indeed! However, neither of us was actually talking about an omniscient being as a part of our discussion. I think, however, he might have thought I was. I don't understand why one is exclusive of the other. Understanding a scientific explanation behind a particular phenomenon doesn't say one way or another about the existence of a "Creator".Randomness is certainly a more promising theory than an omniscient being.
Discussing the origins and nature of an apparent spontaneous creation of matter from nothing certainly has its implications around that, especially since the whole concept seems paradoxical to what we believe about science. That may be a good reason to avoid discussing the subject and declaring it settled.
-Will (Dragonfly)