Your right John, but....
....If you compare the amount of copper in the ablative paints to the non ablative, you will see substantially less. This is due to the fact that the primary de-fouling technique is the actual wearing away of the paint. I would think, although I don't know positively, that the overall effect is that less copper leaches into the water then those paints with a heavy copper content. A call to Interlux or Pettit should be able to answer the question fully. Additionally, not having to sand the bottom greatly reduces the amount of copper dust in the air/water, not to mention the lungs. The new water based ablatives are even more environmentially friendly, and I am told by an Interlux rep., they are very effective.How far racers go to pick up an extra 10th of a knot is amusing to me, being a non-racer. It is also understandable. If you race your boat you tend to get caught up in all sorts of rediculous things to gain the slightest advantage. I guess it's a matter of philosophy (sorry). At any rate the ablatives are quite a bit softer, however, I have found that, amoung ablatives, the West Marine CPP is harder then the Micron - and cheaper, even though it's made by the same company - Interlux.Three years ago I moved my boat to the Chesapeake for a couple of seasons. Before the move I decided to paint the bottom with one coat of Blue CPP under two coats of Black CPP knowing that I was going to be doing quite a bit of cruising between the Chesapeake and Block island. Aside from a minor touch up last year at the leading edges and water line, this will be the first bottom painting in three years. I will simply scrub the bottom with a stiff brush and water, allow to dry, feather in any bald spots, then repaint. Hopefully I will not have to repaint for at least two years.Pat