Simply not true, unless you have different data to present. Yes, propylene glycol (PG) is less toxic to mamals than ethylene glycol (EG) and thus PG MUST be used in all potable systems. However, the toxicity of EG and PG to marine organisms is low and equivalent.
http://www.riskworld.com/Abstract/1996/sraeurop/ab6ad040.htm
As comfirmation, please read the MSDS statements regarding marine toxicity of each product--chose the brand of your choise and look them up. Additionally, about 1/3 less EG is required than PG, making the EG less toxic and contributing less COD.
PG
Ecotoxicity: Water flea Daphnia: EC50 > 10000 mg/L; 48 Hr; Unspecified</B>Bacteria: Phytobacterium phosphoreum: EC50 = 710 mg/L; 30 min; Microtox test</B>Fish: Goldfish: LC50 > 5000 mg/L; 24 Hr; Unspecified</B>Fish: Guppy: LC50 > 1000 mg/L; 48 Hr; Unspecified</B> If released to water, 1,2-propanediol is expected to degrade relatively rapidly via biodegradation. If released to soil, relatively rapid biodegradation should also occur. Significant leaching in soil can be predicted.
EG
Ecotoxicity: Goldfish LD50= >5000mg/L/24Hr Guppies LC50= 493,000ppm/7D Shrimp (salt water) LC50= >100ppm/48Hr
Certain gasket and hose materials--neoprene--do not care for PG but do well with EG.
http://www.coleparmer.com/Chemical-Resistance
For example, zinc is lethal to fish but people take zinc pills. Dog should avoid chocholate. Toxicity is not so simple.
I'm just trying to be acurate in my postings by looking up the information first.
___________
No, as others have posted, it's not worth doing over.