Now you know why old geezers like myself take pictures before we dismantle anything. I asked my Doc to do that once, he said it’s only going to look like a long dark tunnel.Thanks All. The first pic from PaulJ gave me what I needed. I like how he has a single line and how it is routed. Not sure now why mine had two pieces of line.
AllUGet you are absolutely right. My mistake was looking at it and thinking "that is simple, hold my beer."Now you know why old geezers like myself take pictures before we dismantle anything. I asked my Doc to do that once, he said it’s only going to look like a long dark tunnel.
My vang has two lines, one heavier than the other. I assume this is the factory setup.Thanks All. The first pic from PaulJ gave me what I needed. I like how he has a single line and how it is routed. Not sure now why mine had two pieces of line.
There is a heavier line that runs the to blocks on both ends of the piston. The aft and upper end of the line is made to double block. That double block has smaller line that goes to the swivel on the mast. It gets turned and directed thru a flat x3 block and runs to the cockpit.My vang has two lines, one heavier than the other. I assume this is the factory setup.
Are you sure you don’t have a “cascaded” vang as that would explain the two lines. If the original setup was and you don’t put it back you will have to exert a lot more force to accomplish the setting you want.Not sure now why mine had two pieces of line.
Not on our C310. Just one line. Maybe CY used different vangs over the years?My vang has two lines, one heavier than the other. I assume this is the factory setup.
Very likely that CY changed the vang setup. Mine is a 2003. The smaller control line runs through multiple blocks and makes it easier to adjust the vang, as mentioned in a previous post.Not on our C310. Just one line. Maybe CY used different vangs over the years?