My keel is damaged. Wings are turned up and separated from hull. I need a new one. Can anyone please point me in the right direction? Need a rudder also.
If the insurance company does 'total' the boat, it will most likely not be insurable thereafter. The insurance companies share these 'totaled boat' records to minimize fraud. If they write it off, so should you.My guess is they'll total boat, so I will have to do all this.
I think I will simply cut the wings off and rock on if everything else is ok... and replace the rudder.If the damage is only to those little winglets on the keel, I'd be inclined to take them right off. I doubt they had much to the boat's performance and the weight difference wouldn't be that much. This is assuming the rest of the boat has no significant damage.
A few years ago I contacted Mars Metals about changing a 6' draft keel to one of their shorter bulb keels. The cost was close to $10K about 10 years ago and that did not include transporting the boat to Toronto.
Insurance companies "follow the money" so to speak. Your preferences don't factor into the decision much. I once had an 1984 Mercedes station wagon that suffered some very minor front end damage. The car was totaled because when they ran the "calcs" on the cost of repair it turns out the car parts on that particular car were worth so much and the parts I needed would cost an astonomical amount so they totaled the car. Just a $$$ decision for them.
I think Capta may have hit on the biggest point. IF it is totaled, before you make any decision to buy the totaled boat back and spend big bucks for repair make absolutely sure you can insure the boat afterwords. If you can't, take the money and run! Even if you can the resale value of the previously totaled boat will be discounted significantly. If you don't disclose that it has been totaled at the time of sale, you may be subject to legal action from the buyer (I'm not a lawyer but I slept in a Holiday Inn last night) One of you lawyer types can chime in on that. Remember, Capta was a boat broker (or dealer, I'm not sure which) in the past and he knows of what he writes.
I’d be a little leery about sailing without the winglets. Not sure how much they weigh but being at the very bottom of the keel they must contribute greatly to your stability. The winglets I’m told also reduce the pitching motion as well. My 466 has the 6’6” fin keel and it is a bit tender. Not sure I would whack em off and rock on. My 2cents.If the damage is only to those little winglets on the keel, I'd be inclined to take them right off. I doubt they had much to the boat's performance and the weight difference wouldn't be that much. This is assuming the rest of the boat has no significant damage.
A few years ago I contacted Mars Metals about changing a 6' draft keel to one of their shorter bulb keels. The cost was close to $10K about 10 years ago and that did not include transporting the boat to Toronto.
Just checked the rudder price for the 460. It alone is $5041.I’d be a little leery about sailing without the winglets. Not sure how much they weigh but being at the very bottom of the keel they must contribute greatly to your stability. The winglets I’m told also reduce the pitching motion as well. My 466 has the 6’6” fin keel and it is a bit tender. Not sure I would whack em off and rock on. My 2cents.
The 466 bulb-wing keel has 9,500 lbs of lead ballast. The winglets look fairly small, even if they weigh a couple hundred pounds it would only reduce the ballast by about 2%. Would that make a difference? Yes. Would it be a difference that was noticeable? I'm not so certain.I’d be a little leery about sailing without the winglets. Not sure how much they weigh but being at the very bottom of the keel they must contribute greatly to your stability. The winglets I’m told also reduce the pitching motion as well. My 466 has the 6’6” fin keel and it is a bit tender. Not sure I would whack em off and rock on. My 2cents.
The 466 deep fin is 9500. The shoal draft is 9680. 6’6” versus 5’6”. I just know mine is a bit tender and shallower lighter will not improve things.The 466 bulb-wing keel has 9,500 lbs of lead ballast. The winglets look fairly small, even if they weigh a couple hundred pounds it would only reduce the ballast by about 2%. Would that make a difference? Yes. Would it be a difference that was noticeable? I'm not so certain.