Thanks. Good info.timebandit said:This may be of some help---
http://www.qbcbearings.com/BuyRFQ/ThrustB_Bearing_TPS_I.htm
Thanks. Good info.timebandit said:This may be of some help---
http://www.qbcbearings.com/BuyRFQ/ThrustB_Bearing_TPS_I.htm
Checked for the 1/2 inch, out of stock. Waiting on a email from them.r.oril said:Thanks. Good info.
This may be of some help---
http://www.qbcbearings.com/BuyRFQ/ThrustB_Bearing_TPS_I.htm
The spreader does not move. Hold your arms out, turn your body but don't move the position of your arms. The stays are relocated to the front center of the hound on a D ring. The mast moves freely and the stays don't move.finding41 said:Time bandit you are a genius. Thanks for the link. That looks after the bottom of the mast.
Now how do the stays rotate? Does the rigging get tighter? Shouldn't?
I ordered the Thrust Bearings yesterday. $11 for the sets. ($10 minimum order). My boat is a trailer queen so I will cover the foot of the mast with a bag when not in use to prevent problems.r.oril said:The spreader does not move. Hold your arms out, turn your body but don't move the position of your arms. The stays are relocated to the front center of the hound on a D ring. The mast moves freely and the stays don't move.
Bob are you saying that you only have 20 and 17 lbs. of tension in the shrouds? If so is that all that the M's run for tension. We have like 300 if I remember right... The 20 top and 17 lower seems to work good for now and I will crank them down a little at a time if I see to much slack on the lee side.
The forestay/furler is attached to the top hound with a D ring at the center ......
Good question...I will ask Mike... I am not a racer. Thinking that the stock sail will more efficient with the mast rotating.Bob, was there any advice about the sail - can you use your original classic sail if you were to continue using your classic mast but with the rotation? I think the rotating mast sails are cut a little different but wonder how much this matters? Im wondering this since my main is fairly new but is designed for a fixed mast.
There is such a thing as Running Backstays that can be used or substituted for regular backstay.However, one thing to consider. The M doesnt have a back stay but it also uses a much beefier mast. I think the classic mast is something like 3.5 inch front to back, the M mast is about 5 inches front to back.
For the record, only the older 26M's have the 3 X 5.25 teardrop mast, the newer models have 3 X 4 inch teardrop masts. Something to do with the extrusion process motivated the mast supplier to change the specs. The 3X4 mast they supply now is designed to fit all models, just cut to length.
The larger mast is probably better for the benifits of rotation but it also may be what allows no backstay to be used? I think the M also moved the stays back a little to also not need the back stay.
The swept back spreaders for upper shrouds also add to the equation.
I think M owners have put on back stays with some sort of rotation at the top of the mast... The back stay may still be important with the smaller mast used on the D and S???
I guess that you will have to see one in action.finding41 said:Mast shroud tension?
I cant get how we don't see complaints form the M owners about there masts flopping all over. I mean look at the manual. pg 6,8,9. There is got to be a 7/16 gap between the bottom plate of the mast and the top of the rotating base plate. How would the force of the wind affect the mast moving when tacking? It must make the shrouds on one side loose then tighten.