Hi,
I have a Hunter 49 (2008) , I'm a cruiser live on board. I am now embarking on my third mainsail.
I'm beginning to develop the view that in mast furling is cause my sails life to be generally shorter than other cruisers, though most of the feedback to date has been from conventional slab reefing.
So Im primarily interested in those who have in mast furling and whom sail more often than motor and not so much weekend sailors, who's sails dont see the sun or the wind most of there life.
I do ( excluding covid years) a lot of sailing on average 5000, to 8000nm per year.
I got 5 years out of the original production sail, and 7 years ( less 1 year covid
out of the current sail.
It seems in chatting over a beer many cruisers are getting at least twice that out of there sails.
The manufactures of the sails are telling me around 4000 hours max in the tropics (I'm in Philippines) , mostly sailing the pacific and Asia. So 4000hrs over say 6 years, so this means I have at max 2 hrs/day or 500 8hr days. Im certainly getting that, but what about you guys. How do these numbers stack up.
I believe the sail is suffering UV failure, because I can pull it apart with my hand in some places where its not currently ripped with my hand. To me thats says UV damage.
Both mains seem to have suffered UV damage on the leech, or trailing edge. Im wondering, if this area is what is exposed through the slot when the sail is furled and therefore still suffering UV damage. Where as a conventional slab reef is probably covered more properly.
To that end I'm also wondering why I can not put a strip of sumbrella down the leech of my new main to act in a similar fashion to what we all have on our Jibs or Genoa's. Has anyone tried this, or know of a good reason, other than the bulk size why this has not been done before ?
All thoughts welcome
I have a Hunter 49 (2008) , I'm a cruiser live on board. I am now embarking on my third mainsail.
I'm beginning to develop the view that in mast furling is cause my sails life to be generally shorter than other cruisers, though most of the feedback to date has been from conventional slab reefing.
So Im primarily interested in those who have in mast furling and whom sail more often than motor and not so much weekend sailors, who's sails dont see the sun or the wind most of there life.
I do ( excluding covid years) a lot of sailing on average 5000, to 8000nm per year.
I got 5 years out of the original production sail, and 7 years ( less 1 year covid
It seems in chatting over a beer many cruisers are getting at least twice that out of there sails.
The manufactures of the sails are telling me around 4000 hours max in the tropics (I'm in Philippines) , mostly sailing the pacific and Asia. So 4000hrs over say 6 years, so this means I have at max 2 hrs/day or 500 8hr days. Im certainly getting that, but what about you guys. How do these numbers stack up.
I believe the sail is suffering UV failure, because I can pull it apart with my hand in some places where its not currently ripped with my hand. To me thats says UV damage.
Both mains seem to have suffered UV damage on the leech, or trailing edge. Im wondering, if this area is what is exposed through the slot when the sail is furled and therefore still suffering UV damage. Where as a conventional slab reef is probably covered more properly.
To that end I'm also wondering why I can not put a strip of sumbrella down the leech of my new main to act in a similar fashion to what we all have on our Jibs or Genoa's. Has anyone tried this, or know of a good reason, other than the bulk size why this has not been done before ?
All thoughts welcome