I gotta admit, that was an eye-opener of an article. I really should spend more time reading those technical briefs, because I myself have long said and thought the same thing. It rarely bothers me much being wrong on an opinion, because after awhile you start to get used to being wrong.

Besides the utter arrogance and ego's that will not let some personalities do this, bone-headedness dictates well here, (me), too..
But as others have also done, and true it emphatically does say on some poly products not to do this, maybe the poly research being the almost ancient technology it is, testing is less common. West seems to have covered this well. Even on the yard we rarely use poly's except on large deck pours, ie: removing the teak off of the decks of these poorly built oriental boats, because of the adhesion 'myths'. (20 gallon mixes can get prohibitively expensive quick). Our number one body man almost refuses to use poly for this reason, myself included, for the uncertainty of not knowing if there has been epoxy used there before, and failures are really not part of our long term strategy for repairs. Flat unacceptable would be a closer mentality.
I guess that is why I just asked about how the gelcoat went over the epoxy as opposed to simply stating that it would not work..
Myths die hard, huh?
Good info.