As a ditch item I think GPS and DSC would be a great thing to have in a handheld VHF. The coast guard towers can pick up a handheld VHF signal from a fairly long distance. Take a look at the story posted here earlier today :
http://www.acrartex.com/survivors/stories/2011/foster-stanback/
Here a handheld was heard from near Catalina all the way to San Diego and was instrumental in a successful rescue. If the guys in the water didn't also have a PLB the handheld and GPS could have been the difference between life and death.
If you don't want or need that capability don't buy it. But a handheld with GPS and DSC certainly has it's place.
Well, I surely can't argue with a marketing story. Maybe the PLB had more to do with the rescue than a VHF that only worked for one call.
I will not argue that VHF cannot be heard over great distances. I will argue that VHF can be heard over great distance reliably. In this case (the story) my argument will be proven. However, the specs on the ACR are:
5W (406 MHz), 50 mW +/-3dB (121.5 MHz)
Note the frequencies and not the power. 406 MHz, high VHF frequency in Government and low UHF in all others, is a satellite receive frequency and 121.5 MHz is an aircraft, low VHF, frequency. These are monitored by just about every agency in the US and international. So no doubt they had a great deal to do with the rescue, not the handheld radio that did not work.
Not trying to burst any bubble, but see that PLB or EPIRB will be more effective than just a handheld with GPS and DSC alone.
Now, if one desires to purchase these tools then I would encourage one to do so. However, think about what you are getting and do research.
Thanks for posting that article link. It was a good read and I am very happy the guys made it back safely.