Capta: If you were going to say it is made of fish oil.... that would be incorrect. But to be fair I have heard that same story. If you go to the link I posted earlier in this thread, they have a page of common myths and this was on there. They did say that they believe the myth got started because it seems to attract fish.Hint; WD-40 is illegal in Alaska as a fish attractant on your lures for a very good reason. Wanna guess why?
and I found it pleasant enough. Can't say that I has ever tempted to taste it however. Off hand I don't buy the "fishing lure" story.
I do not know what it's made with, but I do know it works and it IS illegal to put on fishing lures in Alaska.Capta: If you were going to say it is made of fish oil.... that would be incorrect. But to be fair I have heard that same story. If you go to the link I posted earlier in this thread, they have a page of common myths and this was on there. They did say that they believe the myth got started because it seems to attract fish.
You and others misunderstand that the testing does not compare labs results to what you may or may not find for you own application as one poster fretted about.Any study that uses meaningless and perhaps misleading phrases like "scientifically rusted" without explaining the actual process and providing a percentage for the margin of error among the samples looses credibility....
man you are good ...from the looks of that back yard you did a good job of shoveling the snow away so you could work on that ford tractorI can see where this is heading so I'll offer up the opportunity to test the different products. I took off the rear wheels with PB Blaster, impact wrench, heat, and a 1" drive breaker bar with 8 foot pipe. I however need to have a front tire removed for repair and being 50 years since it was put on, it may be difficult.
So if you would like to come and try your stuff I'll supply the lemonade. You just have to extinguish any fires you start around the machine if you choose to wait until the snow goes away. I can't remember if there's six or eight lugs on the front and its below zero with the wind blowing so I'm not going out to check.
Maybe you could get Maine Sail to video it, we could have it posted. I don't have a torque wrench that big so we'll have to guestimate pounds of force. Bring a note from your Doctor just in case we get to straining on a nut.
Too late, my wife read this post over my shoulder since I was asking her to spell the big words. She says she not having a bunch of sailors in her yard arguing about how to tie knots or what kind of oil filters to use. This is her time off and get my tools and do my own work, blah, blah. I'll let you know if I get around to changing the tire. (That was a good idea)
All U Get
I can see where this is heading ... (That was a good idea) All U Get
Here is one-I can see where this is heading so I'll offer up the opportunity to test the different products. I took off the rear wheels with PB Blaster, impact wrench, heat, and a 1" drive breaker bar with 8 foot pipe. I however need to have a front tire removed for repair and being 50 years since it was put on, it may be difficult.
i have heard of this beforeHers is one-
Heat up the lugs/studs- really hot. Press candle wax or (canning) paraffin onto the studs thus to melt same. Magic happens according to some? Tell us if magic happens for you.
Charles
Equal doesn't mean they are rusted/corroded in place. It seems they are just measuring which is a better thread lubricant, not which one loosens rusted/corroded hardware.You and others misunderstand that the testing does not compare labs results to what you may or may not find for you own application as one poster fretted about.
The point is that whatever the testing process, is that ALL the screws/bolts or nuts were all treat EQUALLY as to simulated wear conditions/patterns BEOFRE the extraction readings were taken. This assures a common and equal STARTING ground- which is the basis for ANY test of ANY material using ANY medium for whatever you're trying to do. In this test, they are all EQUAL up to the point of putting the wrench on the bolt- regardless of how they are equal.
Well, Duh, it can't be a lubricant it it can't get to the frozen threads... and that's the stated purpose of the post.... It seems they are just measuring which is a better thread lubricant, not which one loosens rusted/corroded hardware.
My suggestion is that they aren't really rusted/corroded, and that due to the way they are testing it is just rating the lubricating rather then penetrating qualities. And as anyone who has actually attempted to remove old salt water frozen hardware knows, it's all about the penetration.Well, Duh, it can't be a lubricant it it can't get to the frozen threads... and that's the stated purpose of the post.