Would you be willing to stand by that comment, beyond a single installation on a C-30, and apply it for all boats such as the OP's...?
The Evolution heading sensors are a definitely a major, major improvement but the AP still performs better when it actually knows where the rudder is. Heck it took Raymarine many years to get the X series to even work marginally well without an RR and that was after holding back the launch date for a very long time. Even when the X series finally launched it still failed to perform well without a RR, despite them actively marketing & suggesting that it did not need one. While the EV's do considerably better than the X series the RR really completes the package in terms of overall performance. Course any AP needs to be properly installed, properly calibrated & set up and they rarely are.
Hard over time being accurate helps, as does a good set up (the EV is much easier in this regard), but does not help much when it gets sloppy and the WP belt starts slipping. On some boats, such as outboard motor fishing boats, I can't install an RR but the hydraulic pumps don't stall or slip and with careful set up they can be made to perform okay but not as well as they could with an RR. A RR definitely helps at low speeds too. When going slow in calm water the rate gyro and digital compass are trying their hardest to steer the boat accurately but without RR data over corrections can be made due to the slow response reactions sensed by the rate sensor & digital compass. An RR can very often help with slow speed performance. Many boats upgrading to an Evolution series already have a RR installed and the old RR's still work perfectly with a new EV series.
I would walk and have walked away from an AP installation when the owner chooses not to use a RR.