I've done some lithium battery testing but only on primary cells, not rechargeable. I can tell you things get interesting very fast when you abuse some of those batteries. The batteries I tested are Lithium-Thionyl chloride (Li-SOCl2), non-rechargeable, high energy density. One type was vented cells, the other was non-vented. The vented cells are not as bad but if you can get them over about 180°C they very quickly burn and exceed 800°C. The non-vented cells get a little more exciting. The 4 C-cell pack blew the door off the test chamber and the shock wave aggressively rattled the door to the room the test chamber was in during a partial short circuit test. This long duration over current (but under the fuse rating current) was introduced due to the Boeing 787 ELT fire which had a partial short circuit.
I only point this out to demonstrate the difference between these Li-SOCl2 cells and the much safer LiFePO4 rechargeable cells.
The US DOT conducted an investigation into hazards associated with plug in vehicle battery fires (DOT HS 812 418). A general conclusion was "The propensity and severity of fires and explosions from the accidental ignition of flammable electrolytic solvents used in Li-ion battery systems are anticipated to be somewhat comparable to or perhaps slightly less than those for gasoline or diesel vehicular fuels, with the overall consequences for Li-ion batteries also expected to be less because of the much lower amounts of flammable solvent released and burning." This is for rechargeable lithium batteries in general. This report also indicates for LiFePO4 batteries "For a significant improvement in safety in a positive electrode material, it has been suggested to move away from oxide materials to ones based on phosphates. Phosphate bonds are much stronger than those in oxides, with the result that when abusively overcharged, LiFePO4 cells release very little energy. "
Lithium batteries got a bad wrap early on but are much safer now than they were originally. Lithium is flammable, lead is not, so there is a slight increase in the risk of fire however modern BMS and the use of phosphor makes this risk easily manageable. You would need to expose the batteries to greater than 180°C (255°F) to get them to burn and by then you probably have other things to worry about.
I only point this out to demonstrate the difference between these Li-SOCl2 cells and the much safer LiFePO4 rechargeable cells.
The US DOT conducted an investigation into hazards associated with plug in vehicle battery fires (DOT HS 812 418). A general conclusion was "The propensity and severity of fires and explosions from the accidental ignition of flammable electrolytic solvents used in Li-ion battery systems are anticipated to be somewhat comparable to or perhaps slightly less than those for gasoline or diesel vehicular fuels, with the overall consequences for Li-ion batteries also expected to be less because of the much lower amounts of flammable solvent released and burning." This is for rechargeable lithium batteries in general. This report also indicates for LiFePO4 batteries "For a significant improvement in safety in a positive electrode material, it has been suggested to move away from oxide materials to ones based on phosphates. Phosphate bonds are much stronger than those in oxides, with the result that when abusively overcharged, LiFePO4 cells release very little energy. "
Lithium batteries got a bad wrap early on but are much safer now than they were originally. Lithium is flammable, lead is not, so there is a slight increase in the risk of fire however modern BMS and the use of phosphor makes this risk easily manageable. You would need to expose the batteries to greater than 180°C (255°F) to get them to burn and by then you probably have other things to worry about.