You'll never get that thing to plane on asphalt. Regardless of the fuel. Or horsepower.
As in all things, compromise. Your shoulder is really going to hate lifting my 81 lb 9.8 horsepower OB onto the dink, and she simply cannot lift it. You don't do offshore, and you don't need a tug, so 5-6 hp is likely a great compromise.I thinks it's more typical than ironic, as I prefer to have as much horse power in my dink as possible at this age. The admiral agrees!
It's really not--it's a zero-sum game. Propane with 25% less energy (BTUs) than gasoline will require 25% more of it to do the same amount of work of [unleaded] gasoline of a fixed volume or weight. The amount of carbon dioxide emitted should be about the same but probably less carbon monoxide w/ propane. Fork lifts working in enclosed warehouse areas often use propane tanks (if not battery) b/c emissions are much less toxic to the people in there. Of course, then you have the canisters, as you say. But, what's the Eco-friendly part if CO2 is about the same?I don't understand how burning propane, a fossil fuel, and using disposable canisters, is more ECO friendly than a well tuned gas motor with a permanent fuel tank. How many of these little propane tanks end up in the landfill. There essentially is very little resources for recycling.
And, yes, I love to sail, but I love exploring the may coves and bays in the area we cruise. I also like to go for supplies if anchored out for an extended period and mostly it's a min. hour trip in the 15hp dink.
One of the two good things about Sumter, SC is we can get non-ethanol gasoline. The other is Simpson's Hardware. Come visit right after Thanksgiving and you'll see what I mean about Simpson's.I always thought that the big advantage to a propane fueled outboard was not having all the problems associated with the crap gasoline that we are forced to use.