You may want to have a engine survey done by a engine tech as most surveyor only look at it but not realy check it over ie compression, fuel filters, oil test etc. A oil test is only $60 and will tell you if you have any internal problem.
Exactly. I'm not sure what I'd learn. Either I've sailed the type before, or I can estimate the sailing characteristics based on the design. A little internet research will let you know of quirky sailing flaws probably better that you would be able to suss out in a 2 hour sail. Everything else (condition-wise) will show up during a shore inspection.I can't remember the last time I sea trialed a boat.
Normally, I would think that a price could not be "agreed upon" without the contingencies that go with it in place. So, it's not clear how you can make an offer and have agreed price, and then later ask whether or not purchase should be contingent on a [satisfactory] sea trial. It's sound like the deal is not really in place at this point, and if not--then wait until spring to buy the boat; it will most likely still be there.Hello;
I am in the midst of buying our first "big" sailboat. A 1973 Pearson 36. We are not going through a broker. The seller and I have agreed on price and I have secured the services of a marine surveyor. The boat is located in Wisconsin and it's early March so the boat is on the hard. My question is this; would you make any sale dependent on a satisfactory sea trial before having money change hands or would you rely solely on the results of a survey?
I can see your point, in particular on a 43 year old boat. Of the 10+ boats I've owned, only one of them was older than 10 years. All of them in very good shape. That might color my perspective.I believe the sea trial to be imperative in the inspection of all the mechanical aspects of the vessel. You can't find out what is wrong unless the vessel is underway and all the machinery is operated in normal use of the vessel. That includes the loads imparted on standing and running rigging. In two out of three purchases I have found more than one unsatisfactory item that was repaired or caused a renegotiation. It can only help to ensure you know what you are purchasing, warts and all.
Assuming you mean by shore "in the water," unless the buyer has the PO run the engine while on the hard. This would perhaps show an overheat condition, but since you can't run the engine in gear while out of the water without dissing the cutlass bearing, I'm not sure how this could help in a meaningful way. I consider the transmission an integral part of the boats basic systems, kinda like sails and rigging.Everything else (condition-wise) will show up during a shore inspection.
not to single anyone out, but a few replies to the OP has prompted this thought from me..I can't remember the last time I sea trialed a boat. After my own initial survey and one by another (insurance won't allow me to survey my own boat) I make the deal, I'll chance it. So far, so good.
I agree.... the OP needs to do his research to see if that particular model of boat fits his criteria before even thinking about a surveyor or sea trial.To the OP, try doing some more research. The answers are out there (even if they may not be right here).
Good luck.
I would imagine that given Richard's avitar he purchased the boat, "Pearson Pearson P36 sloop", whether or not he is happy with that purchase only Richard could tell us.Since @KennyG found this old thread, and there were so many great contributions, I'm sure we're all curious how this worked out. Did Richard Theyerl buy the old boat without a sea trial? Did it fall apart when put in the water? Did he just walk away ... and never sail again? This forum hasn't heard from him since Sept 2016, so perhaps it sunk?