If you read the full report there is a considerable amount of data. The tests were done in a controlled condition on land, so reflectivity could be accurately measured. In the other article, from Yachting Monthly, they compared on the water tests with the controlled condition tests. For most of the reflectors images from the radar screen are shown. All in all, the data is pretty compelling.Very interesting position taken by US Sailing on being "lulled into a false sense of security". I work with data for a living, so I'm usually pretty skeptical until I see what the data says. I own a Davis reflector, and I'm hoping to get a friend to turn on his radar for me and see what I look like with the reflector hoisted in various positions, from various bearings and ranges. I have modest expectations, but hope to get some repeatable results which will work for my boat. Like everyone else who owns a radar reflector, our hope is that it provides some greater level of reflectivity. I just want to KNOW what I'm getting, rather than hoping.
As a side note, the report was on the US Sailing website, I am not at all certain US Sailing has an official position on reflectors. CEC, ORC, and the USCG have standards which some reflectors meet.