Yes, similarly: cost, time, quality. You can pick 2 for most projects.When I read the title, my first thought was, "Affordable, Low Maintenance, Blue Water … Pick Two."
Sailing to Hawaii is easy, get to the trades and its all down hill. Sailing back is the hard part. You have to sail north to get over the Pacific high and then east to the coast.While sailing to Hawaii is relatively easy riding the winds and currents...
Here are a couple of solo sailors...
Here is a guy doing it a second time.
Found one!That simplifies things!.... find a good Cascade 36. End of discussion.
There is a good sreason they are known as "the affordable circumnavigator".
Robert Smith NA, designer. Hull is solid layup - roving. Fast and weatherly. Get lucky and maybe even find one with the tiller. We have at least 4 friends that have done extensive cruising in one. For less $, find a Cascade 29 -- same design and build pedigree.
The only time I have endured gale force conditions, we were delivering a Cascade 36 down the west coast. Surfing down 19 footers with only the vane driving, for 36 hours, at one memorable point.
Trivia: a friend of mine that has finally downsized from sailboats to a trawler in his retirement, still raves about the fun times decades ago with his young family on his Potter, and also the great social fun of the owners' group, the Potter Yotters...![]()
Especially this winter (at least in the Midwest)!Sailing to Hawaii is easy, get to the trades and its all down hill. Sailing back is the hard part. You have to sail north to get over the Pacific high and then east to the coast.
I prefer to sail to Hawaii at 35,000 feet.![]()
Go ahead Greg, rub it in.....Especially this winter (at least in the Midwest)!
Wife and I came out to Maui for a 3 week vacation and after hearing about the snow and cold weather back home, we extended for 2 more weeks...alas, I was working remote for the the 2-week extension... but up at 4:00am (8:00 back home) done working by noon or so and still had the afternoons on the beach!
Headed home this weekend though as I hear the snow is melting snd I still have some boat chores to get done before launching in April ;-)
View attachment 190761 View attachment 190763 View attachment 190764
At the “office”, watching another fantastic Maui sunset and the worlds best Mai Tai!
Anyone recognize the boat anchored off Cove Park ?
It all beats this...
View attachment 190765
Cheers,
Greg
I have done that trip on a cruise ship @ 21 kts (four days), and on a jet airliner outbound, and inside a KC-135 back to the states. Would love to make the trip on my boat, but am wondering if I have waited a decade too long. We shall see..... "The future is out there!"Sailing to Hawaii is easy, get to the trades and its all down hill. Sailing back is the hard part. You have to sail north to get over the Pacific high and then east to the coast.
I prefer to sail to Hawaii at 35,000 feet.![]()
What good it is to be here if I can’t rub in it a littleGo ahead Greg, rub it in.....![]()
Yeah, that's the kind of office job I'm looking for...View attachment 190761 View attachment 190763 View attachment 190764
At the “office”, watching another fantastic Maui sunset and the worlds best Mai Tai!
Cheers,
Greg
The more realistic descriptors would be a good value, well maintained, seaworthy craft capable of safely crossing open waters—words which would not be oxymoronic. “Affordability” means nothing to a third-party observer. Who knows what another person can “afford?” Consult a financial advisor for that. We could, however, make recommendations on what might or might not be a good value vessel.I think you have chosen 3 words that are oxymorons; Affordable, Low Maintenance, Blue Water.
First, I'd like to suggest that knowing how to sail is not nearly enough to make an informed decision about a liveaboard cruiser.
If that boat is to be your home, then it must be a comfortable one for you, not me or anyone else, and that takes you getting on a lot of boats. All boats are a compromise, and what you will compromise on comes only from experience, and that is most inexpensively done by sailing on other people's boats or chartering. Buying a boat you later find is not a comfortable home can be very expensive and unpleasant.
Greg,What good it is to be here if I can’t rub in it a little
Great feed back. THANKS!!The more realistic descriptors would be a good value, well maintained, seaworthy craft capable of safely crossing open waters—words which would not be oxymoronic. “Affordability” means nothing to a third-party observer. Who knows what another person can “afford?” Consult a financial advisor for that. We could, however, make recommendations on what might or might not be a good value vessel.
“Low maintenance” is also a meaningless search metric. Basically, all seacraft are high maintenance by landslide standards. Avoiding teak is not going to make a craft “low maintenance.” In fact, teak is on vessels b/c it is a wood that can withstand harsh sea conditions with little maintenance. The teak that receives the kind of “maintenance” you fear is on boats that rarely leave theIr slips.
Finally, the question regarding “blue water” should more generally be one of seaworthiness for crossing oceans. Often this is related to its displacement, definitely to its condition, and its “seakeeping” ability.
So, the question might be one of looking for recommendations for a mid- or heavy displacement vessel with good seakeeping characteristics, one requiring only minimal crew, two persons perhaps, that has been well- maintained. Try looking at the Pearson 365. But what to look for in a well maintained vessel? Good thread question. Maybe next.
This is an excellent reframing of the question. The question really could not be answered as originally posed.The more realistic descriptors would be a good value, well maintained, seaworthy craft capable of safely crossing open waters—words which would not be oxymoronic. “Affordability” means nothing to a third-party observer. Who knows what another person can “afford?” Consult a financial advisor for that. We could, however, make recommendations on what might or might not be a good value vessel.
“Low maintenance” is also a meaningless search metric. Basically, all seacraft are high maintenance by landslide standards. Avoiding teak is not going to make a craft “low maintenance.” In fact, teak is on vessels b/c it is a wood that can withstand harsh sea conditions with little maintenance. The teak that receives the kind of “maintenance” you fear is on boats that rarely leave theIr slips.
Finally, the question regarding “blue water” should more generally be one of seaworthiness for crossing oceans. Often this is related to its displacement, definitely to its condition, and its “seakeeping” ability.
So, the question might be one of looking for recommendations for a mid- or heavy displacement vessel with good seakeeping characteristics, one requiring only minimal crew, two persons perhaps, that has been well-maintained. Try looking at the Pearson 365. But what to look for in a well maintained vessel? Good thread question. Maybe next.
seaworthiness for crossing oceans
Now there’s a thought. How soon do you want to head offshore? Do you really want to head offshore? I know there is a lot to see and explore here on the west coast. I’ve been sailing here, as far south as Seattle and as far North as Ketchikan, for more than 60 years and haven’t seen it all yet.Perhaps you should consider this boat thing as an adventure with different stages, requiring different equipment along the way.
Isn't blue water called ice up dar in da nort country....ehYou are from Saskatchewan? That's about as far from any ocean as I could imagine living. Where are you going blue water sailing?
dj