My point being that people are never good at assessing their own skills.
Hmmmm..... Interesting.
My point being that people are never good at assessing their own skills.
I think that person has already has asked him/her self the What If? questions.Someone who would happily jump aboard their boat and go is most likely someone who's boat is prepared for the voyage (except for provisioning) and has the experience and confidence to understand all the potential difficulties a voyage like that might entail. That same person would know before accepting that hurricane season isn't the time he'd want to make the trip, and decline.
Perhaps my thinking is a bit skewed by the fact we are sitting in the Windwards in the hurricane season and our boat is prepared and provisioned for a trip of almost any length at a few hour's notice?
As someone who plays a lot of chess, I know what you mean in that no two games are the same, or end the same. But it is possible to make the same or similar mistakes repeatedly among your games. The saying goes, paraphrased, “the player who wins a game of chess is the one who makes the next to the last mistake.”sailing to me is like playing the game of chess. no two days have ever been the same. the learning curve is endless.
Actually, a person can assess his or her own skills if the assessment is relative to a standard, not to skills of other sailors they may know. It might have gotten lost in the depths of some of our debate, but the original question was how to determine, a priori, “advanced” or “competent”, standing to join a cruising fleet to some destination where certain skills might be called upon. I return to inspection of the boat itself as a first cut. Is it outfitted properly to begin with?Hmmmm..... Interesting.![]()
If you have a large enough line of credit on your card, with a book in one hand and the card in the other a boat can outfitted for all conditions without the owner knowing squat about sailing off shore.Actually, a person can assess his or her own skills if the assessment is relative to a standard, not to skills of other sailors they may know. It might have gotten lost in the depths of some of our debate, but the original question was how to determine, a priori, “advanced” or “competent”, standing to join a cruising fleet to some destination where certain skills might be called upon. I return to inspection of the boat itself as a first cut. Is it outfitted properly to begin with?
Yes, but I said as a “first cut.” So now the sailor confirms at least what probably should be on the boat; determining whether s/he knows how to use it is another question. But in my experience, sailors who wish to join a cruise lacking the “recommended” equipment are reluctant to buy it just for that one cruise, as they may see it. If I tell someone that another full set of ground tackle is needed, I may or may not see that person along. I know of people wishing to anchor on HEAVY chain in rough places, 34-ft boat, yet have no windlass.If you have a large enough line of credit on your card, with a book in one hand and the card in the other a boat can outfitted for all conditions without the owner knowing squat about sailing off shore.
Wouldn't anybody even considering a voyage like that already know all those things about his/her boat? Were I asking folks to join such an adventure I wouldn't think it my place to inspect their boats for my idea of seaworthiness. That is why you'll never see me in a rally.Can the thru-hulls be closed, do the running lights work, can the mainsail be readily reefed, is there a boom-brake or preventer assembly, are there jacklines installed, is there a life raft, are there at least two sets of properly-sized ground tackle, can a dinghy be stowed aboard, are there extra winch handles, is there a first-aid kit with actual medical stuff in it (not a basic WM off the shelf version), do the bilge pumps work, are there bailing buckets, are MMSI numbers installed on the VHF, are there 7x50 binoculars, etc. The list could go on. But, without asking many questions of actual experience, I think I would know at least the level of preparedness the sailor deems sufficient.
Well, I didn’t actually mean “inspection” literally as a third party. Unless you are a race official or coastie you wouldn’t be literally inspecting other folk’s boats, of course. More likely, I’d share an items list with folks interested, etc.Wouldn't anybody even considering a voyage like that already know all those things about his/her boat? Were I asking folks to join such an adventure I wouldn't think it my place to inspect their boats for my idea of seaworthiness. That is why you'll never see me in a rally.
Good point I’m afraid. You’re asking the same question (“is my boat good enough to do X?”), but you’re asking it about other people’s boats instead of your own. And because you’re asking about other people’s boats you also need to consider the skills of the sailor, whereas people asking it about their own boat assume the sailor has adequate skills. Since we’ve never been able to answer the bluewater boat question in a standard agreeable way I’m not optimistic that there’ll be any better standardized silver bullet answer for this question either. There will always be factors that increase the risks and factors that mitigate the risks. The discussion above does a great job of enumerating those factors, but none on their own seem to lend themselves to a standard formula of what’s acceptable.In any event, it appears this discussion is taking on the color of one about what is, or what isn’t, a blue-water boat! I’ve been wondering lately if there is, anymore, such a thing as “definition” even with a check-list.
Funny you should ask.I’ve been wondering lately if there is, anymore, such a thing as “definition” even with a check-list.
This is a great point. The challenge to answer the question, I feel, is in part dependent o the tolerances of the individuals addressing the question.Since we’ve never been able to answer the bluewater boat question in a standard agreeable way
I'll take your quiz.Rgranger, I tend to get more directly to the point, as in.
1) Can you or have you set a reef in Force 6 conditions or near there?
2) How do you pick an anchor spot in a new anchorage? What is your preferred scope?
3) What watch schedules have you worked, and for how long? (ex 4 on/off-three crew; 3 on/off-two crew, etc., for three 24-hr periods).
4) Give an example of a MAYDAY and one of a PAN-PAN. Have you ever issued one or the other? What was the outcome?
5) What is the minimum sea room you would accept heaving-to in your boat in a Force 8 gale for 6 hr?
6) How would you stop a run-away diesel?
Agreed! I think the fact that a sailor knows what should be on their boat is a good starting point in assessing their knowledge/skill. Knowledge and skill are not the same thing but one does precede the other.Yes, but I said as a “first cut.” So now the sailor confirms at least what probably should be on the boat; determining whether s/he knows how to use it is another question. But in my experience, sailors who wish to join a cruise lacking the “recommended” equipment are reluctant to buy it just for that one cruise, as they may see it. If I tell someone that another full set of ground tackle is needed, I may or may not see that person along. I know of people wishing to anchor on HEAVY chain in rough places, 34-ft boat, yet have no windlass.How could this boat get underway in short-time with the rest of the fleet if need be?
You would hope. But we have all read the stories of the novice who buys a boat, sells the farm and then quickly sinks their boat. (and then start a go-fund-me pageWouldn't anybody even considering a voyage like that already know all those things about his/her boat? Were I asking folks to join such an adventure I wouldn't think it my place to inspect their boats for my idea of seaworthiness. That is why you'll never see me in a rally.
JudyB, I’ll take a stab at it.How far to you have to be from land to call it offshore or Blue water? I prefer to stay within a couple of hours of shore. I call trips like that a “Near Shore Passage”