Roy S wrote: "If you installed your bellows any time after 10/13 you should take a close look. The replacement bellows that I bought last week from Defender was actually manufactured in 4/17, three years ago."
Very interesting Have you notified PYI of this issue that two with the exact same manufacture date had a similar problem? Secondly, considering that the manufacturer recommends frequent inspection of the bellows and in addition recommends a replacement schedule based on "time" one would assume that there is a storage/shelf life on these bellows to get a reasonable service life out of them. How they are stored would make a difference too I assume. In my, and most all, boats the bellows, once installed, would be out of direct sunlight or any light, for that matter, so UV degradation should not be a factor.
Frankly, I'm disturbed that Defender would sell a product with a known service life on the order of years (not decades) that is already 3 years old. I imagine the retailer bought in bulk to get a price break and have a bunch of old ones. They may not even check manufacture date before they pull from stock. It would be interesting to know if the manufacturer has established a "use by" date for this item and taken that into account for the recommended replacement cycle. This may be one of the products that needs to be bought directly from the manufacturer rather than a retailer who may not rotate their stock. Just saying, but the plot thickens.
Very interesting Have you notified PYI of this issue that two with the exact same manufacture date had a similar problem? Secondly, considering that the manufacturer recommends frequent inspection of the bellows and in addition recommends a replacement schedule based on "time" one would assume that there is a storage/shelf life on these bellows to get a reasonable service life out of them. How they are stored would make a difference too I assume. In my, and most all, boats the bellows, once installed, would be out of direct sunlight or any light, for that matter, so UV degradation should not be a factor.
Frankly, I'm disturbed that Defender would sell a product with a known service life on the order of years (not decades) that is already 3 years old. I imagine the retailer bought in bulk to get a price break and have a bunch of old ones. They may not even check manufacture date before they pull from stock. It would be interesting to know if the manufacturer has established a "use by" date for this item and taken that into account for the recommended replacement cycle. This may be one of the products that needs to be bought directly from the manufacturer rather than a retailer who may not rotate their stock. Just saying, but the plot thickens.