For an MPPT controller.. If you size the wire for the run from the panel to the controller for 3% voltage loss, the current from the panel will remain the same but the voltage that "arrives" at the controller is 3% down. P = V*I so you also just lost 3% of the power the panel generated and that the MPPT controller could have taken advantage of. There is a 1 to 1 correlation between power loss and voltage loss for MPPT for the run between the panel and the controller.
If you have a PWM controller, when the controller is doing full charging (like in bulk), it simply forces the panel voltage to be the same as the battery voltage. If you have a voltage loss in the wire between the controller and the panel, it does not matter at all, the actual panel voltage will just be 3% higher than what is at the controller but the current from the panel will be the same. Since power in this case is current * battery voltage, the drop in the run between the panel the controller just doesnt matter. Remember that is ONLY with a PWM controller.
For the run between the controller and the battery and for MPPT, if you size the wire for 3% voltage loss, you also get about a 3% power loss (a little more complicated because this also affects the MPPT conversion efficiency). This power loss will add to power loss in the wire between the panel to the controller so if you sized both of those runs for 3%, you now will have a 6% total power loss from what the panel generated.
The run between the controller and the battery has another issue and that is the controller is determining when to cut back charging for going into the float phase by attempting to measure the battery voltage. If you have a 3% voltage loss in the wire between the controller and the battery, the controller will "think" the battery is 3% higher voltage that it actually is and will cut back the charging algorithm too early.
So you have some trad-offs to consider. The 3% sizing between the controller and the panel is probably reasonable (if you cant tolerate a 3% power loss, you might be running with too small of margins in the first place). However, my .02 is that 3% between the controller and the battery is too much.. I think 1% would be better. This also is easier if the controller is near the battery. And.. the controller is also trying to "know" the battery temp with a temp sensor usually located on the controller itself (part of the controller assembly) so another good reason to try and mount the controller near the battery.
Walt, Thank you.... this all makes sense to me now.
so even though it could be connected either way, sizing the wire to the entire run is by far the most efficient....
Stu mentioned about when falling between, or at the "edge" of the chart when sizing the wire, to use the next bigger wire. this has
always been my practice, but for my preliminary estimates the 5ga wire is at the front edge of the chart, so it will be able to handle another 5-6 amps before thinking of jumping up a size....and I dont ever expect to come near the max output anyway because the panels will be slightly tipped away from one another on the bimini top....
the chart I was using did not run as low as a 1% loss, but only down to "less than 3%".... I know there are many charts available and will do some more research on it, but with the conflicting information ive read, and without knowing what the
best way to figure the wire size with the controller in there, there was some confusion as to what I really wanted to do...
and I fully agree that for a few dollars more using heavier wire, amortized over several years, a 1% loss of power in that same period is much better than a 3% loss....
the controller will be mounted closer to the batts, and I can get it as close as 3ft if necessary, but I have a temp sensor for the bank so that the controller can be as efficient as possible...
and, no, I dont need all the power that the panels can theoretically produce (yet), but due to my location and the gloomy foggy days of winter, and because the solid mounted panels wont track the sun across the sky, I firmly believe in the 50% rule when sizing the panels.... but with more power, Rochelle is hoping for a refrigeration system of some type... we will have to wait and see
