Then they oughta learn it...........most boaters don't have a clue that a whistle signal means anything more than a car horn. This has been discussed several times in this forum, so i don't want to hijack the thread. Thoughts?
Maybe they need stern anchors. ;-)
OK, so there is no such thing as "right of way" on the water except in one special circumstance on inland waters, but maybe there is now a "right to remain ignorant" of the ColRegs. Obviously, no one would run over a stand-up paddle boarder or a kayaker to enforce a "stand on" status. I suppose it'd make no different if SUP's had not been designated a "vessel" by the USCG, one would still have to avoid them. Why do it if they are, in fact, to be viewed and treated only as a floating obstacle, and not as a vessel subject to Col Regs? By the way, these things are most dense in harbors, channels, and anchorages. This past summer heading into Mariners Cove (Mission Bay) we had to "thread our way" through a bunch of 'em, all kids, milling around the entrance with absolutely no apparent awareness of our presence or concern for it, etc. What we're acknowledging here is that they have "right" to use the navigable waterways with the privileges of a vessel but with absolutely none of the responsibilities of a vessel operator--perhaps not even to carry the required equipment--b/c few appear to (e.g., whistle, lifevest). Very strange, IMHO.
But he is not restricted in his ability to slow down or stop. Yeah, steerage can be an issue, but most of the time all that is needed is a willingness to wait.yahbut it is an overtaking boat that is restricted in its ability to maneuver? Assuming it has some significant draft
I wonder what happens if you cannot slow down or stop. Say you're sailing down the channel on a broad reach (lots of people do this) and one or more SUP's are crossing, or are starting to cross, the channel in front of you "in a line of ducks." What then? Do "human powered" vessels have "rights" over a sailing vessel under sail in a channel with rocks on one side, beach on the other, and a whole bunch of other boats coming and going? If anything, a human powered vessel is more like a powerboat than a sailboat in that it can maneuver upwind w/o tacking, it can "stop" itself w/o having to turn into the wind, and can move against a weather current lacking sufficient wind that could move (over the ground) a sailboat in the same direction, etc. Besides, historically, human power was in the role that engine power is now. For example, serving as "auxiliary power" on galleys under oars, serving as "towboats" for sailing vessels becalmed, & serving as tenders to haul stuff (including crew) to and from the mother sailing vessel, etc. How could we come to the notion (have we?) that they should have privileges over sailing vessels under sail just due to ignorance of the operators (and/or their parents), I wonder--do they? That's still not clear beyond "avoid a collision if you can."But he is not restricted in his ability to slow down or stop. Yeah, steerage can be an issue, but most of the time all that is needed is a willingness to wait.
And failing "overtaking" there is always your duty to avoid collisions.I wonder what happens if you cannot slow down or stop. Say you're sailing down the channel on a broad reach (lots of people do this) and one or more SUP's are crossing, or are starting to cross, the channel in front of you "in a line of ducks." What then? Do "human powered" vessels have "rights" over a sailing vessel under sail in a channel with rocks on one side, beach on the other, and a whole bunch of other boats coming and going? If anything, a human powered vessel is more like a powerboat than a sailboat in that it can maneuver upwind w/o tacking, it can "stop" itself w/o having to turn into the wind, and can move against a weather current lacking sufficient wind that could move (over the ground) a sailboat in the same direction, etc. Beside, historically, human power was in the role that engine power is now. For example, serving as "auxiliary power" on galleys under oars, serving as "towboats" for sailing vessels becalmed, & serving as tenders to haul stuff (including crew) to and from the mother sailing vessel, etc. How could we come to the notion that somehow they'd have privileges over sailing vessels under sail just due to ignorance of the operator (and/or their parents), I wonder--or do they? That's not clear.
I should have said cannot stop suddenly and hold position, etc., to allow a crossing. Clearly, a sailboat operator can stop forward motion through the water at least momentarily by blowing sheets and turning into the wind. Also, it's a much simpler task to avoid a disabled vessel, etc., if you know what it is likely to do. With SUP's you don't know what they will do. As said earlier-assume they know nothing; therefore, any action is possible, even turning into the path of the oncoming vessel. A "deer in the headlights" type of thing. In the harbor I'm a sailboat if I'm sailing, period. I may, or may not, be able to switch on my engine to avoid something. Just this summer my starter failed and I suddenly found myself adrift in the harbor after shutting down the diesel (starter burning up), etc. Who's faster has nothing to do ColRegs as far as I can tell. I believe these people are being told that as a human-powered vessel they do not have to keep clear of other types of vessels or even bother with 'em at all. I actually heard somebody say that recently.If you are sailing down a channel on a broad reach and cannot stop or stay clear of a disabled or slow vessel, it is clear that you are sailing out of control. You had no reason to assume the way would remain clear, and in fact, it didn't. Seems you me it would have been prudent to be a power vessel or take other measures. You can always slow down, at least minimizing a collision.
In harbor circumstances we are all power boats. Again, we are faster and must stay clear. And we can stop.
We are starting from the premise that the paddler is an idiot, does not know which way to go, and may not paddle well. No one has suggested that they are stand-on or privileged in any special sense, only that we are generally faster and smarter and can stop when under power, though often we act as though we cannot. Pedestrians ONLY have the right of way in a cross walk, but we stop to avoid jaywalkers. That is our duty. And who among us has not been a stupid, mindless pedestrian at some point in a shopping center parking lot? Thus, we drive slowly in parking lots. And perhaps they see themselves as pedestrians, when they think at all.
Great question -- and a review of the ColRegs don't give an easy answer. Rule 25 talks about lighting such craft (like a sailboat), but the definitions seems to indicate they're neither fish nor fowl - they don't have machinery or sails. A Google search indicates that this is a rich topic of conversation on blogs such as this one, and makes for interesting reading if you don't expect it to resolve itself. Sort of like debating matters of taste over a beer.I wonder what happens if you cannot slow down or stop. Say you're sailing down the channel on a broad reach (lots of people do this) and one or more SUP's are crossing, or are starting to cross, the channel in front of you "in a line of ducks." What then? Do "human powered" vessels have "rights" over a sailing vessel under sail in a channel with rocks on one side, beach on the other, and a whole bunch of other boats coming and going? "
I think jibes has this right, at least in my home harbor. Google Gig Harbor and you will see the entrance to my home port. There is a very nice public beach on the spit and a few venders who rent paddle boards and kayaks to tourists on the harbor. On a busy summer weekend, the channel into the harbo is full of all kinds of boats entering and leaving. At low tide the channel with enough depth for my boat can dwindle down to a handful of meters in width. Plus, due to some spits, the channel is not obvious to the uninitiated.in many cases those paddle boarders are renting the board and don't have very good skills. I see people every day renting a board, learning how to stand up and paddle and immediately paddle out into the boat channel to get to the beach. It is possible the horn will startle them causing them to fall off the board in the channel. I recommend giving them a lot of space, and assume they know nothing.
This post sums up most of the sentiment expressed in this thread. One looking at paddle boarders as people in the water, rather than looking at paddle boards as "vessels" under command of an operator. Respectively, it's absurd in our common sense to view a 14 yr-old kid w/o certification or any other training as the master, or operator, of a VESSEL. But look at bicycle riders. Bicycles are regarded as vehicles the same as cars. A 14 yr old riding a bicycle is not usually a licensed operator and his/her vehicle carries no registration, etc. And the vehicle is human powered. Cyclists are still expected to follow traffic regulations even if they rarely do. Stop at stop signs, at traffic lights, signal their turns, use lights after dark, & yield to pedestrians, etc. They have no rights over automobiles or other vehicles except as defined by traffic laws. And nobody would run over a kid on bicycle just to enforce a "right of way" rule. However, I'm sure even a kid knows to stop at a traffic light at a busy intersection. The obligations of one vehicle to another are defined by the rules of the road--not by how the vehicle is powered or how fast it can go. Bicyclers can be fined if caught breaking the rules, just as a driver of an automobile. I don't think you'd see a group of kids on bicycles spinning doilies at the mouth of a freeway on-ramp, etc.I had missed a page of comments, and it seems there are a lot of hypothetical situations being brought forward but if you can think of a situation that puts you in between a rock and a hard place or hitting a paddle boarder you better steer for that rock.