Yanmar 2GM20F – Upgrade Raw Water Intake Seacock from ½” to ¾”?

Jun 14, 2025
104
Hunter 1981 30 Chesapeake
Hi all,

I’ve got a Yanmar 2GM20F (16-18 HP) with a ½” raw water intake seacock. I’m hauling out soon to redo my thru-hulls, and I’m considering enlarging the intake hole and installing a ¾” seacock instead.

My current setup has run fine—engine runs for hours without overheating—but I’ve heard from a few people that ½” might be a bit undersized for this engine.

Has anyone upgraded their intake size for a 2GM20F? Is it worth opening up the hole and going to ¾”? Or should I leave it as-is if it’s working fine?

Looking for any firsthand experiences or best-practice advice.

Thanks!
 
Nov 6, 2006
10,093
Hunter 34 Mandeville Louisiana
Not at boat now, but I think those raw water hoses are 5/8" on my 3GMF.. A 5/8" thru-hull gives ya a smidge more than 50% flow area, so if the 1/2" is not causing a problem a 5/8 should make the non problem better
 
  • Like
Likes: BigEasy
Jun 21, 2004
2,887
Beneteau 343 Slidell, LA
Fairly certain that I have 5/8” fitting & hose on my 3YM30 Yanmar. Had a scoop strainer thru hull fitting from factory; however, I removed it & installed a straight fitting. Too many barnacles made a home in the strainer portion of thru hull with no provision of cleaning.
 
  • Like
Likes: Hello Below
Jun 14, 2025
104
Hunter 1981 30 Chesapeake
Fairly certain that I have 5/8” fitting & hose on my 3YM30 Yanmar. Had a scoop strainer thru hull fitting from factory; however, I removed it & installed a straight fitting. Too many barnacles made a home in the strainer portion of thru hull with no provision of cleaning.
That's a great set up. I'm already on the hard and have power tools available. One thing I'm nervous about is screwing the basket stainer into the hull. It seems like an odd way to go about attachment. I also have the fresh water strainer, albeit a plastic housed one.
 
Nov 21, 2012
732
Yamaha 33 Port Ludlow, WA
3GM30F owner here. When I bought Tosca the diesel survyor said the 1/2" throughhull was undersized. When I redid my throughhulls a few years later I increased it to 3/4".
 
Jan 22, 2008
1,666
Hunter 34 Alameda CA
Here is a link to a write-up I did a few years ago upsizing my raw water through hull to 3/4". I also upsized the hoses from the valve to the strainer. It reduced the frequency of getting obstructions clogging the path to the strainer.

 

Ward H

.
Nov 7, 2011
3,786
Catalina 30 Mk II Cedar Creek, Bayville NJ
I upgraded from 1/2" to 3/4" thru hull for my engine water intake for a different reason. Hose barbs for 1/2" hose have smaller ID's than 1/2". I had a couple of small clogs of fine grass restrict the water flow. I went with a 3/4" thru hull and hoses to my 3/4" Groco Strainer intake. Then reduced to 5/8" to the pump.
That lets the grass and other crap reach the strainer where it is removed.
 
Jun 14, 2025
104
Hunter 1981 30 Chesapeake
I upgraded from 1/2" to 3/4" thru hull for my engine water intake for a different reason. Hose barbs for 1/2" hose have smaller ID's than 1/2". I had a couple of small clogs of fine grass restrict the water flow. I went with a 3/4" thru hull and hoses to my 3/4" Groco Strainer intake. Then reduced to 5/8" to the pump.
That lets the grass and other crap reach the strainer where it is removed.
What engine do you have? This is an interesting idea. Allowing a larger flow area into the strainer but keeping the water intake size into the engine.