Is it the general consensus that any wooden boat is a potential classic that is worth restoration and would be found to be beautiful if only restored? Collectively, none of us, not even the current owner, knows the pedigree behind this boat. Jon suggested that it looks like a "Tahiti". Not knowing what a "Tahiti" looks like, I tried to find an example on-line. I found some examples of a "Tahiti Ketch" a rather ugly looking canoe shape, with excessive freeboard, unappealing shear, and boxy cabin top that makes a canoe look awkward, if that's possible.
I don't mean to demean Todd's sense of beauty, but this does not look like an attractive boat to me. Is this a case where we all become enamored over a boat just because of our romance for wood? That's pretty much what I think. The discussion seems to have evolved into a general discussion about the complications of restoring and loving care that a classic wooden boat requires.
Jon pointed out some practical flaws with the lumber, and I'll suggest that he has a good eye for that. He also seems to imply that the boat is a home-build, which is pretty much what a Tahiti seems to be. https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/46398 This boat does not appear to be a ketch. It also has a ridiculous-looking bowsprit & a tree-trunk like tiller (if that is what it is
).
If the original builder didn't have much skill (that's what I see in the photos), why does this boat merit any attention? Perhaps it is because it has a very new-looking engine. I'll admit that is a positive. There may even be more valuables built into the boat already. Perhaps even some of the wooden structural components have some value.
But the question seemed to be should Todd consider restoring this wooden boat. My opinion is that we can't just jump to the conclusion that it is a classic wooden boat. We don't even know what it is! I wouldn't spend time and money on a home-made, ugly boat just because it is wood. I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it is a "classic" just because it is wood. I might be wrong, but won't somebody prove this boat's credentials before we jump to restoration? I haven't seen anything mentioned except for Jon's reference to a "Tahiti". Does that make it a classic? I'm not convinced yet. I see that it has an Illinois registration sticker. Perhaps it was built in some farmer's barn somewhere near the Ohio River!
Of course the Bed & Breakfast idea puts a different spin on the matter, but Todd seems to throw out the idea that the boat could also be used for cruising. So which is it, dock condo or cruising classic? What's it supposed to be and what could it be? My opinion is (and it's only a personal opinion) that it is an ugly boat and not worth the effort. I don't know who would find it beautiful, even if improved. It's probably the pilot house that turns me off. It looks like one of those cartoons, like the train cartoon (Thomas & Friends, I'm thinking about). It is charming for a cartoon, not for a real-life boat. Perhaps the shape of the boat would look much better if the pilot house was taken off & re-done.
I don't mean to demean Todd's sense of beauty, but this does not look like an attractive boat to me. Is this a case where we all become enamored over a boat just because of our romance for wood? That's pretty much what I think. The discussion seems to have evolved into a general discussion about the complications of restoring and loving care that a classic wooden boat requires.
Jon pointed out some practical flaws with the lumber, and I'll suggest that he has a good eye for that. He also seems to imply that the boat is a home-build, which is pretty much what a Tahiti seems to be. https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/46398 This boat does not appear to be a ketch. It also has a ridiculous-looking bowsprit & a tree-trunk like tiller (if that is what it is
If the original builder didn't have much skill (that's what I see in the photos), why does this boat merit any attention? Perhaps it is because it has a very new-looking engine. I'll admit that is a positive. There may even be more valuables built into the boat already. Perhaps even some of the wooden structural components have some value.
But the question seemed to be should Todd consider restoring this wooden boat. My opinion is that we can't just jump to the conclusion that it is a classic wooden boat. We don't even know what it is! I wouldn't spend time and money on a home-made, ugly boat just because it is wood. I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that it is a "classic" just because it is wood. I might be wrong, but won't somebody prove this boat's credentials before we jump to restoration? I haven't seen anything mentioned except for Jon's reference to a "Tahiti". Does that make it a classic? I'm not convinced yet. I see that it has an Illinois registration sticker. Perhaps it was built in some farmer's barn somewhere near the Ohio River!
Of course the Bed & Breakfast idea puts a different spin on the matter, but Todd seems to throw out the idea that the boat could also be used for cruising. So which is it, dock condo or cruising classic? What's it supposed to be and what could it be? My opinion is (and it's only a personal opinion) that it is an ugly boat and not worth the effort. I don't know who would find it beautiful, even if improved. It's probably the pilot house that turns me off. It looks like one of those cartoons, like the train cartoon (Thomas & Friends, I'm thinking about). It is charming for a cartoon, not for a real-life boat. Perhaps the shape of the boat would look much better if the pilot house was taken off & re-done.