Winter standing rigging maintenance

Sep 25, 2008
7,345
Alden 50 Sarasota, Florida
I recall using a similar chart to calculate actual net shrinkage (different than the Seinfeld connotation) years ago when we lived up north and it was around 2 inches on a 60 ft mast (the diagonal length). That is, the shroud was effectively 2 inches longer than when ambient temperature was above 70degrees F.

There was no way I was going to introduce more and risk constant movement.
 
Oct 29, 2016
1,929
Hunter 41 DS Port Huron
I recall using a similar chart to calculate actual net shrinkage (different than the Seinfeld connotation) years ago when we lived up north and it was around 2 inches on a 60 ft mast (the diagonal length). That is, the shroud was effectively 2 inches longer than when ambient temperature was above 70degrees F.

There was no way I was going to introduce more and risk constant movement.
I did not use a chart I looked up the coefficient of expansion for the materials listed coefficient * 10^-6 * Delta T to arrive at differential length, I added 5' to the longest shroud which is actually wat too much for the tangental length.
 
Oct 29, 2016
1,929
Hunter 41 DS Port Huron
I did not use a chart I looked up the coefficient of expansion for the materials listed coefficient * 10^-6 * Delta T to arrive at differential length, I added 5' to the longest shroud which is actually way too much for the tangental length.There is no way a 60' mast or SS shrouds would shrink 2" at 50* Delta T.
 
Last edited:
Sep 25, 2008
7,345
Alden 50 Sarasota, Florida
I didn't explain it clearly -it was the net change to which I referred, I.e., the shrouds were the equivalent on 2 inches shorter.