G
Gord May
Why ABYC, CFR’s, Etc?Let me apologize, in advance, for a personal rant. Many of the topics we discuss can have a significant effect on the welfare of our membership. It been said that the American Boat & Yacht Council (ABYC) “Standards & Recommended Practices” and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR’s) may be primarily intended for the guidance Professional Boatbuilders and Repairers.I believe that anyone, undertaking modifications or repairs to a boat, would want to perform that work in as professional a manner as possible. Your personal safety and the utility & value of your boat depend upon the skill and expertise you bring to the job . I am often dismayed by the amount & degree of (what I believe to be) serious misinformation I sometimes see posted on some boating forums. It’s not always easy, for the novice, to determine the accuracy and truth (= value) of a given opinion. A well-written, but inaccurate (or misleading or incomplete) posting may seem as convincing as a less literate but more accurate one.So how do I winnow the wheat from the chafe? The less I (personally) know about a subject, the more I rely upon expert citations & references. CFR’s & ABYC references have the advantage of force of law, and are based upon a consensus of expertise (panels of “experts” write & review them). Likewise, respected expert authors (Caulder?) can lend some weight to an opinion. I often represent myself as “expert” in a given matter (as do others) - but most of you don’t know me (us) at all, and may have some difficulty in appraising my (our) opinions.Many of the subject we discuss have whole textbooks (or at least chapters) devoted to them. It’s unreasonable to expect anyone to research & compose a lengthy & learned treatise for posting to a free bulletin board. It is, however, quite reasonable to expect authors to avoid incomplete and/or inaccurate statements!The quickest way (I know of) to establish the basis of an opinion, is to cite expert references (ABYC, CFR’s, etc). Even more authority will be confirmed (upon an author), by the detailed explanation of the theory & practice underlying his recommendations. Much may be left unstated, but those simple inclusions (references) provide some measure of the author’s competence (and the veracity of his opinion) on a given subject. There’s a limit to the time & effort I’m willing to devote to authoring FREE consultations (this is my profession); but I always hope to provide enough information for a reader to understand (some of) the important principles underlying the subject; and to judge the value of my stated opinion.Am I long-winded and pedantic? You bet! I'll apologize (mostly for when I was too SHORT-winded), but I'm not ashamed.
IMHO & FWIW,Gord"If you didn't have the time/money/skill to do it right in the first place - where will you get the time/money/skill to fix it?"