@pumpkinpie You mention Radar at the end of your query.
I suggest you reverse this and look at it as the driving force in your decision.
There are a number of innovations and certainly it is clever to have the radar available on your plotter, but if you are going to be cruising a lot in weather reduced visibility you may want to have the radar a separate unit and the signal repeated on the MFD plotter. This way if the plotter goes gunny bag (and occasionally they do), you still have available radar information available. This supports having a common manufacture for the hardware.
In reviewing the radar systems look at the way you interface with the system. How the data is presented. How you change the gain or color. What data is presented. How many menu choices you have to go through to get the information you seek. At a recent class the instructor suggested a preference for the Simrad data displayed over the RayMarine. He had used RayMarine for years in the foul weather we enjoy in the PacificNW. We looked at the way the data shows movement of the returns (how the reflected images of targets are displayed by the radar). How the systems interpret movement and help filter the information.
Radar is nothing without an easy way to interpret the information you are receiving. For many sailors, they are just fuzzy green dots on a "real old" tv like screen. Take the time to look at real operating systems not just the "demo" images provided in a store.
Once you decide and install a system, you need to use it a lot so that you can understand the information displayed. You need to use it is clear bright sunshine when you can see the image on the screen then see it on the water around you. Only then can you build some reliability about your interpretations of the fuzzy green dots.