Weight of engine on a 240

[namaste]

The previous owner of the 240 that I just bought, indicated that the boat was stern heavy and could not handle the weight of a Mercury four stroke 9.9 HP. I have one, but am hesitant to take the 6 HP Johnson off if it's a problem. Is this so? Is There a problem with engine, fuel, passengers, etc. all toward the rear of the boat? Is there something that can/should be done to balance it?

 

[Eric]

Weight

I have a 1988 240 with a 1997 4 stroke Yamaha. Since that is the motor that she came with, I never gave it much thought. I can tell you that main concern I have noted on the forums here is that the motor does better with an extra long shaft (25") to reduce cavitation. I have the 25" shaft, and rarely experience cavitation. Another concern I have seen is that the 4 strokes have more tourque than the same HP 2 cycle motor. The extra tourque may be too much for the motor bracket. To windward I can balance the helm and lock the tiller and maintain a good course for several minutes with or without peeps on board. That tells me that she is well balanced. Downwind, it never hurts to have extra weight aft. I have never noted that she heels more on Port tack (motor offset to starboard). I will be checking that out tho, with the next sail.I think you will be just fine either way. 4 stroke motors are better for the environment as you know.Good winds,Eric

 

[Eric]

weight

what did you decide?

 

[Joe]

Motor weight

Well, I looked up the weight of my Merc 9.9, and it's a little on the heavy side, but it's new and paid for...so, I guess I'll put it on and see how she sits in the water. I have seen a couple of pics if 240's on the web that look a little stern heavy, but I don't think I'm ready to load up the forepeak with lead. I though of maybe moving the water tank up there.Another note--do you have a bimini on your boat? Do you know where I might get one. I had one on my last boat and really liked it.Thanks for your response.'joe