Although this topic may have been thrashed enough on this forum (please point me to the threads), a comment in the thread on the Annapolis boatshow made me bring this up. The comment was that the twin helm was not appealing, or words to that effect.
Our boat is 34' and has twin helms. We find this arrangement beneficial in several ways: The helmsman can choose the side with the best view for the situation at hand. With the aft part of the cockpit open almost to either side of the hull, access to the aft cleats is easy as is reaching out with a boat hook to grab lines. When I am sailing with my wife, changing over control is simple with the no dancing to get around the wheel. The cockpit is much more open and moving about is easier (important especially to my wife who has some mobility issues). And, in the evening in the slip, we can place two lawn chairs at the stern to relax.
OTOH, the mechanics are more involved and increase the cost. I have not heard of any failures of the wheels-to-rudders (twin rudders) system.
We are pleased with the layout. Is the move of many boat builders to twin helms here to stay, or a fashion?
Our boat is 34' and has twin helms. We find this arrangement beneficial in several ways: The helmsman can choose the side with the best view for the situation at hand. With the aft part of the cockpit open almost to either side of the hull, access to the aft cleats is easy as is reaching out with a boat hook to grab lines. When I am sailing with my wife, changing over control is simple with the no dancing to get around the wheel. The cockpit is much more open and moving about is easier (important especially to my wife who has some mobility issues). And, in the evening in the slip, we can place two lawn chairs at the stern to relax.
OTOH, the mechanics are more involved and increase the cost. I have not heard of any failures of the wheels-to-rudders (twin rudders) system.
We are pleased with the layout. Is the move of many boat builders to twin helms here to stay, or a fashion?