A big reason why this discussion has gone on so long is that we have different folks talking about different things and folks use terminology differently. A boat’s performance is speed through the water, of course. That is what the polars measure, etc. I read the article. What the author is trying to explain is that current has to be considered when measuring boat performance to the polars. The water flowing over the keel is affected by the current so the windspeed and direction relative to the current’s speed and direction are what matters in this case. This is a separate subject.I respectfully disagree. From the standpoint of measuring the boat’s performance the speed through the water, and using the speed of the wind relative to the water, are what matter. This is what your polars measure.
You don’t have to take my word for it. Here’s a write up from an instrument manufacturer on the differences and some reasons why measuring water-relative wind speed is preferred:True wind - Ockam Sailing Instruments. The links on that page also go to some good discussions of the relationship between current and wind. Ockam says they default to using water relative wind speed. Navico (B&G, Simrad, Lowrance) does the same as well, allowing the user to switch to ground relative wind, but burying that way down in the settings, not making it the default.
6 weeks ago I would have agreed with you Will. That is certainly in their mind. But now I think that depends on the local club racer or the elite racer.Racers care the most about their speed relative to their competition,
Mark you had my "Like" right up to this point.The water flowing over the keel is affected by the current so the windspeed and direction relative to the current’s speed and direction are what matters in this case.
I don't have a clear understanding of this term. Never heard it until joining SBO, in fact. Since then, I've heard different definitions. The one I'm sticking with, so far, is velocity DDW/DUW. It isn't to a point downwind or upwind, but rather to your progress in the direction of or against the wind.Then Scott slipped in the concept fo VMG (velocity made good) and racers. This adds a new dimension to the equation. Now not only do we need to consider the speed of the boat on the water we want to maximize the movement of the boat relative to two fixed places on the globe.
VMG is really about measuring how effectively you’re moving toward a point. We talk about measuring VMG in two ways - pure geometric distance to the mark, or speed straight into or away from the wind. Now, when you’re inside the lay lines, measuring speed directly to the mark turns out to be an inaccurate way to figure out how well you’re actually progressing to that mark. Imagine this - you’re 5 boat lengths from the starboard layline, on port tack, but 50 boat lengths from the port layline. Your VMG directly to the mark looks really bad, because your pointed about 85 degrees off it. So you tack, and your VMG goes up to almost your full boat speed, because you’re only 5 degree off your target. Thing is, whether you tacked or stayed on port tack until you got to the layline, you’re really still making the same progress to your destination. So instead we use VMG directly upwind to measure our sailing performance and calculate the time it will take to get to a destination. Once you’re outside the layline the model changes - sailing away from the mark becomes lost distance, so your VMG should be calculated based on the mark only.I don't have a clear understanding of this term. Never heard it until joining SBO, in fact. Since then, I've heard different definitions. The one I'm sticking with, so far, is velocity DDW/DUW. It isn't to a point downwind or upwind, but rather to your progress in the direction of or against the wind.
I know it is used most often in reference to the downwind or upwind mark on a race course, but I didn't think that is part of the definition.
-Will (Dragonfly)
Very well said.VMG is really about measuring how effectively you’re moving toward a point. We talk about measuring VMG in two ways - pure geometric distance to the mark, or speed straight into or away from the wind. Now, when you’re inside the lay lines, measuring speed directly to the mark turns out to be an inaccurate way to figure out how well you’re actually progressing to that mark. Imagine this - you’re 5 boat lengths from the starboard layline, on port tack, but 50 boat lengths from the port layline. Your VMG directly to the mark looks really bad, because your pointed about 85 degrees off it. So you tack, and your VMG goes up to almost your full boat speed, because you’re only 5 degree off your target. Thing is, whether you tacked or stayed on port tack until you got to the layline, you’re really still making the same progress to your destination. So instead we use VMG directly upwind to measure our sailing performance and calculate the time it will take to get to a destination. Once you’re outside the layline the model changes - sailing away from the mark becomes lost distance, so your VMG should be calculated based on the mark only.
If you watch televised sailing races they often have a line drawn across the bow of the lead boat perpendicular to the wind. VMG is basically how fast that line is progressing up the course, and isn’t affected by whether the boat is sailing on port or starboard tack, inside the lines.
Chartplotters often can do this math for you as well. When navigating to a point, our B&G plotter can show both “VMG” (geometric to that point) and “sailing VMG” which accounts for the boat’s polars to figure out whether the boat is inside the laylines, and if it is will show upwind/downwind VMG.