Joe,
I got a couple of philosophical questions for you, because you seem so adamant about using True Wind to define a Point of Sail.
1) do you consider a POS a precise condition ?
I have always used terms such as "close hauled", "close reach", "beam reach", "broad reach", "downwind" as loose terms describing a range of apparent wind.
"Close hauled" and "dead downwind" are the only ones that have exact definitions.
The reason I use POS defined by apparent wind is that I use POS as a guide to discussing sail trim. Only any boat, the sail trim for a "beam reach" will be similar. But if we define "beam reach" as relative to the true wind, then on the slow boat I might have an 80 deg AWA ( apparent wind angle ) and on the fast boat have a 40 deg AWA. This would require very different sail trim.
2) Do you consider POS more as a navigation aid or a sail trim aid ?
Thanks
Todd
I got a couple of philosophical questions for you, because you seem so adamant about using True Wind to define a Point of Sail.
1) do you consider a POS a precise condition ?
I have always used terms such as "close hauled", "close reach", "beam reach", "broad reach", "downwind" as loose terms describing a range of apparent wind.
"Close hauled" and "dead downwind" are the only ones that have exact definitions.
The reason I use POS defined by apparent wind is that I use POS as a guide to discussing sail trim. Only any boat, the sail trim for a "beam reach" will be similar. But if we define "beam reach" as relative to the true wind, then on the slow boat I might have an 80 deg AWA ( apparent wind angle ) and on the fast boat have a 40 deg AWA. This would require very different sail trim.
2) Do you consider POS more as a navigation aid or a sail trim aid ?
Thanks
Todd