Thats strange echo; as I have outsailed catalina's
more than once. They have outsailed me as well(a 27), but my mac (traditional 26s) has beaten them more than once...for a whooooole lot less money. The durability is not as good, the cabin not as nice, but it's durability has done very well for me, and, as much as I trailor it has saved me alot of dough.I was out at a large lake in Alabama a couple of months ago...very good wind; whitecapping, probably about 15-20 mph. Thre were hunters and catalinas in the marina with folks who came to sail, but did not want to go out in the wind. I reefed my main, kept my jib up, and had a great day sailing in wind that [these two; a 22 and 27] catalina owners, and a hunter 26 were intimidated to go out in. Of course that may have more to do with the sailors than the boat...but my point is that these boats were close enough where I went out and did fine, while they did not.The traditional macs sail extremely well (as previously stated I have outsailed a C27), cost less, and trailor lightly. They get a bad rap because they are built more lightly and have a spartan interior. You can fix up the interior some, and people have sailed many miles in the 25 or 26s...without reports of them breaking up or failing... Mine has been coastal off charleston, tampa, pensacola, panama city, several different key islands, and literally dozens of lakes. A good boat (and skipper for that matter) is one that gets sailed alot, yields pleasurable anchorages and brings you back home. I see many very nice boats that get sailed very little due to money, hard to trailor and set up, or being bored with sailing grounds.I am not saying do not get a catalina, they are great boats and have a faithful following. But I am saying that, in my opinion, the traditional macs do indeed compare to a catalina; esp. if you have a limited budget, or other places you want to put your money. And, most owners would buy the boat again.