Correction Factors
As you probably know, there were several other sailboaters on that "race" including myself. Nothing like going for a ride with someone elses fuel. The boat I was on was burning 38 gallons/hour! Had a discussion with the skipper about it and he said when you consider the cost of the boat, about $1/2M, the annual maintenance costs, moorage, insurance, etc., fuel is a fairly small item and for the little amount of time he has available he likes to get out there and go. We were averaging over 15kts in "economy mode".The skipper stayed on a very tight course and didn't veer intentionally at all. He had two helpers that did sightings, navigation adjustments, etc. He called the "mark"s using a mirror to get it bisected or at right angles.The downside to this is we passed several other boats close abeam and this 50-footer threw a pretty mean wake. By close, I mean just a few boat lengths. One was a couple in an older sailboat, say, 30/32 feet or so, towing a dingy. They got rolled pretty good. Another sailboat coming out of Hidden Harbor on a course perpendicular to ours luffed to avoid getting any closer when we went by. Then there was a couple boats in Agate Pass that took our wake even though there was supposed to be basically no wake but our boat even going slow still had a pretty good wake.Bottom line, I think there should be a correction/adjustment factor thrown in for these, say, infractions.The skipper couldn't stay for dinner because of a meeting he had to attend so he ran back to Seattle at cruise speed. $$$A second correction/adjustment factor could be for the carbon footprint. The more fuel you burn the more time you get adjusted for.As it is, the faster boats apparently have a mathmatical edge over the slower boats.It was an interesting experience.