Bill, My only interest in this debate has derived
from the tone of the responses. Your first post condemned the entire report and all of the claims for the performance of the system as being much less than valid. Further you felt that there was intent to mislead with the statements made by the proponents of the system. As a result of an extremely negative characterization of the system and the people involved, you received a very hostile and defensive response. There has followed some clarification of the fine points of the performance of the system and what seems to remain is a question of whether or not there exists in Kuwait 16 hours of sufficient light to be considered daylight. That is could you work outside without artificial light? Versus the duration of sunlight. As the details of the operating system have become better explained and understood most of these disputes have been settled. Now we seem to have gotten to the point of who started calling "names" first. I think we could probably determine that as well but will it serve a useful purpose?So Are you convinced that the system will perform as claimed with a few caveat's? Are you satisfied that you drew as much blood as you lost?