Sorry Roger that is one of the most slanted and out of balance articles I have read in a long while. Not a surprise when you understand the source... :cussing: Another "the rich are evil" pieces....
So a local guy was going to lose his boat, probably due to bad buisness decisions, and Linda stepped in, bought it allowed him to fish it and continue to earn a living. The only stipulation she had was that he sell his lobsters to her business in return for keeping him in business.
Seems pretty fair seeing as he was going out of business anyway and it cost him nothing but a contract with a specific wholesaler. He STOLE from her by selling to the Co-Op, broke their deal, and she is evil for taking the boat back which she then owned???
Her store in PC is horribly inefficient and heating costs outweigh profits so she moves the winter counter to Tenants Harbor and is evil because some folks lost their winter jobs. So because she is "RICH" she should simply fund a business at a seasonal LOSS and keep those people employed under what? Linda's own personal welfare program?? Oh she's rich and can afford it...?? Businesses close non-profitable ventures every day. Tim Horton's is a "profitable company" should they continue to fund the 35+ stores hemorrhaging money and losing millions each year just because they are still a "wealthy" or "profitable" company???
The PC general store went out of business for a reason PROFIT and maintenance & heating costs were a big part of it. Linda is trying to run it as a profitable business but in Maine apparently that is an evil thing to do now..
Junk journalism IMHO
BS like this is a JOKE:
"An examination of town records shows that Bean appears to have grossly overpaid for at least two properties. One was valued at $280,000; Bean bought it for $795,000."
Having sat on our towns reevaluation committee I understand coastal Maine valuations and the process to a rather deep level. These types of sales are NOT uncommon when you have a real estate boom, which is when Linda bought much of that property. There were MANY coastal towns who's town taxable values were WAY out of line with fair market value. By state law the entire town needs to be at a certain % of FMV but many towns fall below quickly when a boom hits. We had to re-value multiple times in this decade just to keep up with state law. Of course St. George is rural/coastal so even with waterfront properties being out of line by as much as 20% of FMV the entire town may still be at or close to the 80% rule.
Do a fair market evaluation based on the TIME when she bought the property and I doubt you'd find her sale out of range by any more than +/- 5% at best. Though it is easier for a hack reporter to simply quote a tax books value vs. a sale value with no qualifiers. When the PC General Store was for sale and my wife and I looked at it. The asking price was WAY more than the town had it valued at. It needed perhaps 400-600k of work and we strongly decided against it..
My neighbors house was valued by Cumberland at $233k and it sold for $789....... But yeah Linda, all by herself, drove the real estate values on St. George through the roof.. Bunk!