teen leg stuck in prop

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 15, 2009
6,244
S2 9.2a Fairhope Al
Local papers indicate that the engine was running, this published story alludes to that,
http://hamptonroads.com/2011/07/girl-resting-after-surgery-leg-caught-propellers

Local papers again indicate it was a twin engine and that she was caught between the two props, but that is media reports.

Friday reports indicate her leg was "impaled" on the prop and the removed prop was transported in place with her to the hospital.

http://hamptonroads.com/2011/07/girl-rescued-propeller-va-beach-had-been-tubing

Prop was removed by divers and those Local divers, rescue, and EMS are to be commended. Appears she was quite lucky, all in all.

thanks for the artical....KD3......i am glad she is going to be ok .....the artical sounds like she is a real trooper and will over come this event ...hats off to the public servents and there efforts......

regards

woody
 
Oct 26, 2008
6,370
Catalina 320 Barnegat, NJ
Engine off or on?

I've seen a few assumptions that the engine was running. I saw nothing in the two articles that kd3pc posted that indicated that the engine was running and it certainly was not in gear. The articles say that the girl was attempting to climb out ... no doubt using the propeller as a step. I would bet that she slipped off the prop and her leg slid between the dual props (take a look at the dual prop configuation ... it's not hard to imagine how a small girl with a skinny leg could get impaled). If she had been attempting the climb out with the props in gear, her leg or foot would have been amputated by the props for sure.

My observations of Grady Whites (I've seen several on our lake) is that they are made for sport fishing and they are not designed for water sports. It sounds like it didn't have a swim platform, and come to think of it I don't think I've seen them with full-sized platforms. This sounds more like a case where the boat was being used for a purpose for which it is not designed. But there is nothing really uncommon about that.

Having grown thru my teens and early 20's with a ski boat with an outboard motor, I can tell you that I never got over that uneasy feeling that you get whenever somebody is behind the engine (or when you are in the water and the stern is pointed at you). In those days, only inboards had swim platforms and getting into the boat was a struggle for some people who couldn't lift themselves over the gunnel. Some people did resort to climbing in at the stern, using the prop as a step.

Since I've owned an inboard ski boat, I can tell you that you really have to work at it to get your feet near the prop because it is underneath the boat and the swim platform provides a fair amount of space. Of course reverse could get somebody in trouble, but for the most part, it is very easy to get real comfortable operating the boat with people in the water near the stern, especially in forward gear because the chance of getting any part of a human body (with a ski vest on) under the boat near the prop is pretty remote (unless you run a person over, of course). I am not saying this to justify operating a boat in an unsafe manner, I am just spelling it out the way it is. When pulling skiers on a routine basis, the engine is rarely shut off just because somebody is in the water near the stern. However, the gears are normally used with a lot of care.

Outboards and sterndrives are a different matter, though because the prop is behind the stern. I mention this because it appears that most people want to lump all matters of design and function together, when there really are distinct differences. Personally, I would never use a Grady White for water sports ... they aren't made for these activities. I see that a few models actually have a swim platform of sorts (but the prop is still exposed to anybody behind the boat) and they will advertise the boats for 'family fun' which includes tubing and other activities like that ... but they are designed for fishing and really have very little functionality for water sports.

Putting this accident in perspective ... there are so few prop-related accidents that it would be a shame if unknowledgable people had a hand in crafting and enforcing broad-brush regulation that unfailry penalizes boat designs that do not contribute to the problem.
 
Apr 22, 2009
342
Pearson P-31 Quantico
reminds me of a felame ... like it was mcdonalds fault coffee was hot and their fault she put it into her lap.../quote]

Facts and history is something that one really should read on the Mickey-D coffee case.

Everyone in the industry was informed several years before about the danger and everyoneELSE decided to change out their coffee makers to serve a slighly less scalding cup of coffee. MCD DID NOT.

The lady originally DID NOT SUE MCD. She asked MCD to pay for rather extensive hospital bills because the coffee was soooo freaking hot, it caused third degree burns on her nether regions. But of her pain and suffering, she never asked for anything.

MCDs said, "Sorry lady. We serve HOT COFFEE. TOO FREAKING BAD. If you don't like it . . .."

So then the lady got an attorney. The attorney did the digging. It seems that the attorney not only had documentation of the INDUSTRY PAID ANALYST recommending everyone turn down their coffee makers, but also that MCD coffee was sooo hot, people had scalded their mouths on the hot cofee -- scauldings that MCD at the highest levels were aware and , as a corporate decision, took no action to prevent future events.

Regarding props and cages, the Marine Corps, having lost a few Good Men or at least parts of a few good men in accidents involving recon type boating accidents, developed their own prop-encapsulating guard. If you did up recovery pictures of the train derailmant caused by a barge hitting a bridge in the fog down south, the guard is viewable on some of the inflatable boats. THe boats with guards were loaned for the recovery because of the danger PROPS would pose to the many divers in the recovery operation.
 
Oct 26, 2008
6,370
Catalina 320 Barnegat, NJ
This article says that the line pulled the girl ...

http://virginiabeach.wtkr.com/news/news/heroes-who-rescued-girl-impaled-boat-propeller/51164

It says she was on the tube and the line tangled with the prop, pulling the tube and the girl toward the stern. It also appears that this model of boat has a swim deck. This article and others say that the girl had attempted to climb out.

It sounds very confusing but looking at the swim deck, it seems that her attempt to climb out was a desperate move to avoid getting pulled under the boat.

Polypropylene line floats but it doesn't take much for some slack line to get under the swim deck when the boat is bouncing in waves. I imagine that the boat operator was attempting to idle away to take the slack out, which is common practice, when the line got tangled in the prop.

Getting a line wrapped in the prop is not an uncommon thing, but people who are experienced generally avoid it (I've never wrapped my prop in my own line). I've never heard of it actually pulling a person towards the boat ... but polypropylene stretches a lot and a good bit of it can wrap a prop before the engine stalls or the operator notices and shifts out of gear.

It actually sounds like a miracle that she didn't drown. There must have been some quick thinking to figure out what to do to save her life ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.